Cargando…
Clinical impact of stress dose steroids in patients with septic shock: insights from the PROWESS-Shock trial
INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical impact of the administration of intravenous steroids, alone or in conjunction with drotrecogin-alfa (activated) (DrotAA), on the outcomes in septic shock patients. METHODS: We performed a sub-study of the PROWESS-Shock trial (septic sho...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-0921-x |
_version_ | 1782374868542554112 |
---|---|
author | Póvoa, Pedro Salluh, Jorge I F Martinez, Maria L Guillamat-Prats, Raquel Gallup, Dianne Al-Khalidi, Hussein R Thompson, B Taylor Ranieri, V Marco Artigas, Antonio |
author_facet | Póvoa, Pedro Salluh, Jorge I F Martinez, Maria L Guillamat-Prats, Raquel Gallup, Dianne Al-Khalidi, Hussein R Thompson, B Taylor Ranieri, V Marco Artigas, Antonio |
author_sort | Póvoa, Pedro |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical impact of the administration of intravenous steroids, alone or in conjunction with drotrecogin-alfa (activated) (DrotAA), on the outcomes in septic shock patients. METHODS: We performed a sub-study of the PROWESS-Shock trial (septic shock patients who received fluids and vasopressors above a predefined threshold for at least 4 hours were randomized to receive either DrotAA or placebo for 96 hours). A propensity score for the administration of intravenous steroids for septic shock at baseline was constructed using multivariable logistic regression. Cox proportional hazards model using inverse probability of treatment weighting of the propensity score was used to estimate the effect of intravenous steroids, alone or in conjunction with DrotAA, on 28-day and 90-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1695 patients were enrolled of which 49.5% received intravenous steroids for treatment of septic shock at baseline (DrotAA + steroids N = 436; DrotAA + no steroids N = 414; placebo + steroids N = 403; placebo + no steroids N = 442). The propensity weighted risk of 28-day as well as 90-day mortality in those treated vs. those not treated with steroids did not differ among those randomized to DrotAA vs. placebo (interaction p-value = 0.38 and p = 0.27, respectively) nor was a difference detected within each randomized treatment. Similarly, the course of vasopressor use and cardiovascular SOFA did not appear to be influenced by steroid therapy. In patients with lung infection (N = 744), abdominal infection (N = 510), Gram-positive sepsis (N = 420) and Gram-negative sepsis (N = 461), the propensity weighted risk of 28-day as well as 90-day mortality in those treated vs. those not treated with steroids did not differ among those randomized to DrotAA vs. placebo nor was a difference detected within each randomized treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study of septic shock patients, after adjustment for treatment selection bias, we were unable to find noticeable positive impact from intravenous steroids for treatment of septic shock at baseline either in patients randomized for DrotAA or placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00604214. Registered 24 January 2008. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4456711 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44567112015-06-06 Clinical impact of stress dose steroids in patients with septic shock: insights from the PROWESS-Shock trial Póvoa, Pedro Salluh, Jorge I F Martinez, Maria L Guillamat-Prats, Raquel Gallup, Dianne Al-Khalidi, Hussein R Thompson, B Taylor Ranieri, V Marco Artigas, Antonio Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical impact of the administration of intravenous steroids, alone or in conjunction with drotrecogin-alfa (activated) (DrotAA), on the outcomes in septic shock patients. METHODS: We performed a sub-study of the PROWESS-Shock trial (septic shock patients who received fluids and vasopressors above a predefined threshold for at least 4 hours were randomized to receive either DrotAA or placebo for 96 hours). A propensity score for the administration of intravenous steroids for septic shock at baseline was constructed using multivariable logistic regression. Cox proportional hazards model using inverse probability of treatment weighting of the propensity score was used to estimate the effect of intravenous steroids, alone or in conjunction with DrotAA, on 28-day and 90-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1695 patients were enrolled of which 49.5% received intravenous steroids for treatment of septic shock at baseline (DrotAA + steroids N = 436; DrotAA + no steroids N = 414; placebo + steroids N = 403; placebo + no steroids N = 442). The propensity weighted risk of 28-day as well as 90-day mortality in those treated vs. those not treated with steroids did not differ among those randomized to DrotAA vs. placebo (interaction p-value = 0.38 and p = 0.27, respectively) nor was a difference detected within each randomized treatment. Similarly, the course of vasopressor use and cardiovascular SOFA did not appear to be influenced by steroid therapy. In patients with lung infection (N = 744), abdominal infection (N = 510), Gram-positive sepsis (N = 420) and Gram-negative sepsis (N = 461), the propensity weighted risk of 28-day as well as 90-day mortality in those treated vs. those not treated with steroids did not differ among those randomized to DrotAA vs. placebo nor was a difference detected within each randomized treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study of septic shock patients, after adjustment for treatment selection bias, we were unable to find noticeable positive impact from intravenous steroids for treatment of septic shock at baseline either in patients randomized for DrotAA or placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00604214. Registered 24 January 2008. BioMed Central 2015-04-28 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4456711/ /pubmed/25928214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-0921-x Text en © Póvoa et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Póvoa, Pedro Salluh, Jorge I F Martinez, Maria L Guillamat-Prats, Raquel Gallup, Dianne Al-Khalidi, Hussein R Thompson, B Taylor Ranieri, V Marco Artigas, Antonio Clinical impact of stress dose steroids in patients with septic shock: insights from the PROWESS-Shock trial |
title | Clinical impact of stress dose steroids in patients with septic shock: insights from the PROWESS-Shock trial |
title_full | Clinical impact of stress dose steroids in patients with septic shock: insights from the PROWESS-Shock trial |
title_fullStr | Clinical impact of stress dose steroids in patients with septic shock: insights from the PROWESS-Shock trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical impact of stress dose steroids in patients with septic shock: insights from the PROWESS-Shock trial |
title_short | Clinical impact of stress dose steroids in patients with septic shock: insights from the PROWESS-Shock trial |
title_sort | clinical impact of stress dose steroids in patients with septic shock: insights from the prowess-shock trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25928214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-0921-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT povoapedro clinicalimpactofstressdosesteroidsinpatientswithsepticshockinsightsfromtheprowessshocktrial AT salluhjorgeif clinicalimpactofstressdosesteroidsinpatientswithsepticshockinsightsfromtheprowessshocktrial AT martinezmarial clinicalimpactofstressdosesteroidsinpatientswithsepticshockinsightsfromtheprowessshocktrial AT guillamatpratsraquel clinicalimpactofstressdosesteroidsinpatientswithsepticshockinsightsfromtheprowessshocktrial AT gallupdianne clinicalimpactofstressdosesteroidsinpatientswithsepticshockinsightsfromtheprowessshocktrial AT alkhalidihusseinr clinicalimpactofstressdosesteroidsinpatientswithsepticshockinsightsfromtheprowessshocktrial AT thompsonbtaylor clinicalimpactofstressdosesteroidsinpatientswithsepticshockinsightsfromtheprowessshocktrial AT ranierivmarco clinicalimpactofstressdosesteroidsinpatientswithsepticshockinsightsfromtheprowessshocktrial AT artigasantonio clinicalimpactofstressdosesteroidsinpatientswithsepticshockinsightsfromtheprowessshocktrial |