Cargando…

Interoception and symptom reporting: disentangling accuracy and bias

Anxiety and anxiety sensitivity are positively related to accuracy in the perception of bodily sensations. At the same time, research consistently reports that these traits are positively related to bias, resulting in the report of more and more intense symptoms that poorly correspond with physiolog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petersen, Sibylle, Van Staeyen, Ken, Vögele, Claus, von Leupoldt, Andreas, Van den Bergh, Omer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4454884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26089810
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00732
_version_ 1782374665176481792
author Petersen, Sibylle
Van Staeyen, Ken
Vögele, Claus
von Leupoldt, Andreas
Van den Bergh, Omer
author_facet Petersen, Sibylle
Van Staeyen, Ken
Vögele, Claus
von Leupoldt, Andreas
Van den Bergh, Omer
author_sort Petersen, Sibylle
collection PubMed
description Anxiety and anxiety sensitivity are positively related to accuracy in the perception of bodily sensations. At the same time, research consistently reports that these traits are positively related to bias, resulting in the report of more and more intense symptoms that poorly correspond with physiological dysfunction. The aim of this study was to test the relationship of accuracy and bias in interoception. Furthermore, we tested the impact of individual differences in negative affect and symptom report in daily life on interoceptive accuracy and bias. Individuals higher in symptom report in daily life and negative affect were marginally more accurate in an interoceptive classification task in which participants were asked to identify different respiratory stimuli (inducing breathing effort) as belonging to a high or low intensity category. At the same time, bias in overestimating intensity of stimuli was significantly increased in participants higher in symptom report and negative affect, but only for more ambiguous stimuli. Results illustrate that interoceptive accuracy and bias need to be considered independently to understand their interaction with psychological factors and to disentangle (mis)perception of bodily sensations from liberal or conservative perceptual decision strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4454884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44548842015-06-18 Interoception and symptom reporting: disentangling accuracy and bias Petersen, Sibylle Van Staeyen, Ken Vögele, Claus von Leupoldt, Andreas Van den Bergh, Omer Front Psychol Psychology Anxiety and anxiety sensitivity are positively related to accuracy in the perception of bodily sensations. At the same time, research consistently reports that these traits are positively related to bias, resulting in the report of more and more intense symptoms that poorly correspond with physiological dysfunction. The aim of this study was to test the relationship of accuracy and bias in interoception. Furthermore, we tested the impact of individual differences in negative affect and symptom report in daily life on interoceptive accuracy and bias. Individuals higher in symptom report in daily life and negative affect were marginally more accurate in an interoceptive classification task in which participants were asked to identify different respiratory stimuli (inducing breathing effort) as belonging to a high or low intensity category. At the same time, bias in overestimating intensity of stimuli was significantly increased in participants higher in symptom report and negative affect, but only for more ambiguous stimuli. Results illustrate that interoceptive accuracy and bias need to be considered independently to understand their interaction with psychological factors and to disentangle (mis)perception of bodily sensations from liberal or conservative perceptual decision strategies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4454884/ /pubmed/26089810 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00732 Text en Copyright © 2015 Petersen, Van Staeyen, Vögele, von Leupoldt and Van den Bergh. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Petersen, Sibylle
Van Staeyen, Ken
Vögele, Claus
von Leupoldt, Andreas
Van den Bergh, Omer
Interoception and symptom reporting: disentangling accuracy and bias
title Interoception and symptom reporting: disentangling accuracy and bias
title_full Interoception and symptom reporting: disentangling accuracy and bias
title_fullStr Interoception and symptom reporting: disentangling accuracy and bias
title_full_unstemmed Interoception and symptom reporting: disentangling accuracy and bias
title_short Interoception and symptom reporting: disentangling accuracy and bias
title_sort interoception and symptom reporting: disentangling accuracy and bias
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4454884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26089810
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00732
work_keys_str_mv AT petersensibylle interoceptionandsymptomreportingdisentanglingaccuracyandbias
AT vanstaeyenken interoceptionandsymptomreportingdisentanglingaccuracyandbias
AT vogeleclaus interoceptionandsymptomreportingdisentanglingaccuracyandbias
AT vonleupoldtandreas interoceptionandsymptomreportingdisentanglingaccuracyandbias
AT vandenberghomer interoceptionandsymptomreportingdisentanglingaccuracyandbias