Cargando…

Research capacity of respiratory therapists: A survey of views, opinions and barriers

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is increasing in health care services. This means that respiratory therapists (RTs) should be effective consumers, users and producers of scientific research pertaining to respiratory therapy technology and respiratory physiology. However, little is known ab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martins, Concetta, Kenaszchuk, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pulsus Group Inc 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26078597
_version_ 1782374893232324608
author Martins, Concetta
Kenaszchuk, Chris
author_facet Martins, Concetta
Kenaszchuk, Chris
author_sort Martins, Concetta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is increasing in health care services. This means that respiratory therapists (RTs) should be effective consumers, users and producers of scientific research pertaining to respiratory therapy technology and respiratory physiology. However, little is known about RT opinions and attitudes toward research. Survey instruments to measure them are also uncommon. OBJECTIVE: The present article presents the results of a survey of RTs regarding research attitudes including interest, self-perceived skill and barriers. METHODS: A survey was developed in consultation with practicing RTs and education researchers. It was fielded in six academic hospitals in Toronto, Ontario. Surveys were completed and returned anonymously. Descriptive statistics and associations were examined. Subgroup differences were tested using ANOVA methods. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 112 RTs (response rate 26.9%). The majority (approximately 80%) of respondents agreed that respiratory therapy research is important, that research can advance the profession and that RTs are suited to performing respiratory therapy research. More than 70% were interested in performing research as long as barriers were eliminated. Among eight potential barriers, lack of time was ranked as the top barrier 59% of the time. Lack of interest in performing research was the least relevant barrier. RTs’ educational attainment was positively associated with willingness to perform research and belief in having the skills needed for research. CONCLUSION: Many RTs want to conduct research. They would need substantial support, including increased research exposure during respiratory therapy training, more time and support from trained researchers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4456825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Pulsus Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44568252015-06-15 Research capacity of respiratory therapists: A survey of views, opinions and barriers Martins, Concetta Kenaszchuk, Chris Can J Respir Ther Original Article BACKGROUND: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is increasing in health care services. This means that respiratory therapists (RTs) should be effective consumers, users and producers of scientific research pertaining to respiratory therapy technology and respiratory physiology. However, little is known about RT opinions and attitudes toward research. Survey instruments to measure them are also uncommon. OBJECTIVE: The present article presents the results of a survey of RTs regarding research attitudes including interest, self-perceived skill and barriers. METHODS: A survey was developed in consultation with practicing RTs and education researchers. It was fielded in six academic hospitals in Toronto, Ontario. Surveys were completed and returned anonymously. Descriptive statistics and associations were examined. Subgroup differences were tested using ANOVA methods. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 112 RTs (response rate 26.9%). The majority (approximately 80%) of respondents agreed that respiratory therapy research is important, that research can advance the profession and that RTs are suited to performing respiratory therapy research. More than 70% were interested in performing research as long as barriers were eliminated. Among eight potential barriers, lack of time was ranked as the top barrier 59% of the time. Lack of interest in performing research was the least relevant barrier. RTs’ educational attainment was positively associated with willingness to perform research and belief in having the skills needed for research. CONCLUSION: Many RTs want to conduct research. They would need substantial support, including increased research exposure during respiratory therapy training, more time and support from trained researchers. Pulsus Group Inc 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC4456825/ /pubmed/26078597 Text en © 2013 Canadian Society of Respiratory Therapists. All rights reserved The Journal adheres to the Creative Commons Licence “Attribution - Non Commercial - CC BY-NC” for all OPEN ACCESS submissions. The publisher reserves commercial copyright on all published material, and permits individual copy reproduction and use in any medium provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Martins, Concetta
Kenaszchuk, Chris
Research capacity of respiratory therapists: A survey of views, opinions and barriers
title Research capacity of respiratory therapists: A survey of views, opinions and barriers
title_full Research capacity of respiratory therapists: A survey of views, opinions and barriers
title_fullStr Research capacity of respiratory therapists: A survey of views, opinions and barriers
title_full_unstemmed Research capacity of respiratory therapists: A survey of views, opinions and barriers
title_short Research capacity of respiratory therapists: A survey of views, opinions and barriers
title_sort research capacity of respiratory therapists: a survey of views, opinions and barriers
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26078597
work_keys_str_mv AT martinsconcetta researchcapacityofrespiratorytherapistsasurveyofviewsopinionsandbarriers
AT kenaszchukchris researchcapacityofrespiratorytherapistsasurveyofviewsopinionsandbarriers