Cargando…

To PAPR or not to PAPR?

The present outbreak of Ebola has health care professionals seeking guidance on isolation precautions for routine care and aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs). The most recent guidelines state that during AGPs, health care professionals should wear respiratory protection at least as protective as a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Roberts, Vanessa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pulsus Group Inc 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26078617
_version_ 1782374896038313984
author Roberts, Vanessa
author_facet Roberts, Vanessa
author_sort Roberts, Vanessa
collection PubMed
description The present outbreak of Ebola has health care professionals seeking guidance on isolation precautions for routine care and aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs). The most recent guidelines state that during AGPs, health care professionals should wear respiratory protection at least as protective as a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health-certified fit tested N95 filtering face piece respirator or higher; for example, a powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR). The present review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of using a PAPR versus an N95 mask, and relates the experience of the Jewish General Hospital (Montreal, Quebec) of PAPR policy implementation. Training programs on proper donning and doffing of personal protective equipment and quality control systems need to be in place. Respiratory therapists are frontline during AGPs and need to be active in the decision making of the type of equipment chosen to protect them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4456839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Pulsus Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44568392015-06-15 To PAPR or not to PAPR? Roberts, Vanessa Can J Respir Ther Review The present outbreak of Ebola has health care professionals seeking guidance on isolation precautions for routine care and aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs). The most recent guidelines state that during AGPs, health care professionals should wear respiratory protection at least as protective as a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health-certified fit tested N95 filtering face piece respirator or higher; for example, a powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR). The present review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of using a PAPR versus an N95 mask, and relates the experience of the Jewish General Hospital (Montreal, Quebec) of PAPR policy implementation. Training programs on proper donning and doffing of personal protective equipment and quality control systems need to be in place. Respiratory therapists are frontline during AGPs and need to be active in the decision making of the type of equipment chosen to protect them. Pulsus Group Inc 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4456839/ /pubmed/26078617 Text en ©2014 Canadian Society of Respiratory Therapists. All rights reserved The Journal adheres to the Creative Commons Licence “Attribution - Non Commercial - CC BY-NC” for all OPEN ACCESS submissions. The publisher reserves commercial copyright on all published material, and permits individual copy reproduction and use in any medium provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Roberts, Vanessa
To PAPR or not to PAPR?
title To PAPR or not to PAPR?
title_full To PAPR or not to PAPR?
title_fullStr To PAPR or not to PAPR?
title_full_unstemmed To PAPR or not to PAPR?
title_short To PAPR or not to PAPR?
title_sort to papr or not to papr?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26078617
work_keys_str_mv AT robertsvanessa topaprornottopapr