Cargando…
On the history of plasma treatment and comparison of microbiostatic efficacy of a historical high-frequency plasma device with two modern devices
Background: Cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) with its many bioactive properties has defined a new medical field: the plasma medicine. However, in the related form of high-frequency therapy, CAP was even used briefly a century ago. The aim of this study was to review historic CAP treatments and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4459170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26124985 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000251 |
_version_ | 1782375180289441792 |
---|---|
author | Napp, Judith Daeschlein, Georg Napp, Matthias von Podewils, Sebastian Gümbel, Denis Spitzmueller, Romy Fornaciari, Paolo Hinz, Peter Jünger, Michael |
author_facet | Napp, Judith Daeschlein, Georg Napp, Matthias von Podewils, Sebastian Gümbel, Denis Spitzmueller, Romy Fornaciari, Paolo Hinz, Peter Jünger, Michael |
author_sort | Napp, Judith |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) with its many bioactive properties has defined a new medical field: the plasma medicine. However, in the related form of high-frequency therapy, CAP was even used briefly a century ago. The aim of this study was to review historic CAP treatments and to obtain data regarding the antimicrobial efficacy of a historical high-frequency plasma device. Methods: First, historic literature regarding the history of CAP treatment was evaluated, because in the modern literature no data were available. Second, the susceptibility of 5 different bacterial wound isolates, cultured on agar, to a historic plasma source (violet wand [VW]) and two modern devices (atmospheric pressure plasma jet [APPJ] and Dielectric Barrier Discharge [DBD]) was analyzed . The obtained inhibition areas (IA) were compared. Results: First, the most convenient popular historical electromedical treatments produced a so-called effluvia by using glass electrodes, related to today’s CAP. Second, all three tested plasma sources showed complete eradication of all tested microbial strains in the treated area. The “historical” cold VW plasma showed antimicrobial effects similar to those of modern APPJ and DBD regarding the diameter of the IA. Conclusion: Some retrograde evidence may be deducted from this, especially for treatment of infectious diseases with historical plasma devices. The underlying technology may serve as model for construction of modern sucessive devices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4459170 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | German Medical Science GMS Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44591702015-06-29 On the history of plasma treatment and comparison of microbiostatic efficacy of a historical high-frequency plasma device with two modern devices Napp, Judith Daeschlein, Georg Napp, Matthias von Podewils, Sebastian Gümbel, Denis Spitzmueller, Romy Fornaciari, Paolo Hinz, Peter Jünger, Michael GMS Hyg Infect Control Article Background: Cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) with its many bioactive properties has defined a new medical field: the plasma medicine. However, in the related form of high-frequency therapy, CAP was even used briefly a century ago. The aim of this study was to review historic CAP treatments and to obtain data regarding the antimicrobial efficacy of a historical high-frequency plasma device. Methods: First, historic literature regarding the history of CAP treatment was evaluated, because in the modern literature no data were available. Second, the susceptibility of 5 different bacterial wound isolates, cultured on agar, to a historic plasma source (violet wand [VW]) and two modern devices (atmospheric pressure plasma jet [APPJ] and Dielectric Barrier Discharge [DBD]) was analyzed . The obtained inhibition areas (IA) were compared. Results: First, the most convenient popular historical electromedical treatments produced a so-called effluvia by using glass electrodes, related to today’s CAP. Second, all three tested plasma sources showed complete eradication of all tested microbial strains in the treated area. The “historical” cold VW plasma showed antimicrobial effects similar to those of modern APPJ and DBD regarding the diameter of the IA. Conclusion: Some retrograde evidence may be deducted from this, especially for treatment of infectious diseases with historical plasma devices. The underlying technology may serve as model for construction of modern sucessive devices. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2015-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4459170/ /pubmed/26124985 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000251 Text en Copyright © 2015 Napp et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. |
spellingShingle | Article Napp, Judith Daeschlein, Georg Napp, Matthias von Podewils, Sebastian Gümbel, Denis Spitzmueller, Romy Fornaciari, Paolo Hinz, Peter Jünger, Michael On the history of plasma treatment and comparison of microbiostatic efficacy of a historical high-frequency plasma device with two modern devices |
title | On the history of plasma treatment and comparison of microbiostatic efficacy of a historical high-frequency plasma device with two modern devices |
title_full | On the history of plasma treatment and comparison of microbiostatic efficacy of a historical high-frequency plasma device with two modern devices |
title_fullStr | On the history of plasma treatment and comparison of microbiostatic efficacy of a historical high-frequency plasma device with two modern devices |
title_full_unstemmed | On the history of plasma treatment and comparison of microbiostatic efficacy of a historical high-frequency plasma device with two modern devices |
title_short | On the history of plasma treatment and comparison of microbiostatic efficacy of a historical high-frequency plasma device with two modern devices |
title_sort | on the history of plasma treatment and comparison of microbiostatic efficacy of a historical high-frequency plasma device with two modern devices |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4459170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26124985 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000251 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nappjudith onthehistoryofplasmatreatmentandcomparisonofmicrobiostaticefficacyofahistoricalhighfrequencyplasmadevicewithtwomoderndevices AT daeschleingeorg onthehistoryofplasmatreatmentandcomparisonofmicrobiostaticefficacyofahistoricalhighfrequencyplasmadevicewithtwomoderndevices AT nappmatthias onthehistoryofplasmatreatmentandcomparisonofmicrobiostaticefficacyofahistoricalhighfrequencyplasmadevicewithtwomoderndevices AT vonpodewilssebastian onthehistoryofplasmatreatmentandcomparisonofmicrobiostaticefficacyofahistoricalhighfrequencyplasmadevicewithtwomoderndevices AT gumbeldenis onthehistoryofplasmatreatmentandcomparisonofmicrobiostaticefficacyofahistoricalhighfrequencyplasmadevicewithtwomoderndevices AT spitzmuellerromy onthehistoryofplasmatreatmentandcomparisonofmicrobiostaticefficacyofahistoricalhighfrequencyplasmadevicewithtwomoderndevices AT fornaciaripaolo onthehistoryofplasmatreatmentandcomparisonofmicrobiostaticefficacyofahistoricalhighfrequencyplasmadevicewithtwomoderndevices AT hinzpeter onthehistoryofplasmatreatmentandcomparisonofmicrobiostaticefficacyofahistoricalhighfrequencyplasmadevicewithtwomoderndevices AT jungermichael onthehistoryofplasmatreatmentandcomparisonofmicrobiostaticefficacyofahistoricalhighfrequencyplasmadevicewithtwomoderndevices |