Cargando…

Explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: a primary care vignette survey

OBJECTIVES: The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) is a collaboration between 6 countries and 12 jurisdictions with similar primary care-led health services. This study investigates primary care physician (PCP) behaviour and systems that may contribute to the timeliness of investig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rose, Peter W, Rubin, Greg, Perera-Salazar, Rafael, Almberg, Sigrun Saur, Barisic, Andriana, Dawes, Martin, Grunfeld, Eva, Hart, Nigel, Neal, Richard D, Pirotta, Marie, Sisler, Jeffrey, Konrad, Gerald, Toftegaard, Berit Skjødeberg, Thulesius, Hans, Vedsted, Peter, Young, Jane, Hamilton, Willie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4452748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26017370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007212
_version_ 1782374354359681024
author Rose, Peter W
Rubin, Greg
Perera-Salazar, Rafael
Almberg, Sigrun Saur
Barisic, Andriana
Dawes, Martin
Grunfeld, Eva
Hart, Nigel
Neal, Richard D
Pirotta, Marie
Sisler, Jeffrey
Konrad, Gerald
Toftegaard, Berit Skjødeberg
Thulesius, Hans
Vedsted, Peter
Young, Jane
Hamilton, Willie
author_facet Rose, Peter W
Rubin, Greg
Perera-Salazar, Rafael
Almberg, Sigrun Saur
Barisic, Andriana
Dawes, Martin
Grunfeld, Eva
Hart, Nigel
Neal, Richard D
Pirotta, Marie
Sisler, Jeffrey
Konrad, Gerald
Toftegaard, Berit Skjødeberg
Thulesius, Hans
Vedsted, Peter
Young, Jane
Hamilton, Willie
author_sort Rose, Peter W
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) is a collaboration between 6 countries and 12 jurisdictions with similar primary care-led health services. This study investigates primary care physician (PCP) behaviour and systems that may contribute to the timeliness of investigating for cancer and subsequently, international survival differences. DESIGN: A validated survey administered to PCPs via the internet set out in two parts: direct questions on primary care structure and practice relating to cancer diagnosis, and clinical vignettes, assessing management of scenarios relating to the diagnosis of lung, colorectal or ovarian cancer. PARTICIPANTS: 2795 PCPs in 11 jurisdictions: New South Wales and Victoria (Australia), British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario (Canada), England, Northern Ireland, Wales (UK), Denmark, Norway and Sweden. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Analysis compared the cumulative proportion of PCPs in each jurisdiction opting to investigate or refer at each phase for each vignette with 1-year survival, and conditional 5-year survival rates for the relevant cancer and jurisdiction. Logistic regression was used to explore whether PCP characteristics or system differences in each jurisdiction affected the readiness to investigate. RESULTS: 4 of 5 vignettes showed a statistically significant correlation (p<0.05 or better) between readiness to investigate or refer to secondary care at the first phase of each vignette and cancer survival rates for that jurisdiction. No consistent associations were found between readiness to investigate and selected PCP demographics, practice or health system variables. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate a correlation between the readiness of PCPs to investigate symptoms indicative of cancer and cancer survival rates, one of the first possible explanations for the variation in cancer survival between ICBP countries. No specific health system features consistently explained these findings. Some jurisdictions may consider lowering thresholds for PCPs to investigate for cancer—either directly, or by specialist referral, to improve outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4452748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44527482015-06-08 Explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: a primary care vignette survey Rose, Peter W Rubin, Greg Perera-Salazar, Rafael Almberg, Sigrun Saur Barisic, Andriana Dawes, Martin Grunfeld, Eva Hart, Nigel Neal, Richard D Pirotta, Marie Sisler, Jeffrey Konrad, Gerald Toftegaard, Berit Skjødeberg Thulesius, Hans Vedsted, Peter Young, Jane Hamilton, Willie BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) is a collaboration between 6 countries and 12 jurisdictions with similar primary care-led health services. This study investigates primary care physician (PCP) behaviour and systems that may contribute to the timeliness of investigating for cancer and subsequently, international survival differences. DESIGN: A validated survey administered to PCPs via the internet set out in two parts: direct questions on primary care structure and practice relating to cancer diagnosis, and clinical vignettes, assessing management of scenarios relating to the diagnosis of lung, colorectal or ovarian cancer. PARTICIPANTS: 2795 PCPs in 11 jurisdictions: New South Wales and Victoria (Australia), British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario (Canada), England, Northern Ireland, Wales (UK), Denmark, Norway and Sweden. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Analysis compared the cumulative proportion of PCPs in each jurisdiction opting to investigate or refer at each phase for each vignette with 1-year survival, and conditional 5-year survival rates for the relevant cancer and jurisdiction. Logistic regression was used to explore whether PCP characteristics or system differences in each jurisdiction affected the readiness to investigate. RESULTS: 4 of 5 vignettes showed a statistically significant correlation (p<0.05 or better) between readiness to investigate or refer to secondary care at the first phase of each vignette and cancer survival rates for that jurisdiction. No consistent associations were found between readiness to investigate and selected PCP demographics, practice or health system variables. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate a correlation between the readiness of PCPs to investigate symptoms indicative of cancer and cancer survival rates, one of the first possible explanations for the variation in cancer survival between ICBP countries. No specific health system features consistently explained these findings. Some jurisdictions may consider lowering thresholds for PCPs to investigate for cancer—either directly, or by specialist referral, to improve outcomes. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4452748/ /pubmed/26017370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007212 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle General practice / Family practice
Rose, Peter W
Rubin, Greg
Perera-Salazar, Rafael
Almberg, Sigrun Saur
Barisic, Andriana
Dawes, Martin
Grunfeld, Eva
Hart, Nigel
Neal, Richard D
Pirotta, Marie
Sisler, Jeffrey
Konrad, Gerald
Toftegaard, Berit Skjødeberg
Thulesius, Hans
Vedsted, Peter
Young, Jane
Hamilton, Willie
Explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: a primary care vignette survey
title Explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: a primary care vignette survey
title_full Explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: a primary care vignette survey
title_fullStr Explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: a primary care vignette survey
title_full_unstemmed Explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: a primary care vignette survey
title_short Explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: a primary care vignette survey
title_sort explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the international cancer benchmarking partnership: a primary care vignette survey
topic General practice / Family practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4452748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26017370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007212
work_keys_str_mv AT rosepeterw explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey
AT rubingreg explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey
AT pererasalazarrafael explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey
AT almbergsigrunsaur explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey
AT barisicandriana explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey
AT dawesmartin explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey
AT grunfeldeva explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey
AT hartnigel explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey
AT nealrichardd explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey
AT pirottamarie explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey
AT sislerjeffrey explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey
AT konradgerald explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey
AT toftegaardberitskjødeberg explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey
AT thulesiushans explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey
AT vedstedpeter explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey
AT youngjane explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey
AT hamiltonwillie explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey
AT explainingvariationincancersurvivalbetween11jurisdictionsintheinternationalcancerbenchmarkingpartnershipaprimarycarevignettesurvey