Cargando…

The five deadly sins of science publishing

Science cannot progress without scientists reporting their findings. And yet researchers have given control of this central pillar of the scientific process to science publishers, who are in the business of serving the interests of their journals; these are not always the same as the interests of sc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Tracz, Vitek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000Research 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4457117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26097694
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6488.1
_version_ 1782374940802023424
author Tracz, Vitek
author_facet Tracz, Vitek
author_sort Tracz, Vitek
collection PubMed
description Science cannot progress without scientists reporting their findings. And yet researchers have given control of this central pillar of the scientific process to science publishers, who are in the business of serving the interests of their journals; these are not always the same as the interests of science. This editorial describes the problems with the process of preparing and publishing research findings, and with judging their veracity and significance, and then explains how we at Faculty of 1000 are starting to tackle the ‘deadly sins’ of science publishing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4457117
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher F1000Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44571172015-06-19 The five deadly sins of science publishing Tracz, Vitek F1000Res Editorial Science cannot progress without scientists reporting their findings. And yet researchers have given control of this central pillar of the scientific process to science publishers, who are in the business of serving the interests of their journals; these are not always the same as the interests of science. This editorial describes the problems with the process of preparing and publishing research findings, and with judging their veracity and significance, and then explains how we at Faculty of 1000 are starting to tackle the ‘deadly sins’ of science publishing. F1000Research 2015-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4457117/ /pubmed/26097694 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6488.1 Text en Copyright: © 2015 Tracz V http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).
spellingShingle Editorial
Tracz, Vitek
The five deadly sins of science publishing
title The five deadly sins of science publishing
title_full The five deadly sins of science publishing
title_fullStr The five deadly sins of science publishing
title_full_unstemmed The five deadly sins of science publishing
title_short The five deadly sins of science publishing
title_sort five deadly sins of science publishing
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4457117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26097694
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6488.1
work_keys_str_mv AT traczvitek thefivedeadlysinsofsciencepublishing
AT traczvitek fivedeadlysinsofsciencepublishing