Cargando…
Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer: are there differences between patients with de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer?
BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the prognostic impact of time between primary breast cancer and diagnosis of distant metastasis (metastatic-free interval, MFI) on the survival of metastatic breast cancer patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer in 2007–2009 i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4453676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25880008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.127 |
_version_ | 1782374499504619520 |
---|---|
author | Lobbezoo, D J A van Kampen, R J W Voogd, A C Dercksen, M W van den Berkmortel, F Smilde, T J van de Wouw, A J Peters, F P J van Riel, J M G H Peters, N A J B de Boer, M Peer, P G M Tjan-Heijnen, V C G |
author_facet | Lobbezoo, D J A van Kampen, R J W Voogd, A C Dercksen, M W van den Berkmortel, F Smilde, T J van de Wouw, A J Peters, F P J van Riel, J M G H Peters, N A J B de Boer, M Peer, P G M Tjan-Heijnen, V C G |
author_sort | Lobbezoo, D J A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the prognostic impact of time between primary breast cancer and diagnosis of distant metastasis (metastatic-free interval, MFI) on the survival of metastatic breast cancer patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer in 2007–2009 in eight hospitals in the Southeast of the Netherlands were included and categorised based on MFI. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the prognostic impact of de novo metastatic breast cancer vs recurrent metastatic breast cancer (MFI ⩽24 months and >24 months), adjusted for age, hormone receptor and HER2 status, initial site of metastasis and use of prior (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy. RESULTS: Eight hundred and fifteen patients were included and divided in three subgroups based on MFI; 154 patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer, 176 patients with MFI <24 months and 485 patients with MFI >24 months. Patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer had a prolonged survival compared with patients with recurrent metastatic breast cancer with MFI <24 months (median 29.4 vs 9.1 months, P<0.0001), but no difference in survival compared with patients with recurrent metastatic breast cancer with MFI >24 months (median, 29.4 vs 27.9 months, P=0.73). Adjusting for other prognostic factors, patients with MFI <24 months had increased mortality risk (hazard ratio 1.97, 95% CI 1.49–2.60, P<0.0001) compared with patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer. When comparing recurrent metastatic breast cancer with MFI >24 months with de novo metastatic breast cancer no significant difference in mortality risk was found. The association between MFI and survival was seen irrespective of use of (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy. CONCLUSION: Patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer had a significantly better outcome when compared with patients with MFI <24 months, irrespective of the use of prior adjuvant systemic therapy in the latter group. However, compared with patients with MFI >24 months, patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer had similar outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4453676 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44536762016-04-28 Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer: are there differences between patients with de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer? Lobbezoo, D J A van Kampen, R J W Voogd, A C Dercksen, M W van den Berkmortel, F Smilde, T J van de Wouw, A J Peters, F P J van Riel, J M G H Peters, N A J B de Boer, M Peer, P G M Tjan-Heijnen, V C G Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the prognostic impact of time between primary breast cancer and diagnosis of distant metastasis (metastatic-free interval, MFI) on the survival of metastatic breast cancer patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer in 2007–2009 in eight hospitals in the Southeast of the Netherlands were included and categorised based on MFI. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the prognostic impact of de novo metastatic breast cancer vs recurrent metastatic breast cancer (MFI ⩽24 months and >24 months), adjusted for age, hormone receptor and HER2 status, initial site of metastasis and use of prior (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy. RESULTS: Eight hundred and fifteen patients were included and divided in three subgroups based on MFI; 154 patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer, 176 patients with MFI <24 months and 485 patients with MFI >24 months. Patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer had a prolonged survival compared with patients with recurrent metastatic breast cancer with MFI <24 months (median 29.4 vs 9.1 months, P<0.0001), but no difference in survival compared with patients with recurrent metastatic breast cancer with MFI >24 months (median, 29.4 vs 27.9 months, P=0.73). Adjusting for other prognostic factors, patients with MFI <24 months had increased mortality risk (hazard ratio 1.97, 95% CI 1.49–2.60, P<0.0001) compared with patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer. When comparing recurrent metastatic breast cancer with MFI >24 months with de novo metastatic breast cancer no significant difference in mortality risk was found. The association between MFI and survival was seen irrespective of use of (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy. CONCLUSION: Patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer had a significantly better outcome when compared with patients with MFI <24 months, irrespective of the use of prior adjuvant systemic therapy in the latter group. However, compared with patients with MFI >24 months, patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer had similar outcome. Nature Publishing Group 2015-04-28 2015-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4453676/ /pubmed/25880008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.127 Text en Copyright © 2015 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Lobbezoo, D J A van Kampen, R J W Voogd, A C Dercksen, M W van den Berkmortel, F Smilde, T J van de Wouw, A J Peters, F P J van Riel, J M G H Peters, N A J B de Boer, M Peer, P G M Tjan-Heijnen, V C G Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer: are there differences between patients with de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer? |
title | Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer: are there differences between patients with de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer? |
title_full | Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer: are there differences between patients with de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer? |
title_fullStr | Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer: are there differences between patients with de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer? |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer: are there differences between patients with de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer? |
title_short | Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer: are there differences between patients with de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer? |
title_sort | prognosis of metastatic breast cancer: are there differences between patients with de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer? |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4453676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25880008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.127 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lobbezoodja prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer AT vankampenrjw prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer AT voogdac prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer AT dercksenmw prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer AT vandenberkmortelf prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer AT smildetj prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer AT vandewouwaj prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer AT petersfpj prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer AT vanrieljmgh prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer AT petersnajb prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer AT deboerm prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer AT peerpgm prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer AT tjanheijnenvcg prognosisofmetastaticbreastcanceraretheredifferencesbetweenpatientswithdenovoandrecurrentmetastaticbreastcancer |