Cargando…

Minimising post-operative risk using a Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool (PACT): protocol for a prospective observational study and cost-effectiveness analysis

INTRODUCTION: While the risk of adverse events following surgery has been identified, the impact of nursing care on early detection of these events is not well established. A systematic review of the evidence and an expert consensus study in post-anaesthetic care identified essential criteria for nu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Street, Maryann, Phillips, Nicole M, Kent, Bridie, Colgan, Stephen, Mohebbi, Mohammadreza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4458583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26033942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007200
_version_ 1782375104062160896
author Street, Maryann
Phillips, Nicole M
Kent, Bridie
Colgan, Stephen
Mohebbi, Mohammadreza
author_facet Street, Maryann
Phillips, Nicole M
Kent, Bridie
Colgan, Stephen
Mohebbi, Mohammadreza
author_sort Street, Maryann
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: While the risk of adverse events following surgery has been identified, the impact of nursing care on early detection of these events is not well established. A systematic review of the evidence and an expert consensus study in post-anaesthetic care identified essential criteria for nursing assessment of patient readiness for discharge from the post-anaesthetic care unit (PACU). These criteria were included in a new nursing assessment tool, the Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool (PACT), and incorporated into the post-anaesthetic documentation at a large health service. The aim of this study is to test the clinical reliability of the PACT and evaluate whether the use of PACT will (1) enhance the recognition and response to patients at risk of deterioration in PACU; (2) improve documentation for handover from PACU nurse to ward nurse; (3) result in improved patient outcomes and (4) reduce healthcare costs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective, non-randomised, pre-implementation and post-implementation design comparing: (1) patients (n=750) who have surgery prior to the implementation of the PACT and (2) patients (n=750) who have surgery after PACT. The study will examine the use of the tool through the observation of patient care and nursing handover. Patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness will be determined from health service data and medical record audit. Descriptive statistics will be used to describe the sample and compare the two patient groups (pre-intervention and post-intervention). Differences in patient outcomes between the two groups will be compared using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test and regression analyses and reported as ORs with the corresponding 95% CIs. CONCLUSIONS: This study will test the clinical reliability and cost-effectiveness of the PACT. It is hypothesised that the PACT will enable nurses to recognise and respond to patients at risk of deterioration, improve handover to ward nurses, improve patient outcomes, and reduce healthcare costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4458583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44585832015-06-10 Minimising post-operative risk using a Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool (PACT): protocol for a prospective observational study and cost-effectiveness analysis Street, Maryann Phillips, Nicole M Kent, Bridie Colgan, Stephen Mohebbi, Mohammadreza BMJ Open Nursing INTRODUCTION: While the risk of adverse events following surgery has been identified, the impact of nursing care on early detection of these events is not well established. A systematic review of the evidence and an expert consensus study in post-anaesthetic care identified essential criteria for nursing assessment of patient readiness for discharge from the post-anaesthetic care unit (PACU). These criteria were included in a new nursing assessment tool, the Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool (PACT), and incorporated into the post-anaesthetic documentation at a large health service. The aim of this study is to test the clinical reliability of the PACT and evaluate whether the use of PACT will (1) enhance the recognition and response to patients at risk of deterioration in PACU; (2) improve documentation for handover from PACU nurse to ward nurse; (3) result in improved patient outcomes and (4) reduce healthcare costs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective, non-randomised, pre-implementation and post-implementation design comparing: (1) patients (n=750) who have surgery prior to the implementation of the PACT and (2) patients (n=750) who have surgery after PACT. The study will examine the use of the tool through the observation of patient care and nursing handover. Patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness will be determined from health service data and medical record audit. Descriptive statistics will be used to describe the sample and compare the two patient groups (pre-intervention and post-intervention). Differences in patient outcomes between the two groups will be compared using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test and regression analyses and reported as ORs with the corresponding 95% CIs. CONCLUSIONS: This study will test the clinical reliability and cost-effectiveness of the PACT. It is hypothesised that the PACT will enable nurses to recognise and respond to patients at risk of deterioration, improve handover to ward nurses, improve patient outcomes, and reduce healthcare costs. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4458583/ /pubmed/26033942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007200 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Nursing
Street, Maryann
Phillips, Nicole M
Kent, Bridie
Colgan, Stephen
Mohebbi, Mohammadreza
Minimising post-operative risk using a Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool (PACT): protocol for a prospective observational study and cost-effectiveness analysis
title Minimising post-operative risk using a Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool (PACT): protocol for a prospective observational study and cost-effectiveness analysis
title_full Minimising post-operative risk using a Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool (PACT): protocol for a prospective observational study and cost-effectiveness analysis
title_fullStr Minimising post-operative risk using a Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool (PACT): protocol for a prospective observational study and cost-effectiveness analysis
title_full_unstemmed Minimising post-operative risk using a Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool (PACT): protocol for a prospective observational study and cost-effectiveness analysis
title_short Minimising post-operative risk using a Post-Anaesthetic Care Tool (PACT): protocol for a prospective observational study and cost-effectiveness analysis
title_sort minimising post-operative risk using a post-anaesthetic care tool (pact): protocol for a prospective observational study and cost-effectiveness analysis
topic Nursing
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4458583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26033942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007200
work_keys_str_mv AT streetmaryann minimisingpostoperativeriskusingapostanaestheticcaretoolpactprotocolforaprospectiveobservationalstudyandcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT phillipsnicolem minimisingpostoperativeriskusingapostanaestheticcaretoolpactprotocolforaprospectiveobservationalstudyandcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT kentbridie minimisingpostoperativeriskusingapostanaestheticcaretoolpactprotocolforaprospectiveobservationalstudyandcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT colganstephen minimisingpostoperativeriskusingapostanaestheticcaretoolpactprotocolforaprospectiveobservationalstudyandcosteffectivenessanalysis
AT mohebbimohammadreza minimisingpostoperativeriskusingapostanaestheticcaretoolpactprotocolforaprospectiveobservationalstudyandcosteffectivenessanalysis