Cargando…

Feedback on role model behaviour: effective for clinical trainers?

AIM: The aim of this study was to assess changes in role model behaviour of clinical trainers after giving personal feedback. METHODS: First-year general practitioner (GP) trainees at two institutes for GP speciality training in the Netherlands were asked to complete an assessment of their clinical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jochemsen-van der Leeuw, H.G.A. Ria, Wieringa-de Waard, Margreet, van Dijk, Nynke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25962967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0184-x
_version_ 1782374843664039936
author Jochemsen-van der Leeuw, H.G.A. Ria
Wieringa-de Waard, Margreet
van Dijk, Nynke
author_facet Jochemsen-van der Leeuw, H.G.A. Ria
Wieringa-de Waard, Margreet
van Dijk, Nynke
author_sort Jochemsen-van der Leeuw, H.G.A. Ria
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study was to assess changes in role model behaviour of clinical trainers after giving personal feedback. METHODS: First-year general practitioner (GP) trainees at two institutes for GP speciality training in the Netherlands were asked to complete an assessment of their clinical trainers: the Role Model Apperception Tool (RoMAT). The RoMAT consists of attributes of positive role modelling divided into two components (Caring Attitude and Effectiveness) and was scored on a 5-point Likert scale twice. After the first assessment moment, the trainers received their personal scores combined with the mean score of their peers. The trainers were divided into three performance groups: below average, average and above average. RESULTS: Only the group with the lowest scores showed an improvement on the Effectiveness component of the RoMAT from 3.89 to 4.08 (p = 0.04) with an effect size of.52, showing a large effect. This pattern is confirmed by the number of trainers shifting from the below average performance group to the average (7) and above average (5) performance groups. CONCLUSION: Giving feedback to clinical trainers resulted in better scores on the Effectiveness characteristics. This indicates that role model behaviour of clinical trainers can be improved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4456457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44564572015-06-05 Feedback on role model behaviour: effective for clinical trainers? Jochemsen-van der Leeuw, H.G.A. Ria Wieringa-de Waard, Margreet van Dijk, Nynke Perspect Med Educ Short Communication AIM: The aim of this study was to assess changes in role model behaviour of clinical trainers after giving personal feedback. METHODS: First-year general practitioner (GP) trainees at two institutes for GP speciality training in the Netherlands were asked to complete an assessment of their clinical trainers: the Role Model Apperception Tool (RoMAT). The RoMAT consists of attributes of positive role modelling divided into two components (Caring Attitude and Effectiveness) and was scored on a 5-point Likert scale twice. After the first assessment moment, the trainers received their personal scores combined with the mean score of their peers. The trainers were divided into three performance groups: below average, average and above average. RESULTS: Only the group with the lowest scores showed an improvement on the Effectiveness component of the RoMAT from 3.89 to 4.08 (p = 0.04) with an effect size of.52, showing a large effect. This pattern is confirmed by the number of trainers shifting from the below average performance group to the average (7) and above average (5) performance groups. CONCLUSION: Giving feedback to clinical trainers resulted in better scores on the Effectiveness characteristics. This indicates that role model behaviour of clinical trainers can be improved. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2015-05-12 2015-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4456457/ /pubmed/25962967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0184-x Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Jochemsen-van der Leeuw, H.G.A. Ria
Wieringa-de Waard, Margreet
van Dijk, Nynke
Feedback on role model behaviour: effective for clinical trainers?
title Feedback on role model behaviour: effective for clinical trainers?
title_full Feedback on role model behaviour: effective for clinical trainers?
title_fullStr Feedback on role model behaviour: effective for clinical trainers?
title_full_unstemmed Feedback on role model behaviour: effective for clinical trainers?
title_short Feedback on role model behaviour: effective for clinical trainers?
title_sort feedback on role model behaviour: effective for clinical trainers?
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25962967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0184-x
work_keys_str_mv AT jochemsenvanderleeuwhgaria feedbackonrolemodelbehavioureffectiveforclinicaltrainers
AT wieringadewaardmargreet feedbackonrolemodelbehavioureffectiveforclinicaltrainers
AT vandijknynke feedbackonrolemodelbehavioureffectiveforclinicaltrainers