Cargando…
Is it Time to Consider the “Burnout Syndrome” A Distinct Illness?
The “burnout syndrome” has been defined as a combination of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment caused by chronic occupational stress. Although there has been increasing medical interest in burnout over the last decades, it is argued in this paper that the sy...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4459038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26106593 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2015.00158 |
_version_ | 1782375156705918976 |
---|---|
author | Bianchi, Renzo Schonfeld, Irvin Sam Laurent, Eric |
author_facet | Bianchi, Renzo Schonfeld, Irvin Sam Laurent, Eric |
author_sort | Bianchi, Renzo |
collection | PubMed |
description | The “burnout syndrome” has been defined as a combination of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment caused by chronic occupational stress. Although there has been increasing medical interest in burnout over the last decades, it is argued in this paper that the syndrome cannot be elevated to the status of diagnostic category, based on (1) an analysis of the genesis of the burnout construct, (2) a review of the latest literature on burnout-depression overlap, (3) a questioning of the three-dimensional structure of the burnout syndrome, and (4) a critical examination of the notion that burnout is singularized by its job-related character. It turns out that the burnout construct is built on a fragile foundation, both from a clinical and a theoretical standpoint. The current state of science suggests that burnout is a form of depression rather than a differentiated type of pathology. The inclusion of burnout in future disorder classifications is therefore unwarranted. The focus of public health policies dedicated to the management of “burnout” should not be narrowed to the three definitional components of the syndrome but consider its depressive core. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4459038 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44590382015-06-23 Is it Time to Consider the “Burnout Syndrome” A Distinct Illness? Bianchi, Renzo Schonfeld, Irvin Sam Laurent, Eric Front Public Health Public Health The “burnout syndrome” has been defined as a combination of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment caused by chronic occupational stress. Although there has been increasing medical interest in burnout over the last decades, it is argued in this paper that the syndrome cannot be elevated to the status of diagnostic category, based on (1) an analysis of the genesis of the burnout construct, (2) a review of the latest literature on burnout-depression overlap, (3) a questioning of the three-dimensional structure of the burnout syndrome, and (4) a critical examination of the notion that burnout is singularized by its job-related character. It turns out that the burnout construct is built on a fragile foundation, both from a clinical and a theoretical standpoint. The current state of science suggests that burnout is a form of depression rather than a differentiated type of pathology. The inclusion of burnout in future disorder classifications is therefore unwarranted. The focus of public health policies dedicated to the management of “burnout” should not be narrowed to the three definitional components of the syndrome but consider its depressive core. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4459038/ /pubmed/26106593 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2015.00158 Text en Copyright © 2015 Bianchi, Schonfeld and Laurent. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Bianchi, Renzo Schonfeld, Irvin Sam Laurent, Eric Is it Time to Consider the “Burnout Syndrome” A Distinct Illness? |
title | Is it Time to Consider the “Burnout Syndrome” A Distinct Illness? |
title_full | Is it Time to Consider the “Burnout Syndrome” A Distinct Illness? |
title_fullStr | Is it Time to Consider the “Burnout Syndrome” A Distinct Illness? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is it Time to Consider the “Burnout Syndrome” A Distinct Illness? |
title_short | Is it Time to Consider the “Burnout Syndrome” A Distinct Illness? |
title_sort | is it time to consider the “burnout syndrome” a distinct illness? |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4459038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26106593 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2015.00158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bianchirenzo isittimetoconsidertheburnoutsyndromeadistinctillness AT schonfeldirvinsam isittimetoconsidertheburnoutsyndromeadistinctillness AT laurenteric isittimetoconsidertheburnoutsyndromeadistinctillness |