Cargando…
A Review of Nonoccupational Pathways for Pesticide Exposure in Women Living in Agricultural Areas
BACKGROUND: Women living in agricultural areas may experience high pesticide exposures compared with women in urban or suburban areas because of their proximity to farm activities. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to review the evidence in the published literature for the contribution of nonoccupational...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
NLM-Export
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4455586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25636067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408273 |
_version_ | 1782374754387230720 |
---|---|
author | Deziel, Nicole C. Friesen, Melissa C. Hoppin, Jane A. Hines, Cynthia J. Thomas, Kent Freeman, Laura E. Beane |
author_facet | Deziel, Nicole C. Friesen, Melissa C. Hoppin, Jane A. Hines, Cynthia J. Thomas, Kent Freeman, Laura E. Beane |
author_sort | Deziel, Nicole C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Women living in agricultural areas may experience high pesticide exposures compared with women in urban or suburban areas because of their proximity to farm activities. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to review the evidence in the published literature for the contribution of nonoccupational pathways of pesticide exposure in women living in North American agricultural areas. METHODS: We evaluated the following nonoccupational exposure pathways: paraoccupational (i.e., take-home or bystander exposure), agricultural drift, residential pesticide use, and dietary ingestion. We also evaluated the role of hygiene factors (e.g., house cleaning, shoe removal). RESULTS: Among 35 publications identified (published 1995–2013), several reported significant or suggestive (p < 0.1) associations between paraoccupational (n = 19) and agricultural drift (n = 10) pathways and pesticide dust or biomarker levels, and 3 observed that residential use was associated with pesticide concentrations in dust. The 4 studies related to ingestion reported low detection rates of most pesticides in water; additional studies are needed to draw conclusions about the importance of this pathway. Hygiene factors were not consistently linked to exposure among the 18 relevant publications identified. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence supported the importance of paraoccupational, drift, and residential use pathways. Disentangling exposure pathways was difficult because agricultural populations are concurrently exposed to pesticides via multiple pathways. Most evidence was based on measurements of pesticides in residential dust, which are applicable to any household member and are not specific to women. An improved understanding of nonoccupational pesticide exposure pathways in women living in agricultural areas is critical for studying health effects in women and for designing effective exposure-reduction strategies. CITATION: Deziel NC, Friesen MC, Hoppin JA, Hines CJ, Thomas K, Beane Freeman LE. 2015. A review of nonoccupational pathways for pesticide exposure in women living in agricultural areas. Environ Health Perspect 123:515–524; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408273 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4455586 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | NLM-Export |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44555862015-06-09 A Review of Nonoccupational Pathways for Pesticide Exposure in Women Living in Agricultural Areas Deziel, Nicole C. Friesen, Melissa C. Hoppin, Jane A. Hines, Cynthia J. Thomas, Kent Freeman, Laura E. Beane Environ Health Perspect Review BACKGROUND: Women living in agricultural areas may experience high pesticide exposures compared with women in urban or suburban areas because of their proximity to farm activities. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to review the evidence in the published literature for the contribution of nonoccupational pathways of pesticide exposure in women living in North American agricultural areas. METHODS: We evaluated the following nonoccupational exposure pathways: paraoccupational (i.e., take-home or bystander exposure), agricultural drift, residential pesticide use, and dietary ingestion. We also evaluated the role of hygiene factors (e.g., house cleaning, shoe removal). RESULTS: Among 35 publications identified (published 1995–2013), several reported significant or suggestive (p < 0.1) associations between paraoccupational (n = 19) and agricultural drift (n = 10) pathways and pesticide dust or biomarker levels, and 3 observed that residential use was associated with pesticide concentrations in dust. The 4 studies related to ingestion reported low detection rates of most pesticides in water; additional studies are needed to draw conclusions about the importance of this pathway. Hygiene factors were not consistently linked to exposure among the 18 relevant publications identified. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence supported the importance of paraoccupational, drift, and residential use pathways. Disentangling exposure pathways was difficult because agricultural populations are concurrently exposed to pesticides via multiple pathways. Most evidence was based on measurements of pesticides in residential dust, which are applicable to any household member and are not specific to women. An improved understanding of nonoccupational pesticide exposure pathways in women living in agricultural areas is critical for studying health effects in women and for designing effective exposure-reduction strategies. CITATION: Deziel NC, Friesen MC, Hoppin JA, Hines CJ, Thomas K, Beane Freeman LE. 2015. A review of nonoccupational pathways for pesticide exposure in women living in agricultural areas. Environ Health Perspect 123:515–524; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408273 NLM-Export 2015-01-30 2015-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4455586/ /pubmed/25636067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408273 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, “Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives”); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright. |
spellingShingle | Review Deziel, Nicole C. Friesen, Melissa C. Hoppin, Jane A. Hines, Cynthia J. Thomas, Kent Freeman, Laura E. Beane A Review of Nonoccupational Pathways for Pesticide Exposure in Women Living in Agricultural Areas |
title | A Review of Nonoccupational Pathways for Pesticide Exposure in Women Living in Agricultural Areas |
title_full | A Review of Nonoccupational Pathways for Pesticide Exposure in Women Living in Agricultural Areas |
title_fullStr | A Review of Nonoccupational Pathways for Pesticide Exposure in Women Living in Agricultural Areas |
title_full_unstemmed | A Review of Nonoccupational Pathways for Pesticide Exposure in Women Living in Agricultural Areas |
title_short | A Review of Nonoccupational Pathways for Pesticide Exposure in Women Living in Agricultural Areas |
title_sort | review of nonoccupational pathways for pesticide exposure in women living in agricultural areas |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4455586/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25636067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408273 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dezielnicolec areviewofnonoccupationalpathwaysforpesticideexposureinwomenlivinginagriculturalareas AT friesenmelissac areviewofnonoccupationalpathwaysforpesticideexposureinwomenlivinginagriculturalareas AT hoppinjanea areviewofnonoccupationalpathwaysforpesticideexposureinwomenlivinginagriculturalareas AT hinescynthiaj areviewofnonoccupationalpathwaysforpesticideexposureinwomenlivinginagriculturalareas AT thomaskent areviewofnonoccupationalpathwaysforpesticideexposureinwomenlivinginagriculturalareas AT freemanlauraebeane areviewofnonoccupationalpathwaysforpesticideexposureinwomenlivinginagriculturalareas AT dezielnicolec reviewofnonoccupationalpathwaysforpesticideexposureinwomenlivinginagriculturalareas AT friesenmelissac reviewofnonoccupationalpathwaysforpesticideexposureinwomenlivinginagriculturalareas AT hoppinjanea reviewofnonoccupationalpathwaysforpesticideexposureinwomenlivinginagriculturalareas AT hinescynthiaj reviewofnonoccupationalpathwaysforpesticideexposureinwomenlivinginagriculturalareas AT thomaskent reviewofnonoccupationalpathwaysforpesticideexposureinwomenlivinginagriculturalareas AT freemanlauraebeane reviewofnonoccupationalpathwaysforpesticideexposureinwomenlivinginagriculturalareas |