Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness and public health benefit of secondary cardiovascular disease prevention from improved adherence using a polypill in the UK

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the public health and economic benefits of adherence to a fixed-dose combination polypill for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular (CV) events in adults with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) in the UK. DESIGN: Markov-model-based cost-effectiveness analysis, inform...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Becerra, Virginia, Gracia, Alfredo, Desai, Kamal, Abogunrin, Seye, Brand, Sarah, Chapman, Ruth, García Alonso, Fernando, Fuster, Valentín, Sanz, Ginés
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4452741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25991449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007111
_version_ 1782374352745922560
author Becerra, Virginia
Gracia, Alfredo
Desai, Kamal
Abogunrin, Seye
Brand, Sarah
Chapman, Ruth
García Alonso, Fernando
Fuster, Valentín
Sanz, Ginés
author_facet Becerra, Virginia
Gracia, Alfredo
Desai, Kamal
Abogunrin, Seye
Brand, Sarah
Chapman, Ruth
García Alonso, Fernando
Fuster, Valentín
Sanz, Ginés
author_sort Becerra, Virginia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the public health and economic benefits of adherence to a fixed-dose combination polypill for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular (CV) events in adults with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) in the UK. DESIGN: Markov-model-based cost-effectiveness analysis, informed by systematic reviews, which identified efficacy, utilities and adherence data inputs. SETTING: General practice in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with a mean age of 64.7 years, most of whom are men with a recent or non-recent diagnosis of MI and for whom secondary preventive medication is indicated and well tolerated. INTERVENTION: Fixed-dose combination polypill (100 mg aspirin, 20 mg atorvastatin and 2.5, 5, or 10 mg ramipril) compared with multiple monotherapy. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: CV events prevented per 1000 patients; cost per life-year gained; and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. RESULTS: The model estimates that for each 10% increase in adherence, an additional 6.7% fatal and non-fatal CV events can be prevented. In the base case, over 10 years, the polypill would improve adherence by ∼20% and thereby prevent 47 of 323 (15%) fatal and non-fatal CV events per 1000 patients compared with multiple monotherapy, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £8200 per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses for the base-case assumptions showed an 81.5% chance of the polypill being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per QALY gained compared with multiple monotherapy. In scenario analyses that varied structural assumptions, ICERs ranged between cost saving and £21 430 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming that some 450 000 adults are at risk of MI, a 10 percentage point uptake of the polypill could prevent 3260 CV events and 590 CV deaths over a decade.The polypill appears to be a cost-effective strategy to prevent fatal and non-fatal CV events in the UK.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4452741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44527412015-06-08 Cost-effectiveness and public health benefit of secondary cardiovascular disease prevention from improved adherence using a polypill in the UK Becerra, Virginia Gracia, Alfredo Desai, Kamal Abogunrin, Seye Brand, Sarah Chapman, Ruth García Alonso, Fernando Fuster, Valentín Sanz, Ginés BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the public health and economic benefits of adherence to a fixed-dose combination polypill for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular (CV) events in adults with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) in the UK. DESIGN: Markov-model-based cost-effectiveness analysis, informed by systematic reviews, which identified efficacy, utilities and adherence data inputs. SETTING: General practice in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with a mean age of 64.7 years, most of whom are men with a recent or non-recent diagnosis of MI and for whom secondary preventive medication is indicated and well tolerated. INTERVENTION: Fixed-dose combination polypill (100 mg aspirin, 20 mg atorvastatin and 2.5, 5, or 10 mg ramipril) compared with multiple monotherapy. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: CV events prevented per 1000 patients; cost per life-year gained; and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. RESULTS: The model estimates that for each 10% increase in adherence, an additional 6.7% fatal and non-fatal CV events can be prevented. In the base case, over 10 years, the polypill would improve adherence by ∼20% and thereby prevent 47 of 323 (15%) fatal and non-fatal CV events per 1000 patients compared with multiple monotherapy, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £8200 per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses for the base-case assumptions showed an 81.5% chance of the polypill being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20 000 per QALY gained compared with multiple monotherapy. In scenario analyses that varied structural assumptions, ICERs ranged between cost saving and £21 430 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming that some 450 000 adults are at risk of MI, a 10 percentage point uptake of the polypill could prevent 3260 CV events and 590 CV deaths over a decade.The polypill appears to be a cost-effective strategy to prevent fatal and non-fatal CV events in the UK. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4452741/ /pubmed/25991449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007111 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Economics
Becerra, Virginia
Gracia, Alfredo
Desai, Kamal
Abogunrin, Seye
Brand, Sarah
Chapman, Ruth
García Alonso, Fernando
Fuster, Valentín
Sanz, Ginés
Cost-effectiveness and public health benefit of secondary cardiovascular disease prevention from improved adherence using a polypill in the UK
title Cost-effectiveness and public health benefit of secondary cardiovascular disease prevention from improved adherence using a polypill in the UK
title_full Cost-effectiveness and public health benefit of secondary cardiovascular disease prevention from improved adherence using a polypill in the UK
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness and public health benefit of secondary cardiovascular disease prevention from improved adherence using a polypill in the UK
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness and public health benefit of secondary cardiovascular disease prevention from improved adherence using a polypill in the UK
title_short Cost-effectiveness and public health benefit of secondary cardiovascular disease prevention from improved adherence using a polypill in the UK
title_sort cost-effectiveness and public health benefit of secondary cardiovascular disease prevention from improved adherence using a polypill in the uk
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4452741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25991449
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007111
work_keys_str_mv AT becerravirginia costeffectivenessandpublichealthbenefitofsecondarycardiovasculardiseasepreventionfromimprovedadherenceusingapolypillintheuk
AT graciaalfredo costeffectivenessandpublichealthbenefitofsecondarycardiovasculardiseasepreventionfromimprovedadherenceusingapolypillintheuk
AT desaikamal costeffectivenessandpublichealthbenefitofsecondarycardiovasculardiseasepreventionfromimprovedadherenceusingapolypillintheuk
AT abogunrinseye costeffectivenessandpublichealthbenefitofsecondarycardiovasculardiseasepreventionfromimprovedadherenceusingapolypillintheuk
AT brandsarah costeffectivenessandpublichealthbenefitofsecondarycardiovasculardiseasepreventionfromimprovedadherenceusingapolypillintheuk
AT chapmanruth costeffectivenessandpublichealthbenefitofsecondarycardiovasculardiseasepreventionfromimprovedadherenceusingapolypillintheuk
AT garciaalonsofernando costeffectivenessandpublichealthbenefitofsecondarycardiovasculardiseasepreventionfromimprovedadherenceusingapolypillintheuk
AT fustervalentin costeffectivenessandpublichealthbenefitofsecondarycardiovasculardiseasepreventionfromimprovedadherenceusingapolypillintheuk
AT sanzgines costeffectivenessandpublichealthbenefitofsecondarycardiovasculardiseasepreventionfromimprovedadherenceusingapolypillintheuk