Cargando…

Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer: are there differences between patients with de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer?

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the prognostic impact of time between primary breast cancer and diagnosis of distant metastasis (metastatic-free interval, MFI) on the survival of metastatic breast cancer patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer in 2007–2009 i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lobbezoo, D J A, van Kampen, R J W, Voogd, A C, Dercksen, M W, van den Berkmortel, F, Smilde, T J, van de Wouw, A J, Peters, F P J, van Riel, J M G H, Peters, N A J B, de Boer, M, Peer, P G M, Tjan-Heijnen, V C G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4453676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25880008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.127
_version_ 1782374499504619520
author Lobbezoo, D J A
van Kampen, R J W
Voogd, A C
Dercksen, M W
van den Berkmortel, F
Smilde, T J
van de Wouw, A J
Peters, F P J
van Riel, J M G H
Peters, N A J B
de Boer, M
Peer, P G M
Tjan-Heijnen, V C G
author_facet Lobbezoo, D J A
van Kampen, R J W
Voogd, A C
Dercksen, M W
van den Berkmortel, F
Smilde, T J
van de Wouw, A J
Peters, F P J
van Riel, J M G H
Peters, N A J B
de Boer, M
Peer, P G M
Tjan-Heijnen, V C G
author_sort Lobbezoo, D J A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the prognostic impact of time between primary breast cancer and diagnosis of distant metastasis (metastatic-free interval, MFI) on the survival of metastatic breast cancer patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer in 2007–2009 in eight hospitals in the Southeast of the Netherlands were included and categorised based on MFI. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the prognostic impact of de novo metastatic breast cancer vs recurrent metastatic breast cancer (MFI ⩽24 months and >24 months), adjusted for age, hormone receptor and HER2 status, initial site of metastasis and use of prior (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy. RESULTS: Eight hundred and fifteen patients were included and divided in three subgroups based on MFI; 154 patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer, 176 patients with MFI <24 months and 485 patients with MFI >24 months. Patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer had a prolonged survival compared with patients with recurrent metastatic breast cancer with MFI <24 months (median 29.4 vs 9.1 months, P<0.0001), but no difference in survival compared with patients with recurrent metastatic breast cancer with MFI >24 months (median, 29.4 vs 27.9 months, P=0.73). Adjusting for other prognostic factors, patients with MFI <24 months had increased mortality risk (hazard ratio 1.97, 95% CI 1.49–2.60, P<0.0001) compared with patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer. When comparing recurrent metastatic breast cancer with MFI >24 months with de novo metastatic breast cancer no significant difference in mortality risk was found. The association between MFI and survival was seen irrespective of use of (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy. CONCLUSION: Patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer had a significantly better outcome when compared with patients with MFI <24 months, irrespective of the use of prior adjuvant systemic therapy in the latter group. However, compared with patients with MFI >24 months, patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer had similar outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4453676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44536762016-04-28 Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer: are there differences between patients with de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer? Lobbezoo, D J A van Kampen, R J W Voogd, A C Dercksen, M W van den Berkmortel, F Smilde, T J van de Wouw, A J Peters, F P J van Riel, J M G H Peters, N A J B de Boer, M Peer, P G M Tjan-Heijnen, V C G Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the prognostic impact of time between primary breast cancer and diagnosis of distant metastasis (metastatic-free interval, MFI) on the survival of metastatic breast cancer patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer in 2007–2009 in eight hospitals in the Southeast of the Netherlands were included and categorised based on MFI. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the prognostic impact of de novo metastatic breast cancer vs recurrent metastatic breast cancer (MFI ⩽24 months and >24 months), adjusted for age, hormone receptor and HER2 status, initial site of metastasis and use of prior (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy. RESULTS: Eight hundred and fifteen patients were included and divided in three subgroups based on MFI; 154 patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer, 176 patients with MFI <24 months and 485 patients with MFI >24 months. Patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer had a prolonged survival compared with patients with recurrent metastatic breast cancer with MFI <24 months (median 29.4 vs 9.1 months, P<0.0001), but no difference in survival compared with patients with recurrent metastatic breast cancer with MFI >24 months (median, 29.4 vs 27.9 months, P=0.73). Adjusting for other prognostic factors, patients with MFI <24 months had increased mortality risk (hazard ratio 1.97, 95% CI 1.49–2.60, P<0.0001) compared with patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer. When comparing recurrent metastatic breast cancer with MFI >24 months with de novo metastatic breast cancer no significant difference in mortality risk was found. The association between MFI and survival was seen irrespective of use of (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy. CONCLUSION: Patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer had a significantly better outcome when compared with patients with MFI <24 months, irrespective of the use of prior adjuvant systemic therapy in the latter group. However, compared with patients with MFI >24 months, patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer had similar outcome. Nature Publishing Group 2015-04-28 2015-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4453676/ /pubmed/25880008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.127 Text en Copyright © 2015 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Lobbezoo, D J A
van Kampen, R J W
Voogd, A C
Dercksen, M W
van den Berkmortel, F
Smilde, T J
van de Wouw, A J
Peters, F P J
van Riel, J M G H
Peters, N A J B
de Boer, M
Peer, P G M
Tjan-Heijnen, V C G
Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer: are there differences between patients with de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer?
title Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer: are there differences between patients with de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer?
title_full Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer: are there differences between patients with de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer?
title_fullStr Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer: are there differences between patients with de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer?
title_full_unstemmed Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer: are there differences between patients with de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer?
title_short Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer: are there differences between patients with de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer?
title_sort prognosis of metastatic breast cancer: are there differences between patients with de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer?
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4453676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25880008
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.127
work_keys_str_mv AT lobbezoodja prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer
AT vankampenrjw prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer
AT voogdac prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer
AT dercksenmw prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer
AT vandenberkmortelf prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer
AT smildetj prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer
AT vandewouwaj prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer
AT petersfpj prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer
AT vanrieljmgh prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer
AT petersnajb prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer
AT deboerm prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer
AT peerpgm prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer
AT tjanheijnenvcg prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer