Cargando…

Disability Grant: a precarious lifeline for HIV/AIDS patients in South Africa

BACKGROUND: In South Africa, HIV/AIDS remains a major public health problem. In a context of chronic unemployment and deepening poverty, social assistance through a Disability Grant (DG) is extended to adults with HIV/AIDS who are unable to work because of a mental or physical disability. Using a mi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Govender, Veloshnee, Fried, Jana, Birch, Stephen, Chimbindi, Natsayi, Cleary, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4459666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26050715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0870-8
_version_ 1782375253188542464
author Govender, Veloshnee
Fried, Jana
Birch, Stephen
Chimbindi, Natsayi
Cleary, Susan
author_facet Govender, Veloshnee
Fried, Jana
Birch, Stephen
Chimbindi, Natsayi
Cleary, Susan
author_sort Govender, Veloshnee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In South Africa, HIV/AIDS remains a major public health problem. In a context of chronic unemployment and deepening poverty, social assistance through a Disability Grant (DG) is extended to adults with HIV/AIDS who are unable to work because of a mental or physical disability. Using a mixed methods approach, we consider 1) inequalities in access to the DG for patients on ART and 2) implications of DG access for on-going access to healthcare. METHODS: Data were collected in exit interviews with 1200 ART patients in two rural and two urban health sub-districts in four different South African provinces. Additionally, 17 and 18 in-depth interviews were completed with patients on ART treatment and ART providers, respectively, in three of the four sites included in the quantitative phase. RESULTS: Grant recipients were comparatively worse off than non-recipients in terms of employment (9.1 % vs. 29.9 %) and wealth (58.3 % in the poorest half vs. 45.8 %). After controlling for socioeconomic and demographic factors, site, treatment duration, adherence and concomitant TB treatment, the regression analyses showed that the employed were significantly less likely to receive the DG than the unemployed (p < 0.001). Also, patients who were longer on treatment and receiving concomitant treatment (i.e., ART and tuberculosis care) were more likely to receive the DG (significant at the 5 % level). The qualitative analyses indicated that the DG alleviated the burden of healthcare related costs for ART patients. Both patients and healthcare providers spoke of the complexity of the grants process and eligibility criteria as a barrier to accessing the grant. This impacted adversely on patient-provider relationships. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the appropriateness of the DG for people living with HIV/AIDS. However, improved collaboration between the Departments of Social Development and Health is essential for preparing healthcare providers who are at the interface between social security and potential recipients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0870-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4459666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44596662015-06-09 Disability Grant: a precarious lifeline for HIV/AIDS patients in South Africa Govender, Veloshnee Fried, Jana Birch, Stephen Chimbindi, Natsayi Cleary, Susan BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: In South Africa, HIV/AIDS remains a major public health problem. In a context of chronic unemployment and deepening poverty, social assistance through a Disability Grant (DG) is extended to adults with HIV/AIDS who are unable to work because of a mental or physical disability. Using a mixed methods approach, we consider 1) inequalities in access to the DG for patients on ART and 2) implications of DG access for on-going access to healthcare. METHODS: Data were collected in exit interviews with 1200 ART patients in two rural and two urban health sub-districts in four different South African provinces. Additionally, 17 and 18 in-depth interviews were completed with patients on ART treatment and ART providers, respectively, in three of the four sites included in the quantitative phase. RESULTS: Grant recipients were comparatively worse off than non-recipients in terms of employment (9.1 % vs. 29.9 %) and wealth (58.3 % in the poorest half vs. 45.8 %). After controlling for socioeconomic and demographic factors, site, treatment duration, adherence and concomitant TB treatment, the regression analyses showed that the employed were significantly less likely to receive the DG than the unemployed (p < 0.001). Also, patients who were longer on treatment and receiving concomitant treatment (i.e., ART and tuberculosis care) were more likely to receive the DG (significant at the 5 % level). The qualitative analyses indicated that the DG alleviated the burden of healthcare related costs for ART patients. Both patients and healthcare providers spoke of the complexity of the grants process and eligibility criteria as a barrier to accessing the grant. This impacted adversely on patient-provider relationships. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the appropriateness of the DG for people living with HIV/AIDS. However, improved collaboration between the Departments of Social Development and Health is essential for preparing healthcare providers who are at the interface between social security and potential recipients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0870-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4459666/ /pubmed/26050715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0870-8 Text en © Govender et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Govender, Veloshnee
Fried, Jana
Birch, Stephen
Chimbindi, Natsayi
Cleary, Susan
Disability Grant: a precarious lifeline for HIV/AIDS patients in South Africa
title Disability Grant: a precarious lifeline for HIV/AIDS patients in South Africa
title_full Disability Grant: a precarious lifeline for HIV/AIDS patients in South Africa
title_fullStr Disability Grant: a precarious lifeline for HIV/AIDS patients in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Disability Grant: a precarious lifeline for HIV/AIDS patients in South Africa
title_short Disability Grant: a precarious lifeline for HIV/AIDS patients in South Africa
title_sort disability grant: a precarious lifeline for hiv/aids patients in south africa
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4459666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26050715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0870-8
work_keys_str_mv AT govenderveloshnee disabilitygrantaprecariouslifelineforhivaidspatientsinsouthafrica
AT friedjana disabilitygrantaprecariouslifelineforhivaidspatientsinsouthafrica
AT birchstephen disabilitygrantaprecariouslifelineforhivaidspatientsinsouthafrica
AT chimbindinatsayi disabilitygrantaprecariouslifelineforhivaidspatientsinsouthafrica
AT clearysusan disabilitygrantaprecariouslifelineforhivaidspatientsinsouthafrica