Cargando…
To PAPR or not to PAPR?
The present outbreak of Ebola has health care professionals seeking guidance on isolation precautions for routine care and aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs). The most recent guidelines state that during AGPs, health care professionals should wear respiratory protection at least as protective as a...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pulsus Group Inc
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26078617 |
_version_ | 1782374896038313984 |
---|---|
author | Roberts, Vanessa |
author_facet | Roberts, Vanessa |
author_sort | Roberts, Vanessa |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present outbreak of Ebola has health care professionals seeking guidance on isolation precautions for routine care and aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs). The most recent guidelines state that during AGPs, health care professionals should wear respiratory protection at least as protective as a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health-certified fit tested N95 filtering face piece respirator or higher; for example, a powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR). The present review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of using a PAPR versus an N95 mask, and relates the experience of the Jewish General Hospital (Montreal, Quebec) of PAPR policy implementation. Training programs on proper donning and doffing of personal protective equipment and quality control systems need to be in place. Respiratory therapists are frontline during AGPs and need to be active in the decision making of the type of equipment chosen to protect them. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4456839 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Pulsus Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44568392015-06-15 To PAPR or not to PAPR? Roberts, Vanessa Can J Respir Ther Review The present outbreak of Ebola has health care professionals seeking guidance on isolation precautions for routine care and aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs). The most recent guidelines state that during AGPs, health care professionals should wear respiratory protection at least as protective as a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health-certified fit tested N95 filtering face piece respirator or higher; for example, a powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR). The present review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of using a PAPR versus an N95 mask, and relates the experience of the Jewish General Hospital (Montreal, Quebec) of PAPR policy implementation. Training programs on proper donning and doffing of personal protective equipment and quality control systems need to be in place. Respiratory therapists are frontline during AGPs and need to be active in the decision making of the type of equipment chosen to protect them. Pulsus Group Inc 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4456839/ /pubmed/26078617 Text en ©2014 Canadian Society of Respiratory Therapists. All rights reserved The Journal adheres to the Creative Commons Licence “Attribution - Non Commercial - CC BY-NC” for all OPEN ACCESS submissions. The publisher reserves commercial copyright on all published material, and permits individual copy reproduction and use in any medium provided the work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Roberts, Vanessa To PAPR or not to PAPR? |
title | To PAPR or not to PAPR? |
title_full | To PAPR or not to PAPR? |
title_fullStr | To PAPR or not to PAPR? |
title_full_unstemmed | To PAPR or not to PAPR? |
title_short | To PAPR or not to PAPR? |
title_sort | to papr or not to papr? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4456839/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26078617 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robertsvanessa topaprornottopapr |