Cargando…

Nationwide bowel cancer screening programme in England: cohort study of lifestyle factors affecting participation and outcomes in women

BACKGROUND: In 2006, the National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England (NHSBCSP) began offering routine population-based biennial faecal occult blood testing (FOBt) at ages 60–69. There is, however, limited information on how characteristics of individuals affect participation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blanks, R G, Benson, V S, Alison, R, Brown, A, Reeves, G K, Beral, V, Patnick, J, Green, J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4453681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25742470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.69
_version_ 1782374500671684608
author Blanks, R G
Benson, V S
Alison, R
Brown, A
Reeves, G K
Beral, V
Patnick, J
Green, J
author_facet Blanks, R G
Benson, V S
Alison, R
Brown, A
Reeves, G K
Beral, V
Patnick, J
Green, J
author_sort Blanks, R G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2006, the National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England (NHSBCSP) began offering routine population-based biennial faecal occult blood testing (FOBt) at ages 60–69. There is, however, limited information on how characteristics of individuals affect participation and outcomes of screening, and we studied this association by linking NHSBCSP data to a large prospective cohort of women. METHODS: Electronic linkage of the NHSBCSP and Million Women Study records identified 899 166 women in the study cohort with at least one invitation for screening. NHSBCSP provided information on screening acceptance, FOBt results, screen-detected colorectal cancer and other outcomes. The Million Women Study provided prospectively collected information on personal and lifestyle factors. Multiple regression was used to estimate relative risks (RRs) of factors associated with acceptance and outcomes of screening. RESULTS: Overall, 70% of women (628 976/899 166) accepted their first invitation for bowel cancer screening, of whom 9133 (1.5%) were FOBt-positive, 743 (0.1%) had screen-detected colorectal cancer and 3056 (0.5%) had screen-detected colorectal adenoma. Acceptance was lower in women from the most than the least deprived tertile, in South Asians and in Blacks than in Whites, in current than in never smokers and in obese than in normal weight women: adjusted RRs (95% confidence interval) for acceptance vs not, 0.90 (0.90–0.90); 0.77 (0.75–79); 0.94 (0.92–0.96); 0.78 (0.77–0.78); and 0.88 (0.88–0.89), respectively: P<0.001 for each. These factors were also associated with an increased risk of being FOBt-positive and of having screen-detected adenoma, but were not strongly associated with the risk of screen-detected colorectal cancer. Relative risks for screen-detected adenoma were 1.22 (1.12–1.34), 2.46 (1.75–3.45), 1.61 (1.05–2.48), 1.53 (1.38–1.68) and 1.77 (1.60–1.95), respectively (P<0.001 for all, except for Blacks vs Whites P=0.03). Use of hormone therapy for menopause was associated with reduced risk of screen-detected adenoma, RR ever vs never use, 0.87 (0.81–0.93), P<0.001 and colorectal cancer, 0.78 (0.68–0.91), P=0.001. INTERPRETATION: Among women in England, socioeconomic and lifestyle factors strongly affect participation in routine bowel cancer screening, risk of being FOBt-positive and risk of having screen-detected colorectal adenoma. However, screen-detected colorectal cancer risk is not strongly related to these factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4453681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44536812016-04-28 Nationwide bowel cancer screening programme in England: cohort study of lifestyle factors affecting participation and outcomes in women Blanks, R G Benson, V S Alison, R Brown, A Reeves, G K Beral, V Patnick, J Green, J Br J Cancer Epidemiology BACKGROUND: In 2006, the National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England (NHSBCSP) began offering routine population-based biennial faecal occult blood testing (FOBt) at ages 60–69. There is, however, limited information on how characteristics of individuals affect participation and outcomes of screening, and we studied this association by linking NHSBCSP data to a large prospective cohort of women. METHODS: Electronic linkage of the NHSBCSP and Million Women Study records identified 899 166 women in the study cohort with at least one invitation for