Cargando…

A model for non-monotonic intensity coding

Peripheral neurons of most sensory systems increase their response with increasing stimulus intensity. Behavioural responses, however, can be specific to some intermediate intensity level whose particular value might be innate or associatively learned. Learning such a preference requires an adjustab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nehrkorn, Johannes, Tanimoto, Hiromu, Herz, Andreas V. M., Yarali, Ayse
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4453257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26064666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150120
_version_ 1782374437582012416
author Nehrkorn, Johannes
Tanimoto, Hiromu
Herz, Andreas V. M.
Yarali, Ayse
author_facet Nehrkorn, Johannes
Tanimoto, Hiromu
Herz, Andreas V. M.
Yarali, Ayse
author_sort Nehrkorn, Johannes
collection PubMed
description Peripheral neurons of most sensory systems increase their response with increasing stimulus intensity. Behavioural responses, however, can be specific to some intermediate intensity level whose particular value might be innate or associatively learned. Learning such a preference requires an adjustable trans- formation from a monotonic stimulus representation at the sensory periphery to a non-monotonic representation for the motor command. How do neural systems accomplish this task? We tackle this general question focusing on odour-intensity learning in the fruit fly, whose first- and second-order olfactory neurons show monotonic stimulus–response curves. Nevertheless, flies form associative memories specific to particular trained odour intensities. Thus, downstream of the first two olfactory processing layers, odour intensity must be re-coded to enable intensity-specific associative learning. We present a minimal, feed-forward, three-layer circuit, which implements the required transformation by combining excitation, inhibition, and, as a decisive third element, homeostatic plasticity. Key features of this circuit motif are consistent with the known architecture and physiology of the fly olfactory system, whereas alternative mechanisms are either not composed of simple, scalable building blocks or not compatible with physiological observations. The simplicity of the circuit and the robustness of its function under parameter changes make this computational motif an attractive candidate for tuneable non-monotonic intensity coding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4453257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Royal Society Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44532572015-06-10 A model for non-monotonic intensity coding Nehrkorn, Johannes Tanimoto, Hiromu Herz, Andreas V. M. Yarali, Ayse R Soc Open Sci Biology (Whole Organism) Peripheral neurons of most sensory systems increase their response with increasing stimulus intensity. Behavioural responses, however, can be specific to some intermediate intensity level whose particular value might be innate or associatively learned. Learning such a preference requires an adjustable trans- formation from a monotonic stimulus representation at the sensory periphery to a non-monotonic representation for the motor command. How do neural systems accomplish this task? We tackle this general question focusing on odour-intensity learning in the fruit fly, whose first- and second-order olfactory neurons show monotonic stimulus–response curves. Nevertheless, flies form associative memories specific to particular trained odour intensities. Thus, downstream of the first two olfactory processing layers, odour intensity must be re-coded to enable intensity-specific associative learning. We present a minimal, feed-forward, three-layer circuit, which implements the required transformation by combining excitation, inhibition, and, as a decisive third element, homeostatic plasticity. Key features of this circuit motif are consistent with the known architecture and physiology of the fly olfactory system, whereas alternative mechanisms are either not composed of simple, scalable building blocks or not compatible with physiological observations. The simplicity of the circuit and the robustness of its function under parameter changes make this computational motif an attractive candidate for tuneable non-monotonic intensity coding. The Royal Society Publishing 2015-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4453257/ /pubmed/26064666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150120 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ © 2015 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Biology (Whole Organism)
Nehrkorn, Johannes
Tanimoto, Hiromu
Herz, Andreas V. M.
Yarali, Ayse
A model for non-monotonic intensity coding
title A model for non-monotonic intensity coding
title_full A model for non-monotonic intensity coding
title_fullStr A model for non-monotonic intensity coding
title_full_unstemmed A model for non-monotonic intensity coding
title_short A model for non-monotonic intensity coding
title_sort model for non-monotonic intensity coding
topic Biology (Whole Organism)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4453257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26064666
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150120
work_keys_str_mv AT nehrkornjohannes amodelfornonmonotonicintensitycoding
AT tanimotohiromu amodelfornonmonotonicintensitycoding
AT herzandreasvm amodelfornonmonotonicintensitycoding
AT yaraliayse amodelfornonmonotonicintensitycoding
AT nehrkornjohannes modelfornonmonotonicintensitycoding
AT tanimotohiromu modelfornonmonotonicintensitycoding
AT herzandreasvm modelfornonmonotonicintensitycoding
AT yaraliayse modelfornonmonotonicintensitycoding