Cargando…

Mydriasert pupillary dilation for cataract surgery: an economic and clinical study

BACKGROUND: Mydriasert is an insoluble ophthalmic insert indicated for mydriasis prior to cataract surgery, which gradually releases the active ingredients: tropicamide (0.25 mg) and phenylephrine (5.38 mg). This study aimed to evaluate the cost of Mydriasert compared with conventional mydriatic eye...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shah, Ameet, Johal, Sukhvinder, Lee, Nicholas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4454272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26036871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0042-y
_version_ 1782374580730462208
author Shah, Ameet
Johal, Sukhvinder
Lee, Nicholas
author_facet Shah, Ameet
Johal, Sukhvinder
Lee, Nicholas
author_sort Shah, Ameet
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mydriasert is an insoluble ophthalmic insert indicated for mydriasis prior to cataract surgery, which gradually releases the active ingredients: tropicamide (0.25 mg) and phenylephrine (5.38 mg). This study aimed to evaluate the cost of Mydriasert compared with conventional mydriatic eye drops to induce pupil dilation prior to cataract surgery using a budget impact model. METHODS: A cohort-based, decision tree, budget impact model was developed to estimate the drug, consumable and staff costs for achieving mydriasis with Mydriasert compared to mydriatic eye drops (tropicamide [1 %] plus phenylephrine [10 %]). Insights from structured interviews with clinicians (n = 5) experienced in using both Mydriasert and mydriatic eye drops and results from the current clinical study of patients undergoing cataract surgery (n = 144) at a Greater London district general hospital were used to obtain key input parameters for the model, and to validate the model approach. RESULTS: The base case analysis in a cohort of 1763 patients undergoing cataract surgery showed that when Mydriasert substituted mydriatic eye drops, annual total costs decreased by 18 % and annual total nurse time decreased from 235.1 hours to 44.1 hours over one year (2012–2013). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that despite its higher unit cost than mydriatic eye drops, Mydriasert resulted in overall savings in health-care costs, mainly associated with reduced nursing time. The economic model developed could assist National Health Service managers and local payers to estimate the budget impact of the introduction of Mydriasert into different clinical settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4454272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44542722015-06-04 Mydriasert pupillary dilation for cataract surgery: an economic and clinical study Shah, Ameet Johal, Sukhvinder Lee, Nicholas BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: Mydriasert is an insoluble ophthalmic insert indicated for mydriasis prior to cataract surgery, which gradually releases the active ingredients: tropicamide (0.25 mg) and phenylephrine (5.38 mg). This study aimed to evaluate the cost of Mydriasert compared with conventional mydriatic eye drops to induce pupil dilation prior to cataract surgery using a budget impact model. METHODS: A cohort-based, decision tree, budget impact model was developed to estimate the drug, consumable and staff costs for achieving mydriasis with Mydriasert compared to mydriatic eye drops (tropicamide [1 %] plus phenylephrine [10 %]). Insights from structured interviews with clinicians (n = 5) experienced in using both Mydriasert and mydriatic eye drops and results from the current clinical study of patients undergoing cataract surgery (n = 144) at a Greater London district general hospital were used to obtain key input parameters for the model, and to validate the model approach. RESULTS: The base case analysis in a cohort of 1763 patients undergoing cataract surgery showed that when Mydriasert substituted mydriatic eye drops, annual total costs decreased by 18 % and annual total nurse time decreased from 235.1 hours to 44.1 hours over one year (2012–2013). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that despite its higher unit cost than mydriatic eye drops, Mydriasert resulted in overall savings in health-care costs, mainly associated with reduced nursing time. The economic model developed could assist National Health Service managers and local payers to estimate the budget impact of the introduction of Mydriasert into different clinical settings. BioMed Central 2015-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4454272/ /pubmed/26036871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0042-y Text en © Shah et al. 2015
spellingShingle Research Article
Shah, Ameet
Johal, Sukhvinder
Lee, Nicholas
Mydriasert pupillary dilation for cataract surgery: an economic and clinical study
title Mydriasert pupillary dilation for cataract surgery: an economic and clinical study
title_full Mydriasert pupillary dilation for cataract surgery: an economic and clinical study
title_fullStr Mydriasert pupillary dilation for cataract surgery: an economic and clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Mydriasert pupillary dilation for cataract surgery: an economic and clinical study
title_short Mydriasert pupillary dilation for cataract surgery: an economic and clinical study
title_sort mydriasert pupillary dilation for cataract surgery: an economic and clinical study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4454272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26036871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0042-y
work_keys_str_mv AT shahameet mydriasertpupillarydilationforcataractsurgeryaneconomicandclinicalstudy
AT johalsukhvinder mydriasertpupillarydilationforcataractsurgeryaneconomicandclinicalstudy
AT leenicholas mydriasertpupillarydilationforcataractsurgeryaneconomicandclinicalstudy