Cargando…
10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes?
Reading is not only “cold” information processing, but involves affective and aesthetic processes that go far beyond what current models of word recognition, sentence processing, or text comprehension can explain. To investigate such “hot” reading processes, standardized instruments that quantify bo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4452804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26089808 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00714 |
_version_ | 1782374367344197632 |
---|---|
author | Jacobs, Arthur M. Võ, Melissa L.-H. Briesemeister, Benny B. Conrad, Markus Hofmann, Markus J. Kuchinke, Lars Lüdtke, Jana Braun, Mario |
author_facet | Jacobs, Arthur M. Võ, Melissa L.-H. Briesemeister, Benny B. Conrad, Markus Hofmann, Markus J. Kuchinke, Lars Lüdtke, Jana Braun, Mario |
author_sort | Jacobs, Arthur M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Reading is not only “cold” information processing, but involves affective and aesthetic processes that go far beyond what current models of word recognition, sentence processing, or text comprehension can explain. To investigate such “hot” reading processes, standardized instruments that quantify both psycholinguistic and emotional variables at the sublexical, lexical, inter-, and supralexical levels (e.g., phonological iconicity, word valence, arousal-span, or passage suspense) are necessary. One such instrument, the Berlin Affective Word List (BAWL) has been used in over 50 published studies demonstrating effects of lexical emotional variables on all relevant processing levels (experiential, behavioral, neuronal). In this paper, we first present new data from several BAWL studies. Together, these studies examine various views on affective effects in reading arising from dimensional (e.g., valence) and discrete emotion features (e.g., happiness), or embodied cognition features like smelling. Second, we extend our investigation of the complex issue of affective word processing to words characterized by a mixture of affects. These words entail positive and negative valence, and/or features making them beautiful or ugly. Finally, we discuss tentative neurocognitive models of affective word processing in the light of the present results, raising new issues for future studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4452804 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44528042015-06-18 10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes? Jacobs, Arthur M. Võ, Melissa L.-H. Briesemeister, Benny B. Conrad, Markus Hofmann, Markus J. Kuchinke, Lars Lüdtke, Jana Braun, Mario Front Psychol Psychology Reading is not only “cold” information processing, but involves affective and aesthetic processes that go far beyond what current models of word recognition, sentence processing, or text comprehension can explain. To investigate such “hot” reading processes, standardized instruments that quantify both psycholinguistic and emotional variables at the sublexical, lexical, inter-, and supralexical levels (e.g., phonological iconicity, word valence, arousal-span, or passage suspense) are necessary. One such instrument, the Berlin Affective Word List (BAWL) has been used in over 50 published studies demonstrating effects of lexical emotional variables on all relevant processing levels (experiential, behavioral, neuronal). In this paper, we first present new data from several BAWL studies. Together, these studies examine various views on affective effects in reading arising from dimensional (e.g., valence) and discrete emotion features (e.g., happiness), or embodied cognition features like smelling. Second, we extend our investigation of the complex issue of affective word processing to words characterized by a mixture of affects. These words entail positive and negative valence, and/or features making them beautiful or ugly. Finally, we discuss tentative neurocognitive models of affective word processing in the light of the present results, raising new issues for future studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4452804/ /pubmed/26089808 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00714 Text en Copyright © 2015 Jacobs, Võ, Briesemeister, Conrad, Hofmann, Kuchinke, Lüdtke and Braun. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Jacobs, Arthur M. Võ, Melissa L.-H. Briesemeister, Benny B. Conrad, Markus Hofmann, Markus J. Kuchinke, Lars Lüdtke, Jana Braun, Mario 10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes? |
title | 10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes? |
title_full | 10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes? |
title_fullStr | 10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes? |
title_full_unstemmed | 10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes? |
title_short | 10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes? |
title_sort | 10 years of bawling into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes? |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4452804/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26089808 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00714 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jacobsarthurm 10yearsofbawlingintoaffectiveandaestheticprocessesinreadingwhataretheechoes AT vomelissalh 10yearsofbawlingintoaffectiveandaestheticprocessesinreadingwhataretheechoes AT briesemeisterbennyb 10yearsofbawlingintoaffectiveandaestheticprocessesinreadingwhataretheechoes AT conradmarkus 10yearsofbawlingintoaffectiveandaestheticprocessesinreadingwhataretheechoes AT hofmannmarkusj 10yearsofbawlingintoaffectiveandaestheticprocessesinreadingwhataretheechoes AT kuchinkelars 10yearsofbawlingintoaffectiveandaestheticprocessesinreadingwhataretheechoes AT ludtkejana 10yearsofbawlingintoaffectiveandaestheticprocessesinreadingwhataretheechoes AT braunmario 10yearsofbawlingintoaffectiveandaestheticprocessesinreadingwhataretheechoes |