Cargando…

Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment

INTRODUCTION: Intraoral chair side porcelain repair system is a quick, painless and highly patient acceptable procedure, without removal of restoration or fabrication of new restoration. There are very limited studies conducted to evaluate the shear bond strength of repair systems after different su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kalra, Ashish, Mohan, Murali S., Gowda, E. Mahesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26097354
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.156045
_version_ 1782374875832254464
author Kalra, Ashish
Mohan, Murali S.
Gowda, E. Mahesh
author_facet Kalra, Ashish
Mohan, Murali S.
Gowda, E. Mahesh
author_sort Kalra, Ashish
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Intraoral chair side porcelain repair system is a quick, painless and highly patient acceptable procedure, without removal of restoration or fabrication of new restoration. There are very limited studies conducted to evaluate the shear bond strength of repair systems after different surface treatment. OBJECTIVES OF RESEARCH: The objective of research was to evaluate the shear bond strength of two intraoral porcelain repair systems Clearfil repair system (Kuraray) and Ceramic repair system (Ivoclar) to repair metal-ceramic restoration after three different surface treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Totally, 120 discs of base metal alloy were fabricated. The opaque, dentine and enamel of ceramic were applied to achieve the uniform thickness. Defect was created, and repair was done using two repair systems after different surface treatment. Shear bond strength was measured. RESULTS: Analysis of variance was utilized. Ceramic repair system after 40% phosphoric acid surface treatment showed the highest mean value and Clearfil repair system after surface treatment with 37% phosphoric acid showed the lowest. The statistical difference was found to be significant between the groups. CONCLUSION: The shear bond strength of Ceramic repair system with 40% phosphoric acid etching showed highest shear bond strength as compared to other system and surface treatment used in the study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4456741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44567412015-06-19 Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment Kalra, Ashish Mohan, Murali S. Gowda, E. Mahesh Contemp Clin Dent Original Article INTRODUCTION: Intraoral chair side porcelain repair system is a quick, painless and highly patient acceptable procedure, without removal of restoration or fabrication of new restoration. There are very limited studies conducted to evaluate the shear bond strength of repair systems after different surface treatment. OBJECTIVES OF RESEARCH: The objective of research was to evaluate the shear bond strength of two intraoral porcelain repair systems Clearfil repair system (Kuraray) and Ceramic repair system (Ivoclar) to repair metal-ceramic restoration after three different surface treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Totally, 120 discs of base metal alloy were fabricated. The opaque, dentine and enamel of ceramic were applied to achieve the uniform thickness. Defect was created, and repair was done using two repair systems after different surface treatment. Shear bond strength was measured. RESULTS: Analysis of variance was utilized. Ceramic repair system after 40% phosphoric acid surface treatment showed the highest mean value and Clearfil repair system after surface treatment with 37% phosphoric acid showed the lowest. The statistical difference was found to be significant between the groups. CONCLUSION: The shear bond strength of Ceramic repair system with 40% phosphoric acid etching showed highest shear bond strength as compared to other system and surface treatment used in the study. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4456741/ /pubmed/26097354 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.156045 Text en Copyright: © Contemporary Clinical Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kalra, Ashish
Mohan, Murali S.
Gowda, E. Mahesh
Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment
title Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment
title_full Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment
title_fullStr Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment
title_short Comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment
title_sort comparison of shear bond strength of two porcelain repair systems after different surface treatment
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26097354
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.156045
work_keys_str_mv AT kalraashish comparisonofshearbondstrengthoftwoporcelainrepairsystemsafterdifferentsurfacetreatment
AT mohanmuralis comparisonofshearbondstrengthoftwoporcelainrepairsystemsafterdifferentsurfacetreatment
AT gowdaemahesh comparisonofshearbondstrengthoftwoporcelainrepairsystemsafterdifferentsurfacetreatment