Cargando…

Impact of add-on laboratory testing at an academic medical center: a five year retrospective study

BACKGROUND: Clinical laboratories frequently receive orders to perform additional tests on existing specimens (‘add-ons’). Previous studies have examined add-on ordering patterns over short periods of time. The objective of this study was to analyze add-on ordering patterns over an extended time per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nelson, Louis S., Davis, Scott R., Humble, Robert M., Kulhavy, Jeff, Aman, Dean R., Krasowski, Matthew D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4458334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26052250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12907-015-0011-7
_version_ 1782375076976394240
author Nelson, Louis S.
Davis, Scott R.
Humble, Robert M.
Kulhavy, Jeff
Aman, Dean R.
Krasowski, Matthew D.
author_facet Nelson, Louis S.
Davis, Scott R.
Humble, Robert M.
Kulhavy, Jeff
Aman, Dean R.
Krasowski, Matthew D.
author_sort Nelson, Louis S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical laboratories frequently receive orders to perform additional tests on existing specimens (‘add-ons’). Previous studies have examined add-on ordering patterns over short periods of time. The objective of this study was to analyze add-on ordering patterns over an extended time period. We also analyzed the impact of a robotic specimen archival/retrieval system on add-on testing procedure and manual effort. METHODS: In this retrospective study at an academic medical center, electronic health records from were searched to obtain all add-on orders that were placed in the time period of May 2, 2009 to December 31, 2014. RESULTS: During the time period of retrospective study, 880,359 add-on tests were ordered on 96,244 different patients. Add-on testing comprised 3.3 % of total test volumes. There were 443,411 unique ordering instances, leading to an average of 1.99 add-on tests per instance. Some patients had multiple episodes of add-on test orders at different points in time, leading to an average of 9.15 add-on tests per patient. The majority of add-on orders were for chemistry tests (78.8 % of total add-ons) with the next most frequent being hematology and coagulation tests (11.2 % of total add-ons). Inpatient orders accounted for 66.8 % of total add-on orders, while the emergency department and outpatient clinics had 14.8 % and 18.4 % of total add-on orders, respectively. The majority of add-ons were placed within 8 hours (87.3 %) and nearly all by 24 hours (96.8 %). Nearly 100 % of add-on orders within the emergency department were placed within 8 hours. The introduction of a robotic specimen archival/retrieval unit saved an average of 2.75 minutes of laboratory staff manual time per unique add-on order. This translates to 24.1 hours/day less manual effort in dealing with add-on orders. CONCLUSION: Our study reflects the previous literature in showing that add-on orders significantly impact the workload of the clinical laboratory. The majority of add-on orders are clinical chemistry tests, and most add-on orders occur within 24 hours of original specimen collection. Robotic specimen archival/retrieval units can reduce manual effort in the clinical laboratory associated with add-on orders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4458334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44583342015-06-08 Impact of add-on laboratory testing at an academic medical center: a five year retrospective study Nelson, Louis S. Davis, Scott R. Humble, Robert M. Kulhavy, Jeff Aman, Dean R. Krasowski, Matthew D. BMC Clin Pathol Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical laboratories frequently receive orders to perform additional tests on existing specimens (‘add-ons’). Previous studies have examined add-on ordering patterns over short periods of time. The objective of this study was to analyze add-on ordering patterns over an extended time period. We also analyzed the impact of a robotic specimen archival/retrieval system on add-on testing procedure and manual effort. METHODS: In this retrospective study at an academic medical center, electronic health records from were searched to obtain all add-on orders that were placed in the time period of May 2, 2009 to December 31, 2014. RESULTS: During the time period of retrospective study, 880,359 add-on tests were ordered on 96,244 different patients. Add-on testing comprised 3.3 % of total test volumes. There were 443,411 unique ordering instances, leading to an average of 1.99 add-on tests per instance. Some patients had multiple episodes of add-on test orders at different points in time, leading to an average of 9.15 add-on tests per patient. The majority of add-on orders were for chemistry tests (78.8 % of total add-ons) with the next most frequent being hematology and coagulation tests (11.2 % of total add-ons). Inpatient orders accounted for 66.8 % of total add-on orders, while the emergency department and outpatient clinics had 14.8 % and 18.4 % of total add-on orders, respectively. The majority of add-ons were placed within 8 hours (87.3 %) and nearly all by 24 hours (96.8 %). Nearly 100 % of add-on orders within the emergency department were placed within 8 hours. The introduction of a robotic specimen archival/retrieval unit saved an average of 2.75 minutes of laboratory staff manual time per unique add-on order. This translates to 24.1 hours/day less manual effort in dealing with add-on orders. CONCLUSION: Our study reflects the previous literature in showing that add-on orders significantly impact the workload of the clinical laboratory. The majority of add-on orders are clinical chemistry tests, and most add-on orders occur within 24 hours of original specimen collection. Robotic specimen archival/retrieval units can reduce manual effort in the clinical laboratory associated with add-on orders. BioMed Central 2015-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4458334/ /pubmed/26052250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12907-015-0011-7 Text en © Nelson et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nelson, Louis S.
Davis, Scott R.
Humble, Robert M.
Kulhavy, Jeff
Aman, Dean R.
Krasowski, Matthew D.
Impact of add-on laboratory testing at an academic medical center: a five year retrospective study
title Impact of add-on laboratory testing at an academic medical center: a five year retrospective study
title_full Impact of add-on laboratory testing at an academic medical center: a five year retrospective study
title_fullStr Impact of add-on laboratory testing at an academic medical center: a five year retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of add-on laboratory testing at an academic medical center: a five year retrospective study
title_short Impact of add-on laboratory testing at an academic medical center: a five year retrospective study
title_sort impact of add-on laboratory testing at an academic medical center: a five year retrospective study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4458334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26052250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12907-015-0011-7
work_keys_str_mv AT nelsonlouiss impactofaddonlaboratorytestingatanacademicmedicalcenterafiveyearretrospectivestudy
AT davisscottr impactofaddonlaboratorytestingatanacademicmedicalcenterafiveyearretrospectivestudy
AT humblerobertm impactofaddonlaboratorytestingatanacademicmedicalcenterafiveyearretrospectivestudy
AT kulhavyjeff impactofaddonlaboratorytestingatanacademicmedicalcenterafiveyearretrospectivestudy
AT amandeanr impactofaddonlaboratorytestingatanacademicmedicalcenterafiveyearretrospectivestudy
AT krasowskimatthewd impactofaddonlaboratorytestingatanacademicmedicalcenterafiveyearretrospectivestudy