Cargando…
How do we improve peer review for manuscripts from culturally divergent origins?
Objective and informed peer review is critically important to the progress of science. These standards can sometimes be at risk in the evaluation of manuscripts from less culturally familiar places and such evaluations therefore require particular vigilance. Alternative publication strategies may be...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
| Lenguaje: | English |
| Publicado: |
F1000Research
2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4457103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26097688 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.5704.1 |
| _version_ | 1782374937925779456 |
|---|---|
| author | Dart, Anthony |
| author_facet | Dart, Anthony |
| author_sort | Dart, Anthony |
| collection | PubMed |
| description | Objective and informed peer review is critically important to the progress of science. These standards can sometimes be at risk in the evaluation of manuscripts from less culturally familiar places and such evaluations therefore require particular vigilance. Alternative publication strategies may be particularly helpful in these circumstances. |
| format | Online Article Text |
| id | pubmed-4457103 |
| institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publisher | F1000Research |
| record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
| spelling | pubmed-44571032015-06-19 How do we improve peer review for manuscripts from culturally divergent origins? Dart, Anthony F1000Res Editorial Objective and informed peer review is critically important to the progress of science. These standards can sometimes be at risk in the evaluation of manuscripts from less culturally familiar places and such evaluations therefore require particular vigilance. Alternative publication strategies may be particularly helpful in these circumstances. F1000Research 2015-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4457103/ /pubmed/26097688 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.5704.1 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Dart A http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication). |
| spellingShingle | Editorial Dart, Anthony How do we improve peer review for manuscripts from culturally divergent origins? |
| title | How do we improve peer review for manuscripts from culturally divergent origins? |
| title_full | How do we improve peer review for manuscripts from culturally divergent origins? |
| title_fullStr | How do we improve peer review for manuscripts from culturally divergent origins? |
| title_full_unstemmed | How do we improve peer review for manuscripts from culturally divergent origins? |
| title_short | How do we improve peer review for manuscripts from culturally divergent origins? |
| title_sort | how do we improve peer review for manuscripts from culturally divergent origins? |
| topic | Editorial |
| url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4457103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26097688 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.5704.1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dartanthony howdoweimprovepeerreviewformanuscriptsfromculturallydivergentorigins |