Cargando…
Mammography Rates for Breast Cancer Screening: A Comparison of First Nations Women and All Other Women Living in Manitoba, Canada, 1999–2008
INTRODUCTION: First Nations (FN) women historically have low rates of preventive care, including breast cancer screening. We describe the frequency of breast cancer screening among FN women living in Manitoba and all other Manitoba (AOM) women after the introduction of a provincial, organized breast...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4454407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26020546 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd12.140571 |
_version_ | 1782374592216563712 |
---|---|
author | Demers, Alain A. Decker, Kathleen M. Kliewer, Erich V. Musto, Grace Shu, Emma Biswanger, Natalie Fradette, Katherine Elias, Brenda Griffith, Jane Turner, Donna |
author_facet | Demers, Alain A. Decker, Kathleen M. Kliewer, Erich V. Musto, Grace Shu, Emma Biswanger, Natalie Fradette, Katherine Elias, Brenda Griffith, Jane Turner, Donna |
author_sort | Demers, Alain A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: First Nations (FN) women historically have low rates of preventive care, including breast cancer screening. We describe the frequency of breast cancer screening among FN women living in Manitoba and all other Manitoba (AOM) women after the introduction of a provincial, organized breast screening program and explore how age, area of residence, and time period influenced breast cancer screening participation. METHODS: The federal Indian Registry was linked to 2 population-based, provincial data sources. A negative binomial model was used to compare breast cancer screening for FN women with screening for AOM women. RESULTS: From 1999 through 2008, 37% of FN and 59% of AOM women had a mammogram in the previous 2 years. Regardless of area of residence, FN women were less likely to have had a mammogram than AOM women (relative rate [RR] = 0.69 in the north, RR = 0.55 in the rural south, and RR = 0.53 in urban areas). CONCLUSIONS: FN women living in Manitoba had lower mammography rates than AOM women. To ensure equity for all Manitoba women, strategies that encourage FN women to participate in breast cancer screening should be promoted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4454407 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44544072015-06-12 Mammography Rates for Breast Cancer Screening: A Comparison of First Nations Women and All Other Women Living in Manitoba, Canada, 1999–2008 Demers, Alain A. Decker, Kathleen M. Kliewer, Erich V. Musto, Grace Shu, Emma Biswanger, Natalie Fradette, Katherine Elias, Brenda Griffith, Jane Turner, Donna Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: First Nations (FN) women historically have low rates of preventive care, including breast cancer screening. We describe the frequency of breast cancer screening among FN women living in Manitoba and all other Manitoba (AOM) women after the introduction of a provincial, organized breast screening program and explore how age, area of residence, and time period influenced breast cancer screening participation. METHODS: The federal Indian Registry was linked to 2 population-based, provincial data sources. A negative binomial model was used to compare breast cancer screening for FN women with screening for AOM women. RESULTS: From 1999 through 2008, 37% of FN and 59% of AOM women had a mammogram in the previous 2 years. Regardless of area of residence, FN women were less likely to have had a mammogram than AOM women (relative rate [RR] = 0.69 in the north, RR = 0.55 in the rural south, and RR = 0.53 in urban areas). CONCLUSIONS: FN women living in Manitoba had lower mammography rates than AOM women. To ensure equity for all Manitoba women, strategies that encourage FN women to participate in breast cancer screening should be promoted. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2015-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4454407/ /pubmed/26020546 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd12.140571 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Demers, Alain A. Decker, Kathleen M. Kliewer, Erich V. Musto, Grace Shu, Emma Biswanger, Natalie Fradette, Katherine Elias, Brenda Griffith, Jane Turner, Donna Mammography Rates for Breast Cancer Screening: A Comparison of First Nations Women and All Other Women Living in Manitoba, Canada, 1999–2008 |
title | Mammography Rates for Breast Cancer Screening: A Comparison of First Nations Women and All Other Women Living in Manitoba, Canada, 1999–2008 |
title_full | Mammography Rates for Breast Cancer Screening: A Comparison of First Nations Women and All Other Women Living in Manitoba, Canada, 1999–2008 |
title_fullStr | Mammography Rates for Breast Cancer Screening: A Comparison of First Nations Women and All Other Women Living in Manitoba, Canada, 1999–2008 |
title_full_unstemmed | Mammography Rates for Breast Cancer Screening: A Comparison of First Nations Women and All Other Women Living in Manitoba, Canada, 1999–2008 |
title_short | Mammography Rates for Breast Cancer Screening: A Comparison of First Nations Women and All Other Women Living in Manitoba, Canada, 1999–2008 |
title_sort | mammography rates for breast cancer screening: a comparison of first nations women and all other women living in manitoba, canada, 1999–2008 |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4454407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26020546 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd12.140571 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demersalaina mammographyratesforbreastcancerscreeningacomparisonoffirstnationswomenandallotherwomenlivinginmanitobacanada19992008 AT deckerkathleenm mammographyratesforbreastcancerscreeningacomparisonoffirstnationswomenandallotherwomenlivinginmanitobacanada19992008 AT kliewererichv mammographyratesforbreastcancerscreeningacomparisonoffirstnationswomenandallotherwomenlivinginmanitobacanada19992008 AT mustograce mammographyratesforbreastcancerscreeningacomparisonoffirstnationswomenandallotherwomenlivinginmanitobacanada19992008 AT shuemma mammographyratesforbreastcancerscreeningacomparisonoffirstnationswomenandallotherwomenlivinginmanitobacanada19992008 AT biswangernatalie mammographyratesforbreastcancerscreeningacomparisonoffirstnationswomenandallotherwomenlivinginmanitobacanada19992008 AT fradettekatherine mammographyratesforbreastcancerscreeningacomparisonoffirstnationswomenandallotherwomenlivinginmanitobacanada19992008 AT eliasbrenda mammographyratesforbreastcancerscreeningacomparisonoffirstnationswomenandallotherwomenlivinginmanitobacanada19992008 AT griffithjane mammographyratesforbreastcancerscreeningacomparisonoffirstnationswomenandallotherwomenlivinginmanitobacanada19992008 AT turnerdonna mammographyratesforbreastcancerscreeningacomparisonoffirstnationswomenandallotherwomenlivinginmanitobacanada19992008 |