Cargando…

A Review of Nonoccupational Pathways for Pesticide Exposure in Women Living in Agricultural Areas

BACKGROUND: Women living in agricultural areas may experience high pesticide exposures compared with women in urban or suburban areas because of their proximity to farm activities. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to review the evidence in the published literature for the contribution of nonoccupational...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deziel, Nicole C., Friesen, Melissa C., Hoppin, Jane A., Hines, Cynthia J., Thomas, Kent, Freeman, Laura E. Beane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: NLM-Export 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4455586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25636067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408273
_version_ 1782374754387230720
author Deziel, Nicole C.
Friesen, Melissa C.
Hoppin, Jane A.
Hines, Cynthia J.
Thomas, Kent
Freeman, Laura E. Beane
author_facet Deziel, Nicole C.
Friesen, Melissa C.
Hoppin, Jane A.
Hines, Cynthia J.
Thomas, Kent
Freeman, Laura E. Beane
author_sort Deziel, Nicole C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Women living in agricultural areas may experience high pesticide exposures compared with women in urban or suburban areas because of their proximity to farm activities. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to review the evidence in the published literature for the contribution of nonoccupational pathways of pesticide exposure in women living in North American agricultural areas. METHODS: We evaluated the following nonoccupational exposure pathways: paraoccupational (i.e., take-home or bystander exposure), agricultural drift, residential pesticide use, and dietary ingestion. We also evaluated the role of hygiene factors (e.g., house cleaning, shoe removal). RESULTS: Among 35 publications identified (published 1995–2013), several reported significant or suggestive (p < 0.1) associations between paraoccupational (n = 19) and agricultural drift (n = 10) pathways and pesticide dust or biomarker levels, and 3 observed that residential use was associated with pesticide concentrations in dust. The 4 studies related to ingestion reported low detection rates of most pesticides in water; additional studies are needed to draw conclusions about the importance of this pathway. Hygiene factors were not consistently linked to exposure among the 18 relevant publications identified. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence supported the importance of paraoccupational, drift, and residential use pathways. Disentangling exposure pathways was difficult because agricultural populations are concurrently exposed to pesticides via multiple pathways. Most evidence was based on measurements of pesticides in residential dust, which are applicable to any household member and are not specific to women. An improved understanding of nonoccupational pesticide exposure pathways in women living in agricultural areas is critical for studying health effects in women and for designing effective exposure-reduction strategies. CITATION: Deziel NC, Friesen MC, Hoppin JA, Hines CJ, Thomas K, Beane Freeman LE. 2015. A review of nonoccupational pathways for pesticide exposure in women living in agricultural areas. Environ Health Perspect 123:515–524; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408273
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4455586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher NLM-Export
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44555862015-06-09 A Review of Nonoccupational Pathways for Pesticide Exposure in Women Living in Agricultural Areas Deziel, Nicole C. Friesen, Melissa C. Hoppin, Jane A. Hines, Cynthia J. Thomas, Kent Freeman, Laura E. Beane Environ Health Perspect Review BACKGROUND: Women living in agricultural areas may experience high pesticide exposures compared with women in urban or suburban areas because of their proximity to farm activities. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to review the evidence in the published literature for the contribution of nonoccupational pathways of pesticide exposure in women living in North American agricultural areas. METHODS: We evaluated the following nonoccupational exposure pathways: paraoccupational (i.e., take-home or bystander exposure), agricultural drift, residential pesticide use, and dietary ingestion. We also evaluated the role of hygiene factors (e.g., house cleaning, shoe removal). RESULTS: Among 35 publications identified (published 1995–2013), several reported significant or suggestive (p < 0.1) associations between paraoccupational (n = 19) and agricultural drift (n = 10) pathways and pesticide dust or biomarker levels, and 3 observed that residential use was associated with pesticide concentrations in dust. The 4 studies related to ingestion reported low detection rates of most pesticides in water; additional studies are needed to draw conclusions about the importance of this pathway. Hygiene factors were not consistently linked to exposure among the 18 relevant publications identified. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence supported the importance of paraoccupational, drift, and residential use pathways. Disentangling exposure pathways was difficult because agricultural populations are concurrently exposed to pesticides via multiple pathways. Most evidence was based on measurements of pesticides in residential dust, which are applicable to any household member and are not specific to women. An improved understanding of nonoccupational pesticide exposure pathways in women living in agricultural areas is critical for studying health effects in women and for designing effective exposure-reduction strategies. CITATION: Deziel NC, Friesen MC, Hoppin JA, Hines CJ, Thomas K, Beane Freeman LE. 2015. A review of nonoccupational pathways for pesticide exposure in women living in agricultural areas. Environ Health Perspect 123:515–524; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408273 NLM-Export 2015-01-30 2015-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4455586/ /pubmed/25636067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408273 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, “Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives”); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Review
Deziel, Nicole C.
Friesen, Melissa C.
Hoppin, Jane A.
Hines, Cynthia J.
Thomas, Kent
Freeman, Laura E. Beane
A Review of Nonoccupational Pathways for Pesticide Exposure in Women Living in Agricultural Areas
title A Review of Nonoccupational Pathways for Pesticide Exposure in Women Living in Agricultural Areas
title_full A Review of Nonoccupational Pathways for Pesticide Exposure in Women Living in Agricultural Areas
title_fullStr A Review of Nonoccupational Pathways for Pesticide Exposure in Women Living in Agricultural Areas
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Nonoccupational Pathways for Pesticide Exposure in Women Living in Agricultural Areas
title_short A Review of Nonoccupational Pathways for Pesticide Exposure in Women Living in Agricultural Areas
title_sort review of nonoccupational pathways for pesticide exposure in women living in agricultural areas
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4455586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25636067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408273
work_keys_str_mv AT dezielnicolec areviewofnonoccupationalpathwaysforpesticideexposureinwomenlivinginagriculturalareas
AT friesenmelissac areviewofnonoccupationalpathwaysforpesticideexposureinwomenlivinginagriculturalareas
AT hoppinjanea areviewofnonoccupationalpathwaysforpesticideexposureinwomenlivinginagriculturalareas
AT hinescynthiaj areviewofnonoccupationalpathwaysforpesticideexposureinwomenlivinginagriculturalareas
AT thomaskent areviewofnonoccupationalpathwaysforpesticideexposureinwomenlivinginagriculturalareas
AT freemanlauraebeane areviewofnonoccupationalpathwaysforpesticideexposureinwomenlivinginagriculturalareas
AT dezielnicolec reviewofnonoccupationalpathwaysforpesticideexposureinwomenlivinginagriculturalareas
AT friesenmelissac reviewofnonoccupationalpathwaysforpesticideexposureinwomenlivinginagriculturalareas
AT hoppinjanea reviewofnonoccupationalpathwaysforpesticideexposureinwomenlivinginagriculturalareas
AT hinescynthiaj reviewofnonoccupationalpathwaysforpesticideexposureinwomenlivinginagriculturalareas
AT thomaskent reviewofnonoccupationalpathwaysforpesticideexposureinwomenlivinginagriculturalareas
AT freemanlauraebeane reviewofnonoccupationalpathwaysforpesticideexposureinwomenlivinginagriculturalareas