Cargando…
Minimising post-operative risk using a Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool (PACT): protocol for a prospective observational study and cost-effectiveness analysis
INTRODUCTION: While the risk of adverse events following surgery has been identified, the impact of nursing care on early detection of these events is not well established. A systematic review of the evidence and an expert consensus study in post-anaesthetic care identified essential criteria for nu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4458583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26033942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007200 |
_version_ | 1782375104062160896 |
---|---|
author | Street, Maryann Phillips, Nicole M Kent, Bridie Colgan, Stephen Mohebbi, Mohammadreza |
author_facet | Street, Maryann Phillips, Nicole M Kent, Bridie Colgan, Stephen Mohebbi, Mohammadreza |
author_sort | Street, Maryann |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: While the risk of adverse events following surgery has been identified, the impact of nursing care on early detection of these events is not well established. A systematic review of the evidence and an expert consensus study in post-anaesthetic care identified essential criteria for nursing assessment of patient readiness for discharge from the post-anaesthetic care unit (PACU). These criteria were included in a new nursing assessment tool, the Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool (PACT), and incorporated into the post-anaesthetic documentation at a large health service. The aim of this study is to test the clinical reliability of the PACT and evaluate whether the use of PACT will (1) enhance the recognition and response to patients at risk of deterioration in PACU; (2) improve documentation for handover from PACU nurse to ward nurse; (3) result in improved patient outcomes and (4) reduce healthcare costs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective, non-randomised, pre-implementation and post-implementation design comparing: (1) patients (n=750) who have surgery prior to the implementation of the PACT and (2) patients (n=750) who have surgery after PACT. The study will examine the use of the tool through the observation of patient care and nursing handover. Patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness will be determined from health service data and medical record audit. Descriptive statistics will be used to describe the sample and compare the two patient groups (pre-intervention and post-intervention). Differences in patient outcomes between the two groups will be compared using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test and regression analyses and reported as ORs with the corresponding 95% CIs. CONCLUSIONS: This study will test the clinical reliability and cost-effectiveness of the PACT. It is hypothesised that the PACT will enable nurses to recognise and respond to patients at risk of deterioration, improve handover to ward nurses, improve patient outcomes, and reduce healthcare costs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4458583 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44585832015-06-10 Minimising post-operative risk using a Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool (PACT): protocol for a prospective observational study and cost-effectiveness analysis Street, Maryann Phillips, Nicole M Kent, Bridie Colgan, Stephen Mohebbi, Mohammadreza BMJ Open Nursing INTRODUCTION: While the risk of adverse events following surgery has been identified, the impact of nursing care on early detection of these events is not well established. A systematic review of the evidence and an expert consensus study in post-anaesthetic care identified essential criteria for nursing assessment of patient readiness for discharge from the post-anaesthetic care unit (PACU). These criteria were included in a new nursing assessment tool, the Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool (PACT), and incorporated into the post-anaesthetic documentation at a large health service. The aim of this study is to test the clinical reliability of the PACT and evaluate whether the use of PACT will (1) enhance the recognition and response to patients at risk of deterioration in PACU; (2) improve documentation for handover from PACU nurse to ward nurse; (3) result in improved patient outcomes and (4) reduce healthcare costs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective, non-randomised, pre-implementation and post-implementation design comparing: (1) patients (n=750) who have surgery prior to the implementation of the PACT and (2) patients (n=750) who have surgery after PACT. The study will examine the use of the tool through the observation of patient care and nursing handover. Patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness will be determined from health service data and medical record audit. Descriptive statistics will be used to describe the sample and compare the two patient groups (pre-intervention and post-intervention). Differences in patient outcomes between the two groups will be compared using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test and regression analyses and reported as ORs with the corresponding 95% CIs. CONCLUSIONS: This study will test the clinical reliability and cost-effectiveness of the PACT. It is hypothesised that the PACT will enable nurses to recognise and respond to patients at risk of deterioration, improve handover to ward nurses, improve patient outcomes, and reduce healthcare costs. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4458583/ /pubmed/26033942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007200 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Nursing Street, Maryann Phillips, Nicole M Kent, Bridie Colgan, Stephen Mohebbi, Mohammadreza Minimising post-operative risk using a Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool (PACT): protocol for a prospective observational study and cost-effectiveness analysis |
title | Minimising post-operative risk using a Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool (PACT): protocol for a prospective observational study and cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_full | Minimising post-operative risk using a Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool (PACT): protocol for a prospective observational study and cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_fullStr | Minimising post-operative risk using a Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool (PACT): protocol for a prospective observational study and cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimising post-operative risk using a Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool (PACT): protocol for a prospective observational study and cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_short | Minimising post-operative risk using a Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool (PACT): protocol for a prospective observational study and cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_sort | minimising post-operative risk using a post-anaesthetic care tool (pact): protocol for a prospective observational study and cost-effectiveness analysis |
topic | Nursing |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4458583/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26033942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007200 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT streetmaryann minimisingpostoperativeriskusingapostanaestheticcaretoolpactprotocolforaprospectiveobservationalstudyandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT phillipsnicolem minimisingpostoperativeriskusingapostanaestheticcaretoolpactprotocolforaprospectiveobservationalstudyandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT kentbridie minimisingpostoperativeriskusingapostanaestheticcaretoolpactprotocolforaprospectiveobservationalstudyandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT colganstephen minimisingpostoperativeriskusingapostanaestheticcaretoolpactprotocolforaprospectiveobservationalstudyandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT mohebbimohammadreza minimisingpostoperativeriskusingapostanaestheticcaretoolpactprotocolforaprospectiveobservationalstudyandcosteffectivenessanalysis |