Cargando…

The PRONE score: an algorithm for predicting doctors’ risks of formal patient complaints using routinely collected administrative data

BACKGROUND: Medicolegal agencies—such as malpractice insurers, medical boards and complaints bodies—are mostly passive regulators; they react to episodes of substandard care, rather than intervening to prevent them. At least part of the explanation for this reactive role lies in the widely recognise...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spittal, Matthew J, Bismark, Marie M, Studdert, David M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4453507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25855664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003834
_version_ 1782374460138979328
author Spittal, Matthew J
Bismark, Marie M
Studdert, David M
author_facet Spittal, Matthew J
Bismark, Marie M
Studdert, David M
author_sort Spittal, Matthew J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medicolegal agencies—such as malpractice insurers, medical boards and complaints bodies—are mostly passive regulators; they react to episodes of substandard care, rather than intervening to prevent them. At least part of the explanation for this reactive role lies in the widely recognised difficulty of making robust predictions about medicolegal risk at the individual clinician level. We aimed to develop a simple, reliable scoring system for predicting Australian doctors’ risks of becoming the subject of repeated patient complaints. METHODS: Using routinely collected administrative data, we constructed a national sample of 13 849 formal complaints against 8424 doctors. The complaints were lodged by patients with state health service commissions in Australia over a 12-year period. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify predictors of subsequent complaints, defined as another complaint occurring within 2 years of an index complaint. Model estimates were then used to derive a simple predictive algorithm, designed for application at the doctor level. RESULTS: The PRONE (Predicted Risk Of New Event) score is a 22-point scoring system that indicates a doctor's future complaint risk based on four variables: a doctor's specialty and sex, the number of previous complaints and the time since the last complaint. The PRONE score performed well in predicting subsequent complaints, exhibiting strong validity and reliability and reasonable goodness of fit (c-statistic=0.70). CONCLUSIONS: The PRONE score appears to be a valid method for assessing individual doctors’ risks of attracting recurrent complaints. Regulators could harness such information to target quality improvement interventions, and prevent substandard care and patient dissatisfaction. The approach we describe should be replicable in other agencies that handle large numbers of patient complaints or malpractice claims.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4453507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44535072015-06-05 The PRONE score: an algorithm for predicting doctors’ risks of formal patient complaints using routinely collected administrative data Spittal, Matthew J Bismark, Marie M Studdert, David M BMJ Qual Saf Original Research BACKGROUND: Medicolegal agencies—such as malpractice insurers, medical boards and complaints bodies—are mostly passive regulators; they react to episodes of substandard care, rather than intervening to prevent them. At least part of the explanation for this reactive role lies in the widely recognised difficulty of making robust predictions about medicolegal risk at the individual clinician level. We aimed to develop a simple, reliable scoring system for predicting Australian doctors’ risks of becoming the subject of repeated patient complaints. METHODS: Using routinely collected administrative data, we constructed a national sample of 13 849 formal complaints against 8424 doctors. The complaints were lodged by patients with state health service commissions in Australia over a 12-year period. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify predictors of subsequent complaints, defined as another complaint occurring within 2 years of an index complaint. Model estimates were then used to derive a simple predictive algorithm, designed for application at the doctor level. RESULTS: The PRONE (Predicted Risk Of New Event) score is a 22-point scoring system that indicates a doctor's future complaint risk based on four variables: a doctor's specialty and sex, the number of previous complaints and the time since the last complaint. The PRONE score performed well in predicting subsequent complaints, exhibiting strong validity and reliability and reasonable goodness of fit (c-statistic=0.70). CONCLUSIONS: The PRONE score appears to be a valid method for assessing individual doctors’ risks of attracting recurrent complaints. Regulators could harness such information to target quality improvement interventions, and prevent substandard care and patient dissatisfaction. The approach we describe should be replicable in other agencies that handle large numbers of patient complaints or malpractice claims. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-06 2015-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4453507/ /pubmed/25855664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003834 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Research
Spittal, Matthew J
Bismark, Marie M
Studdert, David M
The PRONE score: an algorithm for predicting doctors’ risks of formal patient complaints using routinely collected administrative data
title The PRONE score: an algorithm for predicting doctors’ risks of formal patient complaints using routinely collected administrative data
title_full The PRONE score: an algorithm for predicting doctors’ risks of formal patient complaints using routinely collected administrative data
title_fullStr The PRONE score: an algorithm for predicting doctors’ risks of formal patient complaints using routinely collected administrative data
title_full_unstemmed The PRONE score: an algorithm for predicting doctors’ risks of formal patient complaints using routinely collected administrative data
title_short The PRONE score: an algorithm for predicting doctors’ risks of formal patient complaints using routinely collected administrative data
title_sort prone score: an algorithm for predicting doctors’ risks of formal patient complaints using routinely collected administrative data
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4453507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25855664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003834
work_keys_str_mv AT spittalmatthewj thepronescoreanalgorithmforpredictingdoctorsrisksofformalpatientcomplaintsusingroutinelycollectedadministrativedata
AT bismarkmariem thepronescoreanalgorithmforpredictingdoctorsrisksofformalpatientcomplaintsusingroutinelycollectedadministrativedata
AT studdertdavidm thepronescoreanalgorithmforpredictingdoctorsrisksofformalpatientcomplaintsusingroutinelycollectedadministrativedata
AT spittalmatthewj pronescoreanalgorithmforpredictingdoctorsrisksofformalpatientcomplaintsusingroutinelycollectedadministrativedata
AT bismarkmariem pronescoreanalgorithmforpredictingdoctorsrisksofformalpatientcomplaintsusingroutinelycollectedadministrativedata
AT studdertdavidm pronescoreanalgorithmforpredictingdoctorsrisksofformalpatientcomplaintsusingroutinelycollectedadministrativedata