Cargando…
Interoception and symptom reporting: disentangling accuracy and bias
Anxiety and anxiety sensitivity are positively related to accuracy in the perception of bodily sensations. At the same time, research consistently reports that these traits are positively related to bias, resulting in the report of more and more intense symptoms that poorly correspond with physiolog...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4454884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26089810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00732 |
_version_ | 1782374665176481792 |
---|---|
author | Petersen, Sibylle Van Staeyen, Ken Vögele, Claus von Leupoldt, Andreas Van den Bergh, Omer |
author_facet | Petersen, Sibylle Van Staeyen, Ken Vögele, Claus von Leupoldt, Andreas Van den Bergh, Omer |
author_sort | Petersen, Sibylle |
collection | PubMed |
description | Anxiety and anxiety sensitivity are positively related to accuracy in the perception of bodily sensations. At the same time, research consistently reports that these traits are positively related to bias, resulting in the report of more and more intense symptoms that poorly correspond with physiological dysfunction. The aim of this study was to test the relationship of accuracy and bias in interoception. Furthermore, we tested the impact of individual differences in negative affect and symptom report in daily life on interoceptive accuracy and bias. Individuals higher in symptom report in daily life and negative affect were marginally more accurate in an interoceptive classification task in which participants were asked to identify different respiratory stimuli (inducing breathing effort) as belonging to a high or low intensity category. At the same time, bias in overestimating intensity of stimuli was significantly increased in participants higher in symptom report and negative affect, but only for more ambiguous stimuli. Results illustrate that interoceptive accuracy and bias need to be considered independently to understand their interaction with psychological factors and to disentangle (mis)perception of bodily sensations from liberal or conservative perceptual decision strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4454884 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44548842015-06-18 Interoception and symptom reporting: disentangling accuracy and bias Petersen, Sibylle Van Staeyen, Ken Vögele, Claus von Leupoldt, Andreas Van den Bergh, Omer Front Psychol Psychology Anxiety and anxiety sensitivity are positively related to accuracy in the perception of bodily sensations. At the same time, research consistently reports that these traits are positively related to bias, resulting in the report of more and more intense symptoms that poorly correspond with physiological dysfunction. The aim of this study was to test the relationship of accuracy and bias in interoception. Furthermore, we tested the impact of individual differences in negative affect and symptom report in daily life on interoceptive accuracy and bias. Individuals higher in symptom report in daily life and negative affect were marginally more accurate in an interoceptive classification task in which participants were asked to identify different respiratory stimuli (inducing breathing effort) as belonging to a high or low intensity category. At the same time, bias in overestimating intensity of stimuli was significantly increased in participants higher in symptom report and negative affect, but only for more ambiguous stimuli. Results illustrate that interoceptive accuracy and bias need to be considered independently to understand their interaction with psychological factors and to disentangle (mis)perception of bodily sensations from liberal or conservative perceptual decision strategies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4454884/ /pubmed/26089810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00732 Text en Copyright © 2015 Petersen, Van Staeyen, Vögele, von Leupoldt and Van den Bergh. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Petersen, Sibylle Van Staeyen, Ken Vögele, Claus von Leupoldt, Andreas Van den Bergh, Omer Interoception and symptom reporting: disentangling accuracy and bias |
title | Interoception and symptom reporting: disentangling accuracy and bias |
title_full | Interoception and symptom reporting: disentangling accuracy and bias |
title_fullStr | Interoception and symptom reporting: disentangling accuracy and bias |
title_full_unstemmed | Interoception and symptom reporting: disentangling accuracy and bias |
title_short | Interoception and symptom reporting: disentangling accuracy and bias |
title_sort | interoception and symptom reporting: disentangling accuracy and bias |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4454884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26089810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00732 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petersensibylle interoceptionandsymptomreportingdisentanglingaccuracyandbias AT vanstaeyenken interoceptionandsymptomreportingdisentanglingaccuracyandbias AT vogeleclaus interoceptionandsymptomreportingdisentanglingaccuracyandbias AT vonleupoldtandreas interoceptionandsymptomreportingdisentanglingaccuracyandbias AT vandenberghomer interoceptionandsymptomreportingdisentanglingaccuracyandbias |