screening. NHSBCSP provided information on screening acceptance, FOBt results, screen-detected colorectal cancer and other outcomes. The Million Women Study provided prospectively collected information on personal and lifestyle factors. Multiple regression was used to estimate relative risks (RRs) of factors associated with acceptance and outcomes of screening. RESULTS: Overall, 70% of women (628 976/899 166) accepted their first invitation for bowel cancer screening, of whom 9133 (1.5%) were FOBt-positive, 743 (0.1%) had screen-detected colorectal cancer and 3056 (0.5%) had screen-detected colorectal adenoma. Acceptance was lower in women from the most than the least deprived tertile, in South Asians and in Blacks than in Whites, in current than in never smokers and in obese than in normal weight women: adjusted RRs (95% confidence interval) for acceptance vs not, 0.90 (0.90–0.90); 0.77 (0.75–79); 0.94 (0.92–0.96); 0.78 (0.77–0.78); and 0.88 (0.88–0.89), respectively: P<0.001 for each. These factors were also associated with an increased risk of being FOBt-positive and of having screen-detected adenoma, but were not strongly associated with the risk of screen-detected colorectal cancer. Relative risks for screen-detected adenoma were 1.22 (1.12–1.34), 2.46 (1.75–3.45), 1.61 (1.05–2.48), 1.53 (1.38–1.68) and 1.77 (1.60–1.95), respectively (P<0.001 for all, except for Blacks vs Whites P=0.03). Use of hormone therapy for menopause was associated with reduced risk of screen-detected adenoma, RR ever vs never use, 0.87 (0.81–0.93), P<0.001 and colorectal cancer, 0.78 (0.68–0.91), P=0.001. INTERPRETATION: Among women in England, socioeconomic and lifestyle factors strongly affect participation in routine bowel cancer screening, risk of being FOBt-positive and risk of having screen-detected colorectal adenoma. However, screen-detected colorectal cancer risk is not strongly related to these factors. Nature Publishing Group 2015-04-28 2015-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4453681/ /pubmed/25742470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.69 Text en Copyright © 2015 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Blanks, R G
Benson, V S
Alison, R
Brown, A
Reeves, G K
Beral, V
Patnick, J
Green, J
Nationwide bowel cancer screening programme in England: cohort study of lifestyle factors affecting participation and outcomes in women
title Nationwide bowel cancer screening programme in England: cohort study of lifestyle factors affecting participation and outcomes in women
title_full Nationwide bowel cancer screening programme in England: cohort study of lifestyle factors affecting participation and outcomes in women
title_fullStr Nationwide bowel cancer screening programme in England: cohort study of lifestyle factors affecting participation and outcomes in women
title_full_unstemmed Nationwide bowel cancer screening programme in England: cohort study of lifestyle factors affecting participation and outcomes in women
title_short Nationwide bowel cancer screening programme in England: cohort study of lifestyle factors affecting participation and outcomes in women
title_sort nationwide bowel cancer screening programme in england: cohort study of lifestyle factors affecting participation and outcomes in women
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4453681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25742470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.69
work_keys_str_mv AT blanksrg nationwidebowelcancerscreeningprogrammeinenglandcohortstudyoflifestylefactorsaffectingparticipationandoutcomesinwomen
AT bensonvs nationwidebowelcancerscreeningprogrammeinenglandcohortstudyoflifestylefactorsaffectingparticipationandoutcomesinwomen
AT alisonr nationwidebowelcancerscreeningprogrammeinenglandcohortstudyoflifestylefactorsaffectingparticipationandoutcomesinwomen
AT browna nationwidebowelcancerscreeningprogrammeinenglandcohortstudyoflifestylefactorsaffectingparticipationandoutcomesinwomen
AT reevesgk nationwidebowelcancerscreeningprogrammeinenglandcohortstudyoflifestylefactorsaffectingparticipationandoutcomesinwomen
AT beralv nationwidebowelcancerscreeningprogrammeinenglandcohortstudyoflifestylefactorsaffectingparticipationandoutcomesinwomen
AT patnickj nationwidebowelcancerscreeningprogrammeinenglandcohortstudyoflifestylefactorsaffectingparticipationandoutcomesinwomen
AT greenj nationwidebowelcancerscreeningprogrammeinenglandcohortstudyoflifestylefactorsaffectingparticipationandoutcomesinwomen