Cargando…

Continuous central venous oxygen saturation assisted intraoperative hemodynamic management during major abdominal surgery: a randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Major abdominal surgery is associated with significant risk of morbidity and mortality in the perioperative period. Optimising intraoperative fluid administration may result in improved outcomes. Our aim was to compare the effects of central venous pressure (CVP), and central venous oxyg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mikor, András, Trásy, Domonkos, Németh, Márton F, Osztroluczki, Angelika, Kocsi, Szilvia, Kovács, Ildikó, Demeter, Gábor, Molnár, Zsolt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4453106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26041437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-015-0064-2
_version_ 1782374413054771200
author Mikor, András
Trásy, Domonkos
Németh, Márton F
Osztroluczki, Angelika
Kocsi, Szilvia
Kovács, Ildikó
Demeter, Gábor
Molnár, Zsolt
author_facet Mikor, András
Trásy, Domonkos
Németh, Márton F
Osztroluczki, Angelika
Kocsi, Szilvia
Kovács, Ildikó
Demeter, Gábor
Molnár, Zsolt
author_sort Mikor, András
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Major abdominal surgery is associated with significant risk of morbidity and mortality in the perioperative period. Optimising intraoperative fluid administration may result in improved outcomes. Our aim was to compare the effects of central venous pressure (CVP), and central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO(2))-assisted fluid therapy on postoperative complications in patients undergoing high risk surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery were randomised into control and ScvO(2) groups. The target level of mean arterial pressure (MAP) was ≥ 60 mmHg in both groups. In cases of MAP < 60 mmHg patients received either a fluid or vasopressor bolus according to the CVP < 8 mmHg in the control group. In the ScvO(2) group, in addition to the MAP, an ScvO(2) of <75 % or a >3 % decrease indicated need for intervention, regardless of the actual MAP. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range). RESULTS: We observed a lower number of patients with complications in the ScvO(2) group compared to the control group, however it did not reach statistical significance (ScvO(2) group: 10 vs. control group: 19; p = 0.07). Patients in the ScvO(2) group (n = 38) received more colloids compared to the control group (n = 41) [279(161) vs. 107(250) ml/h; p < 0.001]. Both groups received similar amounts of crystalloid (1126 ± 471 vs. 1049 ± 431 ml/h; p = 0.46) and norepinephrine [37(107) vs. 18(73) mcg/h; p = 0.84]. Despite similar blood loss in both groups, the ScvO(2) group received more blood transfusions (63 % vs. 37 %; p = 0.018). More patients in the control group had a postoperative PaO(2)/FiO(2) < 200 mmHg (23 vs. 10, p < 0.01). Twenty eight day survival was significantly higher in the ScvO(2) group (37/38 vs. 33/41 p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: ScvO(2)-assisted intraoperative haemodynamic support provided some benefits, including significantly better postoperative oxygenation and 28 day survival rate, compared to CVP-assisted therapy without a significant effect on postoperative complications during major abdominal surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02337010.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4453106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44531062015-06-04 Continuous central venous oxygen saturation assisted intraoperative hemodynamic management during major abdominal surgery: a randomized, controlled trial Mikor, András Trásy, Domonkos Németh, Márton F Osztroluczki, Angelika Kocsi, Szilvia Kovács, Ildikó Demeter, Gábor Molnár, Zsolt BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Major abdominal surgery is associated with significant risk of morbidity and mortality in the perioperative period. Optimising intraoperative fluid administration may result in improved outcomes. Our aim was to compare the effects of central venous pressure (CVP), and central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO(2))-assisted fluid therapy on postoperative complications in patients undergoing high risk surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery were randomised into control and ScvO(2) groups. The target level of mean arterial pressure (MAP) was ≥ 60 mmHg in both groups. In cases of MAP < 60 mmHg patients received either a fluid or vasopressor bolus according to the CVP < 8 mmHg in the control group. In the ScvO(2) group, in addition to the MAP, an ScvO(2) of <75 % or a >3 % decrease indicated need for intervention, regardless of the actual MAP. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range). RESULTS: We observed a lower number of patients with complications in the ScvO(2) group compared to the control group, however it did not reach statistical significance (ScvO(2) group: 10 vs. control group: 19; p = 0.07). Patients in the ScvO(2) group (n = 38) received more colloids compared to the control group (n = 41) [279(161) vs. 107(250) ml/h; p < 0.001]. Both groups received similar amounts of crystalloid (1126 ± 471 vs. 1049 ± 431 ml/h; p = 0.46) and norepinephrine [37(107) vs. 18(73) mcg/h; p = 0.84]. Despite similar blood loss in both groups, the ScvO(2) group received more blood transfusions (63 % vs. 37 %; p = 0.018). More patients in the control group had a postoperative PaO(2)/FiO(2) < 200 mmHg (23 vs. 10, p < 0.01). Twenty eight day survival was significantly higher in the ScvO(2) group (37/38 vs. 33/41 p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: ScvO(2)-assisted intraoperative haemodynamic support provided some benefits, including significantly better postoperative oxygenation and 28 day survival rate, compared to CVP-assisted therapy without a significant effect on postoperative complications during major abdominal surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02337010. BioMed Central 2015-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4453106/ /pubmed/26041437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-015-0064-2 Text en © Mikor et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mikor, András
Trásy, Domonkos
Németh, Márton F
Osztroluczki, Angelika
Kocsi, Szilvia
Kovács, Ildikó
Demeter, Gábor
Molnár, Zsolt
Continuous central venous oxygen saturation assisted intraoperative hemodynamic management during major abdominal surgery: a randomized, controlled trial
title Continuous central venous oxygen saturation assisted intraoperative hemodynamic management during major abdominal surgery: a randomized, controlled trial
title_full Continuous central venous oxygen saturation assisted intraoperative hemodynamic management during major abdominal surgery: a randomized, controlled trial
title_fullStr Continuous central venous oxygen saturation assisted intraoperative hemodynamic management during major abdominal surgery: a randomized, controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Continuous central venous oxygen saturation assisted intraoperative hemodynamic management during major abdominal surgery: a randomized, controlled trial
title_short Continuous central venous oxygen saturation assisted intraoperative hemodynamic management during major abdominal surgery: a randomized, controlled trial
title_sort continuous central venous oxygen saturation assisted intraoperative hemodynamic management during major abdominal surgery: a randomized, controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4453106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26041437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-015-0064-2
work_keys_str_mv AT mikorandras continuouscentralvenousoxygensaturationassistedintraoperativehemodynamicmanagementduringmajorabdominalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT trasydomonkos continuouscentralvenousoxygensaturationassistedintraoperativehemodynamicmanagementduringmajorabdominalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nemethmartonf continuouscentralvenousoxygensaturationassistedintraoperativehemodynamicmanagementduringmajorabdominalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT osztroluczkiangelika continuouscentralvenousoxygensaturationassistedintraoperativehemodynamicmanagementduringmajorabdominalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kocsiszilvia continuouscentralvenousoxygensaturationassistedintraoperativehemodynamicmanagementduringmajorabdominalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kovacsildiko continuouscentralvenousoxygensaturationassistedintraoperativehemodynamicmanagementduringmajorabdominalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT demetergabor continuouscentralvenousoxygensaturationassistedintraoperativehemodynamicmanagementduringmajorabdominalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT molnarzsolt continuouscentralvenousoxygensaturationassistedintraoperativehemodynamicmanagementduringmajorabdominalsurgeryarandomizedcontrolledtrial