Cargando…

Development of a standardized testing system for orthodontic sliding mechanics

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to develop a computer-controlled three-dimensional friction measuring system, the orthodontic friction simulator (OFS). A clinically-based in vitro experiment considering wet and dry friction for conventionally and self-ligated brackets is presente...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fathimani, Maryam, Melenka, Garrett W, Romanyk, Dan L, Toogood, Roger W, Heo, Giseon, Carey, Jason P, Major, Paul W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26061991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-015-0087-8
_version_ 1782374853562597376
author Fathimani, Maryam
Melenka, Garrett W
Romanyk, Dan L
Toogood, Roger W
Heo, Giseon
Carey, Jason P
Major, Paul W
author_facet Fathimani, Maryam
Melenka, Garrett W
Romanyk, Dan L
Toogood, Roger W
Heo, Giseon
Carey, Jason P
Major, Paul W
author_sort Fathimani, Maryam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to develop a computer-controlled three-dimensional friction measuring system, the orthodontic friction simulator (OFS). A clinically-based in vitro experiment considering wet and dry friction for conventionally and self-ligated brackets is presented to elucidate debate surrounding sliding mechanics and illustrate capabilities of the OFS. METHODS: The OFS was designed and manufactured using sound engineering principles and with the primary concern of being able to measure all forces and moments generated during sliding mechanics. This required the implementation of a six-axis load cell. A variety of translation and rotation stages were also incorporated to allow for precise positioning of the bracket relative to the archwire. Once designed and built, the OFS was then used to compare conventional and self-ligation methods in both the wet and dry state. Damon Q brackets and 0.018″ × 0.025″ stainless steel wires were used for all tests with a sample size of n = 65 for each ligation method. Archwires were pulled at a speed of 0.1 mm/s in 11 increments of 0.1 mm. At each increment, the bracket would be rotated 0.5° resulting in a total archwire travel of 1.1 mm and a second-order bracket angle range of 0°–5°. A repeated measures ANOVA was conducted to determine if ligation method and/or addition of moisture effected resulting orthodontic loads. RESULTS: The developed equipment for studying orthodontic sliding mechanics was able to measure forces and moments in all three directions; a capability not previously realized in the literature. Additionally, it was found that passive ligation significantly reduced resistance to sliding, P ≤ 0.05, while the dry/wet state did not. CONCLUSIONS: The OFS certainly proved to be an adequate instrument for the scientific evaluation of orthodontic sliding mechanics. It is capable of measuring loads generated in all directions and is a fully automated apparatus allowing for simple and repeatable friction tests to be conducted. Furthermore, the addition of saliva was not found to significantly influence the loads generated during sliding mechanics regardless of ligation method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4456589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44565892015-06-06 Development of a standardized testing system for orthodontic sliding mechanics Fathimani, Maryam Melenka, Garrett W Romanyk, Dan L Toogood, Roger W Heo, Giseon Carey, Jason P Major, Paul W Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to develop a computer-controlled three-dimensional friction measuring system, the orthodontic friction simulator (OFS). A clinically-based in vitro experiment considering wet and dry friction for conventionally and self-ligated brackets is presented to elucidate debate surrounding sliding mechanics and illustrate capabilities of the OFS. METHODS: The OFS was designed and manufactured using sound engineering principles and with the primary concern of being able to measure all forces and moments generated during sliding mechanics. This required the implementation of a six-axis load cell. A variety of translation and rotation stages were also incorporated to allow for precise positioning of the bracket relative to the archwire. Once designed and built, the OFS was then used to compare conventional and self-ligation methods in both the wet and dry state. Damon Q brackets and 0.018″ × 0.025″ stainless steel wires were used for all tests with a sample size of n = 65 for each ligation method. Archwires were pulled at a speed of 0.1 mm/s in 11 increments of 0.1 mm. At each increment, the bracket would be rotated 0.5° resulting in a total archwire travel of 1.1 mm and a second-order bracket angle range of 0°–5°. A repeated measures ANOVA was conducted to determine if ligation method and/or addition of moisture effected resulting orthodontic loads. RESULTS: The developed equipment for studying orthodontic sliding mechanics was able to measure forces and moments in all three directions; a capability not previously realized in the literature. Additionally, it was found that passive ligation significantly reduced resistance to sliding, P ≤ 0.05, while the dry/wet state did not. CONCLUSIONS: The OFS certainly proved to be an adequate instrument for the scientific evaluation of orthodontic sliding mechanics. It is capable of measuring loads generated in all directions and is a fully automated apparatus allowing for simple and repeatable friction tests to be conducted. Furthermore, the addition of saliva was not found to significantly influence the loads generated during sliding mechanics regardless of ligation method. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4456589/ /pubmed/26061991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-015-0087-8 Text en © Fathimani et al.; licensee Springer. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research
Fathimani, Maryam
Melenka, Garrett W
Romanyk, Dan L
Toogood, Roger W
Heo, Giseon
Carey, Jason P
Major, Paul W
Development of a standardized testing system for orthodontic sliding mechanics
title Development of a standardized testing system for orthodontic sliding mechanics
title_full Development of a standardized testing system for orthodontic sliding mechanics
title_fullStr Development of a standardized testing system for orthodontic sliding mechanics
title_full_unstemmed Development of a standardized testing system for orthodontic sliding mechanics
title_short Development of a standardized testing system for orthodontic sliding mechanics
title_sort development of a standardized testing system for orthodontic sliding mechanics
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26061991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-015-0087-8
work_keys_str_mv AT fathimanimaryam developmentofastandardizedtestingsystemfororthodonticslidingmechanics
AT melenkagarrettw developmentofastandardizedtestingsystemfororthodonticslidingmechanics
AT romanykdanl developmentofastandardizedtestingsystemfororthodonticslidingmechanics
AT toogoodrogerw developmentofastandardizedtestingsystemfororthodonticslidingmechanics
AT heogiseon developmentofastandardizedtestingsystemfororthodonticslidingmechanics
AT careyjasonp developmentofastandardizedtestingsystemfororthodonticslidingmechanics
AT majorpaulw developmentofastandardizedtestingsystemfororthodonticslidingmechanics