Cargando…

On the history of plasma treatment and comparison of microbiostatic efficacy of a historical high-frequency plasma device with two modern devices

Background: Cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) with its many bioactive properties has defined a new medical field: the plasma medicine. However, in the related form of high-frequency therapy, CAP was even used briefly a century ago. The aim of this study was to review historic CAP treatments and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Napp, Judith, Daeschlein, Georg, Napp, Matthias, von Podewils, Sebastian, Gümbel, Denis, Spitzmueller, Romy, Fornaciari, Paolo, Hinz, Peter, Jünger, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4459170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26124985
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000251
_version_ 1782375180289441792
author Napp, Judith
Daeschlein, Georg
Napp, Matthias
von Podewils, Sebastian
Gümbel, Denis
Spitzmueller, Romy
Fornaciari, Paolo
Hinz, Peter
Jünger, Michael
author_facet Napp, Judith
Daeschlein, Georg
Napp, Matthias
von Podewils, Sebastian
Gümbel, Denis
Spitzmueller, Romy
Fornaciari, Paolo
Hinz, Peter
Jünger, Michael
author_sort Napp, Judith
collection PubMed
description Background: Cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) with its many bioactive properties has defined a new medical field: the plasma medicine. However, in the related form of high-frequency therapy, CAP was even used briefly a century ago. The aim of this study was to review historic CAP treatments and to obtain data regarding the antimicrobial efficacy of a historical high-frequency plasma device. Methods: First, historic literature regarding the history of CAP treatment was evaluated, because in the modern literature no data were available. Second, the susceptibility of 5 different bacterial wound isolates, cultured on agar, to a historic plasma source (violet wand [VW]) and two modern devices (atmospheric pressure plasma jet [APPJ] and Dielectric Barrier Discharge [DBD]) was analyzed . The obtained inhibition areas (IA) were compared. Results: First, the most convenient popular historical electromedical treatments produced a so-called effluvia by using glass electrodes, related to today’s CAP. Second, all three tested plasma sources showed complete eradication of all tested microbial strains in the treated area. The “historical” cold VW plasma showed antimicrobial effects similar to those of modern APPJ and DBD regarding the diameter of the IA. Conclusion: Some retrograde evidence may be deducted from this, especially for treatment of infectious diseases with historical plasma devices. The underlying technology may serve as model for construction of modern sucessive devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4459170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44591702015-06-29 On the history of plasma treatment and comparison of microbiostatic efficacy of a historical high-frequency plasma device with two modern devices Napp, Judith Daeschlein, Georg Napp, Matthias von Podewils, Sebastian Gümbel, Denis Spitzmueller, Romy Fornaciari, Paolo Hinz, Peter Jünger, Michael GMS Hyg Infect Control Article Background: Cold atmospheric pressure plasma (CAP) with its many bioactive properties has defined a new medical field: the plasma medicine. However, in the related form of high-frequency therapy, CAP was even used briefly a century ago. The aim of this study was to review historic CAP treatments and to obtain data regarding the antimicrobial efficacy of a historical high-frequency plasma device. Methods: First, historic literature regarding the history of CAP treatment was evaluated, because in the modern literature no data were available. Second, the susceptibility of 5 different bacterial wound isolates, cultured on agar, to a historic plasma source (violet wand [VW]) and two modern devices (atmospheric pressure plasma jet [APPJ] and Dielectric Barrier Discharge [DBD]) was analyzed . The obtained inhibition areas (IA) were compared. Results: First, the most convenient popular historical electromedical treatments produced a so-called effluvia by using glass electrodes, related to today’s CAP. Second, all three tested plasma sources showed complete eradication of all tested microbial strains in the treated area. The “historical” cold VW plasma showed antimicrobial effects similar to those of modern APPJ and DBD regarding the diameter of the IA. Conclusion: Some retrograde evidence may be deducted from this, especially for treatment of infectious diseases with historical plasma devices. The underlying technology may serve as model for construction of modern sucessive devices. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2015-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4459170/ /pubmed/26124985 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000251 Text en Copyright © 2015 Napp et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Article
Napp, Judith
Daeschlein, Georg
Napp, Matthias
von Podewils, Sebastian
Gümbel, Denis
Spitzmueller, Romy
Fornaciari, Paolo
Hinz, Peter
Jünger, Michael
On the history of plasma treatment and comparison of microbiostatic efficacy of a historical high-frequency plasma device with two modern devices
title On the history of plasma treatment and comparison of microbiostatic efficacy of a historical high-frequency plasma device with two modern devices
title_full On the history of plasma treatment and comparison of microbiostatic efficacy of a historical high-frequency plasma device with two modern devices
title_fullStr On the history of plasma treatment and comparison of microbiostatic efficacy of a historical high-frequency plasma device with two modern devices
title_full_unstemmed On the history of plasma treatment and comparison of microbiostatic efficacy of a historical high-frequency plasma device with two modern devices
title_short On the history of plasma treatment and comparison of microbiostatic efficacy of a historical high-frequency plasma device with two modern devices
title_sort on the history of plasma treatment and comparison of microbiostatic efficacy of a historical high-frequency plasma device with two modern devices
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4459170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26124985
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000251
work_keys_str_mv AT nappjudith onthehistoryofplasmatreatmentandcomparisonofmicrobiostaticefficacyofahistoricalhighfrequencyplasmadevicewithtwomoderndevices
AT daeschleingeorg onthehistoryofplasmatreatmentandcomparisonofmicrobiostaticefficacyofahistoricalhighfrequencyplasmadevicewithtwomoderndevices
AT nappmatthias onthehistoryofplasmatreatmentandcomparisonofmicrobiostaticefficacyofahistoricalhighfrequencyplasmadevicewithtwomoderndevices
AT vonpodewilssebastian onthehistoryofplasmatreatmentandcomparisonofmicrobiostaticefficacyofahistoricalhighfrequencyplasmadevicewithtwomoderndevices
AT gumbeldenis onthehistoryofplasmatreatmentandcomparisonofmicrobiostaticefficacyofahistoricalhighfrequencyplasmadevicewithtwomoderndevices
AT spitzmuellerromy onthehistoryofplasmatreatmentandcomparisonofmicrobiostaticefficacyofahistoricalhighfrequencyplasmadevicewithtwomoderndevices
AT fornaciaripaolo onthehistoryofplasmatreatmentandcomparisonofmicrobiostaticefficacyofahistoricalhighfrequencyplasmadevicewithtwomoderndevices
AT hinzpeter onthehistoryofplasmatreatmentandcomparisonofmicrobiostaticefficacyofahistoricalhighfrequencyplasmadevicewithtwomoderndevices
AT jungermichael onthehistoryofplasmatreatmentandcomparisonofmicrobiostaticefficacyofahistoricalhighfrequencyplasmadevicewithtwomoderndevices