Cargando…
Explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: a primary care vignette survey
OBJECTIVES: The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) is a collaboration between 6 countries and 12 jurisdictions with similar primary care-led health services. This study investigates primary care physician (PCP) behaviour and systems that may contribute to the timeliness of investig...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4452748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26017370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007212 |
_version_ | 1782374354359681024 |
---|---|
author | Rose, Peter W Rubin, Greg Perera-Salazar, Rafael Almberg, Sigrun Saur Barisic, Andriana Dawes, Martin Grunfeld, Eva Hart, Nigel Neal, Richard D Pirotta, Marie Sisler, Jeffrey Konrad, Gerald Toftegaard, Berit Skjødeberg Thulesius, Hans Vedsted, Peter Young, Jane Hamilton, Willie |
author_facet | Rose, Peter W Rubin, Greg Perera-Salazar, Rafael Almberg, Sigrun Saur Barisic, Andriana Dawes, Martin Grunfeld, Eva Hart, Nigel Neal, Richard D Pirotta, Marie Sisler, Jeffrey Konrad, Gerald Toftegaard, Berit Skjødeberg Thulesius, Hans Vedsted, Peter Young, Jane Hamilton, Willie |
author_sort | Rose, Peter W |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) is a collaboration between 6 countries and 12 jurisdictions with similar primary care-led health services. This study investigates primary care physician (PCP) behaviour and systems that may contribute to the timeliness of investigating for cancer and subsequently, international survival differences. DESIGN: A validated survey administered to PCPs via the internet set out in two parts: direct questions on primary care structure and practice relating to cancer diagnosis, and clinical vignettes, assessing management of scenarios relating to the diagnosis of lung, colorectal or ovarian cancer. PARTICIPANTS: 2795 PCPs in 11 jurisdictions: New South Wales and Victoria (Australia), British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario (Canada), England, Northern Ireland, Wales (UK), Denmark, Norway and Sweden. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Analysis compared the cumulative proportion of PCPs in each jurisdiction opting to investigate or refer at each phase for each vignette with 1-year survival, and conditional 5-year survival rates for the relevant cancer and jurisdiction. Logistic regression was used to explore whether PCP characteristics or system differences in each jurisdiction affected the readiness to investigate. RESULTS: 4 of 5 vignettes showed a statistically significant correlation (p<0.05 or better) between readiness to investigate or refer to secondary care at the first phase of each vignette and cancer survival rates for that jurisdiction. No consistent associations were found between readiness to investigate and selected PCP demographics, practice or health system variables. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate a correlation between the readiness of PCPs to investigate symptoms indicative of cancer and cancer survival rates, one of the first possible explanations for the variation in cancer survival between ICBP countries. No specific health system features consistently explained these findings. Some jurisdictions may consider lowering thresholds for PCPs to investigate for cancer—either directly, or by specialist referral, to improve outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4452748 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44527482015-06-08 Explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: a primary care vignette survey Rose, Peter W Rubin, Greg Perera-Salazar, Rafael Almberg, Sigrun Saur Barisic, Andriana Dawes, Martin Grunfeld, Eva Hart, Nigel Neal, Richard D Pirotta, Marie Sisler, Jeffrey Konrad, Gerald Toftegaard, Berit Skjødeberg Thulesius, Hans Vedsted, Peter Young, Jane Hamilton, Willie BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) is a collaboration between 6 countries and 12 jurisdictions with similar primary care-led health services. This study investigates primary care physician (PCP) behaviour and systems that may contribute to the timeliness of investigating for cancer and subsequently, international survival differences. DESIGN: A validated survey administered to PCPs via the internet set out in two parts: direct questions on primary care structure and practice relating to cancer diagnosis, and clinical vignettes, assessing management of scenarios relating to the diagnosis of lung, colorectal or ovarian cancer. PARTICIPANTS: 2795 PCPs in 11 jurisdictions: New South Wales and Victoria (Australia), British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario (Canada), England, Northern Ireland, Wales (UK), Denmark, Norway and Sweden. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Analysis compared the cumulative proportion of PCPs in each jurisdiction opting to investigate or refer at each phase for each vignette with 1-year survival, and conditional 5-year survival rates for the relevant cancer and jurisdiction. Logistic regression was used to explore whether PCP characteristics or system differences in each jurisdiction affected the readiness to investigate. RESULTS: 4 of 5 vignettes showed a statistically significant correlation (p<0.05 or better) between readiness to investigate or refer to secondary care at the first phase of each vignette and cancer survival rates for that jurisdiction. No consistent associations were found between readiness to investigate and selected PCP demographics, practice or health system variables. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate a correlation between the readiness of PCPs to investigate symptoms indicative of cancer and cancer survival rates, one of the first possible explanations for the variation in cancer survival between ICBP countries. No specific health system features consistently explained these findings. Some jurisdictions may consider lowering thresholds for PCPs to investigate for cancer—either directly, or by specialist referral, to improve outcomes. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4452748/ /pubmed/26017370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007212 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Rose, Peter W Rubin, Greg Perera-Salazar, Rafael Almberg, Sigrun Saur Barisic, Andriana Dawes, Martin Grunfeld, Eva Hart, Nigel Neal, Richard D Pirotta, Marie Sisler, Jeffrey Konrad, Gerald Toftegaard, Berit Skjødeberg Thulesius, Hans Vedsted, Peter Young, Jane Hamilton, Willie Explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: a primary care vignette survey |
title | Explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: a primary care vignette survey |
title_full | Explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: a primary care vignette survey |
title_fullStr | Explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: a primary care vignette survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: a primary care vignette survey |
title_short | Explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: a primary care vignette survey |
title_sort | explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the international cancer benchmarking partnership: a primary care vignette survey |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4452748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26017370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007212 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosepeterw explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey AT rubingreg explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey AT pererasalazarrafael explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey AT almbergsigrunsaur explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey AT barisicandriana explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey AT dawesmartin explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey AT grunfeldeva explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey AT hartnigel explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey AT nealrichardd explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey AT pirottamarie explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey AT sislerjeffrey explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey AT konradgerald explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey AT toftegaardberitskjødeberg explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey AT thulesiushans explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey AT vedstedpeter explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey AT youngjane explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey AT hamiltonwillie explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey AT explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey |