Cargando…
Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment
INTRODUCTION: Intraoral chair side porcelain repair system is a quick, painless and highly patient acceptable procedure, without removal of restoration or fabrication of new restoration. There are very limited studies conducted to evaluate the shear bond strength of repair systems after different su...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26097354 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.156045 |
_version_ | 1782374875832254464 |
---|---|
author | Kalra, Ashish Mohan, Murali S. Gowda, E. Mahesh |
author_facet | Kalra, Ashish Mohan, Murali S. Gowda, E. Mahesh |
author_sort | Kalra, Ashish |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Intraoral chair side porcelain repair system is a quick, painless and highly patient acceptable procedure, without removal of restoration or fabrication of new restoration. There are very limited studies conducted to evaluate the shear bond strength of repair systems after different surface treatment. OBJECTIVES OF RESEARCH: The objective of research was to evaluate the shear bond strength of two intraoral porcelain repair systems Clearfil repair system (Kuraray) and Ceramic repair system (Ivoclar) to repair metal-ceramic restoration after three different surface treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Totally, 120 discs of base metal alloy were fabricated. The opaque, dentine and enamel of ceramic were applied to achieve the uniform thickness. Defect was created, and repair was done using two repair systems after different surface treatment. Shear bond strength was measured. RESULTS: Analysis of variance was utilized. Ceramic repair system after 40% phosphoric acid surface treatment showed the highest mean value and Clearfil repair system after surface treatment with 37% phosphoric acid showed the lowest. The statistical difference was found to be significant between the groups. CONCLUSION: The shear bond strength of Ceramic repair system with 40% phosphoric acid etching showed highest shear bond strength as compared to other system and surface treatment used in the study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4456741 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44567412015-06-19 Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment Kalra, Ashish Mohan, Murali S. Gowda, E. Mahesh Contemp Clin Dent Original Article INTRODUCTION: Intraoral chair side porcelain repair system is a quick, painless and highly patient acceptable procedure, without removal of restoration or fabrication of new restoration. There are very limited studies conducted to evaluate the shear bond strength of repair systems after different surface treatment. OBJECTIVES OF RESEARCH: The objective of research was to evaluate the shear bond strength of two intraoral porcelain repair systems Clearfil repair system (Kuraray) and Ceramic repair system (Ivoclar) to repair metal-ceramic restoration after three different surface treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Totally, 120 discs of base metal alloy were fabricated. The opaque, dentine and enamel of ceramic were applied to achieve the uniform thickness. Defect was created, and repair was done using two repair systems after different surface treatment. Shear bond strength was measured. RESULTS: Analysis of variance was utilized. Ceramic repair system after 40% phosphoric acid surface treatment showed the highest mean value and Clearfil repair system after surface treatment with 37% phosphoric acid showed the lowest. The statistical difference was found to be significant between the groups. CONCLUSION: The shear bond strength of Ceramic repair system with 40% phosphoric acid etching showed highest shear bond strength as compared to other system and surface treatment used in the study. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4456741/ /pubmed/26097354 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.156045 Text en Copyright: © Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kalra, Ashish Mohan, Murali S. Gowda, E. Mahesh Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment |
title | Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment |
title_full | Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment |
title_fullStr | Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment |
title_short | Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment |
title_sort | comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26097354 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.156045 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kalraashish comparisonofshearbondstrengthoftwoporcelainrepairsystemsafterdifferentsurfacetreatment AT mohanmuralis comparisonofshearbondstrengthoftwoporcelainrepairsystemsafterdifferentsurfacetreatment AT gowdaemahesh comparisonofshearbondstrengthoftwoporcelainrepairsystemsafterdifferentsurfacetreatment |