Cargando…

Strategies for expanding health insurance coverage in vulnerable populations

BACKGROUND: Health insurance has the potential to improve access to health care and protect people from the financial risks of diseases. However, health insurance coverage is often low, particularly for people most in need of protection, including children and other vulnerable populations. OBJECTIVE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jia, Liying, Yuan, Beibei, Huang, Fei, Lu, Ying, Garner, Paul, Meng, Qingyue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2014
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4455226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25425010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008194.pub3
_version_ 1782374727343407104
author Jia, Liying
Yuan, Beibei
Huang, Fei
Lu, Ying
Garner, Paul
Meng, Qingyue
author_facet Jia, Liying
Yuan, Beibei
Huang, Fei
Lu, Ying
Garner, Paul
Meng, Qingyue
author_sort Jia, Liying
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health insurance has the potential to improve access to health care and protect people from the financial risks of diseases. However, health insurance coverage is often low, particularly for people most in need of protection, including children and other vulnerable populations. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of strategies for expanding health insurance coverage in vulnerable populations. SEARCH METHODS: We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), part of The Cochrane Library. www.thecochranelibrary.com (searched 2 November 2012), PubMed (searched 1 November 2012), EMBASE (searched 6 July 2012), Global Health (searched 6 July 2012), IBSS (searched 6 July 2012), WHO Library Database (WHOLIS) (searched 1 November 2012), IDEAS (searched 1 November 2012), ISI‐Proceedings (searched 1 November 2012),OpenGrey (changed from OpenSIGLE) (searched 1 November 2012), African Index Medicus (searched 1 November 2012), BLDS (searched 1 November 2012), Econlit (searched 1 November 2012), ELDIS (searched 1 November 2012), ERIC (searched 1 November 2012), HERDIN NeON Database (searched 1 November 2012), IndMED (searched 1 November 2012), JSTOR (searched 1 November 2012), LILACS(searched 1 November 2012), NTIS (searched 1 November 2012), PAIS (searched 6 July 2012), Popline (searched 1 November 2012), ProQuest Dissertation &Theses Database (searched 1 November 2012), PsycINFO (searched 6 July 2012), SSRN (searched 1 November 2012), Thai Index Medicus (searched 1 November 2012), World Bank (searched 2 November 2012), WanFang (searched 3 November 2012), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CHKD‐CNKI) (searched 2 November 2012). In addition, we searched the reference lists of included studies and carried out a citation search for the included studies via Web of Science to find other potentially relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non‐randomised controlled trials (NRCTs), controlled before‐after (CBA) studies and Interrupted time series (ITS) studies that evaluated the effects of strategies on increasing health insurance coverage for vulnerable populations. We defined strategies as measures to improve the enrolment of vulnerable populations into health insurance schemes. Two categories and six specified strategies were identified as the interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. We undertook a structured synthesis. MAIN RESULTS: We included two studies, both from the United States. People offered health insurance information and application support by community‐based case managers were probably more likely to enrol their children into health insurance programmes (risk ratio (RR) 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.44 to 1.96, moderate quality evidence) and were probably more likely to continue insuring their children (RR 2.59, 95% CI 1.95 to 3.44, moderate quality evidence). Of all the children that were insured, those in the intervention group may have been insured quicker (47.3 fewer days, 95% CI 20.6 to 74.0 fewer days, low quality evidence) and parents may have been more satisfied on average (satisfaction score average difference 1.07, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.42, low quality evidence). In the second study applications were handed out in emergency departments at hospitals, compared to not handing out applications, and may have had an effect on enrolment (RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.18, low quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Community‐based case managers who provide health insurance information, application support, and negotiate with the insurer probably increase enrolment of children in health insurance schemes. However, the transferability of this intervention to other populations or other settings is uncertain. Handing out insurance application materials in hospital emergency departments may help increase the enrolment of children in health insurance schemes. Further studies evaluating the effectiveness of different strategies for expanding health insurance coverage in vulnerable population are needed in different settings, with careful attention given to study design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4455226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44552262015-06-10 Strategies for expanding health insurance coverage in vulnerable populations Jia, Liying Yuan, Beibei Huang, Fei Lu, Ying Garner, Paul Meng, Qingyue Cochrane Database Syst Rev BACKGROUND: Health insurance has the potential to improve access to health care and protect people from the financial risks of diseases. However, health insurance coverage is often low, particularly for people most in need of protection, including children and other vulnerable populations. