Cargando…
Nasal Sculpting: Calculated and Predictable Tip Elevation With Cephalic Trim
Background: Rhinoplasty techniques to affect nasal tip rotation are well described. Cephalic alar trim is a powerful method for achieving tip elevation. Previous studies and texts provide aesthetic guidelines for nasolabial angles. Often, surgeon experience determines the degree of lower lateral car...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Open Science Company, LLC
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4453984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26171091 |
_version_ | 1782374534980042752 |
---|---|
author | Redstone, Jeremiah S. Chowdhry, Saeed Nguyen, Jonathan North, Durham Alan Hazani, Ron Drury, Brad Yoder, Eric M. Cooperman, Ross D. Yoder, Virginia Little, Jarrod A. Florman, Larry D. Wilhelmi, Bradon J. |
author_facet | Redstone, Jeremiah S. Chowdhry, Saeed Nguyen, Jonathan North, Durham Alan Hazani, Ron Drury, Brad Yoder, Eric M. Cooperman, Ross D. Yoder, Virginia Little, Jarrod A. Florman, Larry D. Wilhelmi, Bradon J. |
author_sort | Redstone, Jeremiah S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Rhinoplasty techniques to affect nasal tip rotation are well described. Cephalic alar trim is a powerful method for achieving tip elevation. Previous studies and texts provide aesthetic guidelines for nasolabial angles. Often, surgeon experience determines the degree of lower lateral cartilage resection to achieve optimal results. This study analyzes the change in tip elevation with measured resections of the lower lateral cartilages. This can aid the surgeon in accurately predicting the effect of cephalic alar trim on tip elevation. Methods: Ten fresh cadaveric dissections were performed to determine the change in nasolabial angles after cephalic trim of the lower lateral cartilage. Closed rhinoplasty technique was performed using marginal and intercartilaginous incisions to expose the lower lateral cartilage. Caliper measurements of the lower lateral cartilage were recorded. Serial cephalic trim was performed in 25% increments. True lateral photographs were obtained before and after each serial excision. Nasolabial angle measurements were obtained using a digital goniometer for digital photo analysis. Results: Four female and 6 male cadavers were evaluated. The mean initial nasolabial angle was 106° ± 2°. The mean lower lateral cartilage width was 9.45 ± 1.38 mm. Serial 25% reductions in lower lateral cartilage height resulted in a mean total nasolabial angle change of 7.4°, 12.9°, and 19.6°, respectively. The mean incremental change in the nasolabial angle was 6.47° ± 1.25°. Conclusion: The nasolabial angle is an essential aesthetic feature. Cephalic trim is a key maneuver in affecting the nasolabial angle. A 25% lower lateral cartilage cephalic trim correlates with an average change in the nasolabial angle of 6.47°. Knowledge of the cephalic trim to nasolabial angle relationship aids in achieving desired tip elevation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4453984 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Open Science Company, LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44539842015-07-13 Nasal Sculpting: Calculated and Predictable Tip Elevation With Cephalic Trim Redstone, Jeremiah S. Chowdhry, Saeed Nguyen, Jonathan North, Durham Alan Hazani, Ron Drury, Brad Yoder, Eric M. Cooperman, Ross D. Yoder, Virginia Little, Jarrod A. Florman, Larry D. Wilhelmi, Bradon J. Eplasty Journal Article Background: Rhinoplasty techniques to affect nasal tip rotation are well described. Cephalic alar trim is a powerful method for achieving tip elevation. Previous studies and texts provide aesthetic guidelines for nasolabial angles. Often, surgeon experience determines the degree of lower lateral cartilage resection to achieve optimal results. This study analyzes the change in tip elevation with measured resections of the lower lateral cartilages. This can aid the surgeon in accurately predicting the effect of cephalic alar trim on tip elevation. Methods: Ten fresh cadaveric dissections were performed to determine the change in nasolabial angles after cephalic trim of the lower lateral cartilage. Closed rhinoplasty technique was performed using marginal and intercartilaginous incisions to expose the lower lateral cartilage. Caliper measurements of the lower lateral cartilage were recorded. Serial cephalic trim was performed in 25% increments. True lateral photographs were obtained before and after each serial excision. Nasolabial angle measurements were obtained using a digital goniometer for digital photo analysis. Results: Four female and 6 male cadavers were evaluated. The mean initial nasolabial angle was 106° ± 2°. The mean lower lateral cartilage width was 9.45 ± 1.38 mm. Serial 25% reductions in lower lateral cartilage height resulted in a mean total nasolabial angle change of 7.4°, 12.9°, and 19.6°, respectively. The mean incremental change in the nasolabial angle was 6.47° ± 1.25°. Conclusion: The nasolabial angle is an essential aesthetic feature. Cephalic trim is a key maneuver in affecting the nasolabial angle. A 25% lower lateral cartilage cephalic trim correlates with an average change in the nasolabial angle of 6.47°. Knowledge of the cephalic trim to nasolabial angle relationship aids in achieving desired tip elevation. Open Science Company, LLC 2015-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4453984/ /pubmed/26171091 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article whereby the authors retain copyright of the work. The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Journal Article Redstone, Jeremiah S. Chowdhry, Saeed Nguyen, Jonathan North, Durham Alan Hazani, Ron Drury, Brad Yoder, Eric M. Cooperman, Ross D. Yoder, Virginia Little, Jarrod A. Florman, Larry D. Wilhelmi, Bradon J. Nasal Sculpting: Calculated and Predictable Tip Elevation With Cephalic Trim |
title | Nasal Sculpting: Calculated and Predictable Tip Elevation With Cephalic Trim |
title_full | Nasal Sculpting: Calculated and Predictable Tip Elevation With Cephalic Trim |
title_fullStr | Nasal Sculpting: Calculated and Predictable Tip Elevation With Cephalic Trim |
title_full_unstemmed | Nasal Sculpting: Calculated and Predictable Tip Elevation With Cephalic Trim |
title_short | Nasal Sculpting: Calculated and Predictable Tip Elevation With Cephalic Trim |
title_sort | nasal sculpting: calculated and predictable tip elevation with cephalic trim |
topic | Journal Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4453984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26171091 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT redstonejeremiahs nasalsculptingcalculatedandpredictabletipelevationwithcephalictrim AT chowdhrysaeed nasalsculptingcalculatedandpredictabletipelevationwithcephalictrim AT nguyenjonathan nasalsculptingcalculatedandpredictabletipelevationwithcephalictrim AT northdurhamalan nasalsculptingcalculatedandpredictabletipelevationwithcephalictrim AT hazaniron nasalsculptingcalculatedandpredictabletipelevationwithcephalictrim AT drurybrad nasalsculptingcalculatedandpredictabletipelevationwithcephalictrim AT yoderericm nasalsculptingcalculatedandpredictabletipelevationwithcephalictrim AT coopermanrossd nasalsculptingcalculatedandpredictabletipelevationwithcephalictrim AT yodervirginia nasalsculptingcalculatedandpredictabletipelevationwithcephalictrim AT littlejarroda nasalsculptingcalculatedandpredictabletipelevationwithcephalictrim AT flormanlarryd nasalsculptingcalculatedandpredictabletipelevationwithcephalictrim AT wilhelmibradonj nasalsculptingcalculatedandpredictabletipelevationwithcephalictrim |