Cargando…

Randomized trial comparing episiotomies with Braun-Stadler episiotomy scissors and EPISCISSORS-60(®)

INTRODUCTION: Episiotomy angle is a crucial factor in causation of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS), which are the major cause of female bowel incontinence. Sutured episiotomies angled too close to the midline (<30 degree) or too far away from the midline (>60 degree) fail to unload t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sawant, Ganpat, Kumar, Divya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4459625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26082666
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S83360
_version_ 1782375247783133184
author Sawant, Ganpat
Kumar, Divya
author_facet Sawant, Ganpat
Kumar, Divya
author_sort Sawant, Ganpat
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Episiotomy angle is a crucial factor in causation of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS), which are the major cause of female bowel incontinence. Sutured episiotomies angled too close to the midline (<30 degree) or too far away from the midline (>60 degree) fail to unload the perineum sufficiently and predispose to OASIS. A 25-degree post-delivery episiotomy suture angle has a 10% risk of OASIS while 45-degree episiotomy is associated with 0.5% risk. To account for perineal distension at crowning, a 60-degree episiotomy incision is required to achieve 43–50 degree suture angles. We compared episiotomy suture angles with commonly used Braun-Stadler episiotomy scissors with the new fixed angle EPISCISSORS-60(®). METHODS: Ethical approval was obtained. A prospective cluster randomization design was chosen. Thirty-one patients were required in each group for a 12-degree difference with power at 90% and 5% significance. Sutured episiotomy angles and post-delivery linear distance from caudal end of the sutured episiotomy to the anus were measured with protractors and rulers. Two-tailed t-tests were used to compare the two groups. RESULTS: Thirty-one nulliparae had episiotomies with EPISCISSORS-60(®), 32 with Braun-Stadler. Mean age (25 versus 24.8 years) was similar. EPISCISSORS-60(®) episiotomies were angled 12 degrees more laterally away from the anus compared to Braun-Stadler (40.6 degrees, 95% confidence interval [CI] ±2, interquartile range [IQR] 35–45 versus 28.3 degrees, 95% CI ±2, IQR 25–30, P<0.0001). The post-delivery linear distance from caudal end of the sutured episiotomy to the anus was 15 mm more with the EPISCISSORS-60(®) compared to Braun-Stadler (35 mm, 95% CI ±2.2, IQR =30–39 versus 19.5; 95% CI ±1.3, IQR =14.75–22.25 P<0.0001). EPISCISSORS-60(®) episiotomies measured longer (47 mm versus 40 mm, P<0.0001). There were no OASIS cases in the EPISCISSORS-60(®) group versus one in the Braun-Stadler group. CONCLUSION: The EPISCISSORS-60(®) sutured episiotomies are much further away from the midline in angular and distance measures, hence at lower OASIS risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4459625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44596252015-06-16 Randomized trial comparing episiotomies with Braun-Stadler episiotomy scissors and EPISCISSORS-60(®) Sawant, Ganpat Kumar, Divya Med Devices (Auckl) Original Research INTRODUCTION: Episiotomy angle is a crucial factor in causation of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS), which are the major cause of female bowel incontinence. Sutured episiotomies angled too close to the midline (<30 degree) or too far away from the midline (>60 degree) fail to unload the perineum sufficiently and predispose to OASIS. A 25-degree post-delivery episiotomy suture angle has a 10% risk of OASIS while 45-degree episiotomy is associated with 0.5% risk. To account for perineal distension at crowning, a 60-degree episiotomy incision is required to achieve 43–50 degree suture angles. We compared episiotomy suture angles with commonly used Braun-Stadler episiotomy scissors with the new fixed angle EPISCISSORS-60(®). METHODS: Ethical approval was obtained. A prospective cluster randomization design was chosen. Thirty-one patients were required in each group for a 12-degree difference with power at 90% and 5% significance. Sutured episiotomy angles and post-delivery linear distance from caudal end of the sutured episiotomy to the anus were measured with protractors and rulers. Two-tailed t-tests were used to compare the two groups. RESULTS: Thirty-one nulliparae had episiotomies with EPISCISSORS-60(®), 32 with Braun-Stadler. Mean age (25 versus 24.8 years) was similar. EPISCISSORS-60(®) episiotomies were angled 12 degrees more laterally away from the anus compared to Braun-Stadler (40.6 degrees, 95% confidence interval [CI] ±2, interquartile range [IQR] 35–45 versus 28.3 degrees, 95% CI ±2, IQR 25–30, P<0.0001). The post-delivery linear distance from caudal end of the sutured episiotomy to the anus was 15 mm more with the EPISCISSORS-60(®) compared to Braun-Stadler (35 mm, 95% CI ±2.2, IQR =30–39 versus 19.5; 95% CI ±1.3, IQR =14.75–22.25 P<0.0001). EPISCISSORS-60(®) episiotomies measured longer (47 mm versus 40 mm, P<0.0001). There were no OASIS cases in the EPISCISSORS-60(®) group versus one in the Braun-Stadler group. CONCLUSION: The EPISCISSORS-60(®) sutured episiotomies are much further away from the midline in angular and distance measures, hence at lower OASIS risk. Dove Medical Press 2015-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4459625/ /pubmed/26082666 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S83360 Text en © 2015 Sawant and Kumar. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sawant, Ganpat
Kumar, Divya
Randomized trial comparing episiotomies with Braun-Stadler episiotomy scissors and EPISCISSORS-60(®)
title Randomized trial comparing episiotomies with Braun-Stadler episiotomy scissors and EPISCISSORS-60(®)
title_full Randomized trial comparing episiotomies with Braun-Stadler episiotomy scissors and EPISCISSORS-60(®)
title_fullStr Randomized trial comparing episiotomies with Braun-Stadler episiotomy scissors and EPISCISSORS-60(®)
title_full_unstemmed Randomized trial comparing episiotomies with Braun-Stadler episiotomy scissors and EPISCISSORS-60(®)
title_short Randomized trial comparing episiotomies with Braun-Stadler episiotomy scissors and EPISCISSORS-60(®)
title_sort randomized trial comparing episiotomies with braun-stadler episiotomy scissors and episcissors-60(®)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4459625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26082666
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S83360
work_keys_str_mv AT sawantganpat randomizedtrialcomparingepisiotomieswithbraunstadlerepisiotomyscissorsandepiscissors60
AT kumardivya randomizedtrialcomparingepisiotomieswithbraunstadlerepisiotomyscissorsandepiscissors60