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of strategies for expanding health insurance coverage in vulnerable populations. SEARCH METHODS: We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), part of The Cochrane Library. www.thecochranelibrary.com (searched 2 November 2012), PubMed (searched 1 November 2012), EMBASE (searched 6 July 2012), Global Health (searched 6 July 2012), IBSS (searched 6 July 2012), WHO Library Database (WHOLIS) (searched 1 November 2012), IDEAS (searched 1 November 2012), ISI‐Proceedings (searched 1 November 2012),OpenGrey (changed from OpenSIGLE) (searched 1 November 2012), African Index Medicus (searched 1 November 2012), BLDS (searched 1 November 2012), Econlit (searched 1 November 2012), ELDIS (searched 1 November 2012), ERIC (searched 1 November 2012), HERDIN NeON Database (searched 1 November 2012), IndMED (searched 1 November 2012), JSTOR (searched 1 November 2012), LILACS(searched 1 November 2012), NTIS (searched 1 November 2012), PAIS (searched 6 July 2012), Popline (searched 1 November 2012), ProQuest Dissertation &Theses Database (searched 1 November 2012), PsycINFO (searched 6 July 2012), SSRN (searched 1 November 2012), Thai Index Medicus (searched 1 November 2012), World Bank (searched 2 November 2012), WanFang (searched 3 November 2012), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CHKD‐CNKI) (searched 2 November 2012). In addition, we searched the reference lists of included studies and carried out a citation search for the included studies via Web of Science to find other potentially relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non‐randomised controlled trials (NRCTs), controlled before‐after (CBA) studies and Interrupted time series (ITS) studies that evaluated the effects of strategies on increasing health insurance coverage for vulnerable populations. We defined strategies as measures to improve the enrolment of vulnerable populations into health insurance schemes. Two categories and six specified strategies were identified as the interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. We undertook a structured synthesis. MAIN RESULTS: We included two studies, both from the United States. People offered health insurance information and application support by community‐based case managers were probably more likely to enrol their children into health insurance programmes (risk ratio (RR) 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.44 to 1.96, moderate quality evidence) and were probably more likely to continue insuring their children (RR 2.59, 95% CI 1.95 to 3.44, moderate quality evidence). Of all the children that were insured, those in the intervention group may have been insured quicker (47.3 fewer days, 95% CI 20.6 to 74.0 fewer days, low quality evidence) and parents may have been more satisfied on average (satisfaction score average difference 1.07, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.42, low quality evidence). In the second study applications were handed out in emergency departments at hospitals, compared to not handing out applications, and may have had an effect on enrolment (RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.18, low quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Community‐based case managers who provide health insurance information, application support, and negotiate with the insurer probably increase enrolment of children in health insurance schemes. However, the transferability of this intervention to other populations or other settings is uncertain. Handing out insurance application materials in hospital emergency departments may help increase the enrolment of children in health insurance schemes. Further studies evaluating the effectiveness of different strategies for expanding health insurance coverage in vulnerable population are needed in different settings, with careful attention given to study design. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2014-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4455226/ /pubmed/25425010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008194.pub3 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐Non‐Commercial (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) Licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Jia, Liying
Yuan, Beibei
Huang, Fei
Lu, Ying
Garner, Paul
Meng, Qingyue
Strategies for expanding health insurance coverage in vulnerable populations
title Strategies for expanding health insurance coverage in vulnerable populations
title_full Strategies for expanding health insurance coverage in vulnerable populations
title_fullStr Strategies for expanding health insurance coverage in vulnerable populations
title_full_unstemmed Strategies for expanding health insurance coverage in vulnerable populations
title_short Strategies for expanding health insurance coverage in vulnerable populations
title_sort strategies for expanding health insurance coverage in vulnerable populations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4455226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25425010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008194.pub3
work_keys_str_mv AT jialiying strategiesforexpandinghealthinsurancecoverageinvulnerablepopulations
AT yuanbeibei strategiesforexpandinghealthinsurancecoverageinvulnerablepopulations
AT huangfei strategiesforexpandinghealthinsurancecoverageinvulnerablepopulations
AT luying strategiesforexpandinghealthinsurancecoverageinvulnerablepopulations
AT garnerpaul strategiesforexpandinghealthinsurancecoverageinvulnerablepopulations
AT mengqingyue strategiesforexpandinghealthinsurancecoverageinvulnerablepopulations