Cargando…
Bioinformatic Amplicon Read Processing Strategies Strongly Affect Eukaryotic Diversity and the Taxonomic Composition of Communities
Amplicon read sequencing has revolutionized the field of microbial diversity studies. The technique has been developed for bacterial assemblages and has undergone rigorous testing with mock communities. However, due to the great complexity of eukaryotes and the numbers of different rDNA copies, anal...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4457843/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26047335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130035 |
_version_ | 1782375006275108864 |
---|---|
author | Majaneva, Markus Hyytiäinen, Kirsi Varvio, Sirkka Liisa Nagai, Satoshi Blomster, Jaanika |
author_facet | Majaneva, Markus Hyytiäinen, Kirsi Varvio, Sirkka Liisa Nagai, Satoshi Blomster, Jaanika |
author_sort | Majaneva, Markus |
collection | PubMed |
description | Amplicon read sequencing has revolutionized the field of microbial diversity studies. The technique has been developed for bacterial assemblages and has undergone rigorous testing with mock communities. However, due to the great complexity of eukaryotes and the numbers of different rDNA copies, analyzing eukaryotic diversity is more demanding than analyzing bacterial or mock communities, so studies are needed that test the methods of analyses on taxonomically diverse natural communities. In this study, we used 20 samples collected from the Baltic Sea ice, slush and under-ice water to investigate three program packages (UPARSE, mothur and QIIME) and 18 different bioinformatic strategies implemented in them. Our aim was to assess the impact of the initial steps of bioinformatic strategies on the results when analyzing natural eukaryotic communities. We found significant differences among the strategies in resulting read length, number of OTUs and estimates of diversity as well as clear differences in the taxonomic composition of communities. The differences arose mainly because of the variable number of chimeric reads that passed the pre-processing steps. Singleton removal and denoising substantially lowered the number of errors. Our study showed that the initial steps of the bioinformatic amplicon read processing strategies require careful consideration before applying them to eukaryotic communities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4457843 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44578432015-06-09 Bioinformatic Amplicon Read Processing Strategies Strongly Affect Eukaryotic Diversity and the Taxonomic Composition of Communities Majaneva, Markus Hyytiäinen, Kirsi Varvio, Sirkka Liisa Nagai, Satoshi Blomster, Jaanika PLoS One Research Article Amplicon read sequencing has revolutionized the field of microbial diversity studies. The technique has been developed for bacterial assemblages and has undergone rigorous testing with mock communities. However, due to the great complexity of eukaryotes and the numbers of different rDNA copies, analyzing eukaryotic diversity is more demanding than analyzing bacterial or mock communities, so studies are needed that test the methods of analyses on taxonomically diverse natural communities. In this study, we used 20 samples collected from the Baltic Sea ice, slush and under-ice water to investigate three program packages (UPARSE, mothur and QIIME) and 18 different bioinformatic strategies implemented in them. Our aim was to assess the impact of the initial steps of bioinformatic strategies on the results when analyzing natural eukaryotic communities. We found significant differences among the strategies in resulting read length, number of OTUs and estimates of diversity as well as clear differences in the taxonomic composition of communities. The differences arose mainly because of the variable number of chimeric reads that passed the pre-processing steps. Singleton removal and denoising substantially lowered the number of errors. Our study showed that the initial steps of the bioinformatic amplicon read processing strategies require careful consideration before applying them to eukaryotic communities. Public Library of Science 2015-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4457843/ /pubmed/26047335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130035 Text en © 2015 Majaneva et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Majaneva, Markus Hyytiäinen, Kirsi Varvio, Sirkka Liisa Nagai, Satoshi Blomster, Jaanika Bioinformatic Amplicon Read Processing Strategies Strongly Affect Eukaryotic Diversity and the Taxonomic Composition of Communities |
title | Bioinformatic Amplicon Read Processing Strategies Strongly Affect Eukaryotic Diversity and the Taxonomic Composition of Communities |
title_full | Bioinformatic Amplicon Read Processing Strategies Strongly Affect Eukaryotic Diversity and the Taxonomic Composition of Communities |
title_fullStr | Bioinformatic Amplicon Read Processing Strategies Strongly Affect Eukaryotic Diversity and the Taxonomic Composition of Communities |
title_full_unstemmed | Bioinformatic Amplicon Read Processing Strategies Strongly Affect Eukaryotic Diversity and the Taxonomic Composition of Communities |
title_short | Bioinformatic Amplicon Read Processing Strategies Strongly Affect Eukaryotic Diversity and the Taxonomic Composition of Communities |
title_sort | bioinformatic amplicon read processing strategies strongly affect eukaryotic diversity and the taxonomic composition of communities |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4457843/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26047335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130035 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT majanevamarkus bioinformaticampliconreadprocessingstrategiesstronglyaffecteukaryoticdiversityandthetaxonomiccompositionofcommunities AT hyytiainenkirsi bioinformaticampliconreadprocessingstrategiesstronglyaffecteukaryoticdiversityandthetaxonomiccompositionofcommunities AT varviosirkkaliisa bioinformaticampliconreadprocessingstrategiesstronglyaffecteukaryoticdiversityandthetaxonomiccompositionofcommunities AT nagaisatoshi bioinformaticampliconreadprocessingstrategiesstronglyaffecteukaryoticdiversityandthetaxonomiccompositionofcommunities AT blomsterjaanika bioinformaticampliconreadprocessingstrategiesstronglyaffecteukaryoticdiversityandthetaxonomiccompositionofcommunities |