Cargando…

Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Procalcitonin Test for Prodromal Meningococcal Disease–A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Despite vaccines and improved medical intensive care, clinicians must continue to be vigilant of possible Meningococcal Disease in children. The objective was to establish if the procalcitonin test was a cost-effective adjunct for prodromal Meningococcal Disease in children presenting at...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bell, Jennifer M., Shields, Michael D., Agus, Ashley, Dunlop, Kathryn, Bourke, Thomas, Kee, Frank, Lynn, Fiona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4459795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26053385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128993
_version_ 1782375271118143488
author Bell, Jennifer M.
Shields, Michael D.
Agus, Ashley
Dunlop, Kathryn
Bourke, Thomas
Kee, Frank
Lynn, Fiona
author_facet Bell, Jennifer M.
Shields, Michael D.
Agus, Ashley
Dunlop, Kathryn
Bourke, Thomas
Kee, Frank
Lynn, Fiona
author_sort Bell, Jennifer M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite vaccines and improved medical intensive care, clinicians must continue to be vigilant of possible Meningococcal Disease in children. The objective was to establish if the procalcitonin test was a cost-effective adjunct for prodromal Meningococcal Disease in children presenting at emergency department with fever without source. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Data to evaluate procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white cell count tests as indicators of Meningococcal Disease were collected from six independent studies identified through a systematic literature search, applying PRISMA guidelines. The data included 881 children with fever without source in developed countries.The optimal cut-off value for the procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white cell count tests, each as an indicator of Meningococcal Disease, was determined. Summary Receiver Operator Curve analysis determined the overall diagnostic performance of each test with 95% confidence intervals. A decision analytic model was designed to reflect realistic clinical pathways for a child presenting with fever without source by comparing two diagnostic strategies: standard testing using combined C-reactive protein and white cell count tests compared to standard testing plus procalcitonin test. The costs of each of the four diagnosis groups (true positive, false negative, true negative and false positive) were assessed from a National Health Service payer perspective. The procalcitonin test was more accurate (sensitivity=0.89, 95%CI=0.76-0.96; specificity=0.74, 95%CI=0.4-0.92) for early Meningococcal Disease compared to standard testing alone (sensitivity=0.47, 95%CI=0.32-0.62; specificity=0.8, 95% CI=0.64-0.9). Decision analytic model outcomes indicated that the incremental cost effectiveness ratio for the base case was £-8,137.25 (US $ -13,371.94) per correctly treated patient. CONCLUSIONS: Procalcitonin plus standard recommended tests, improved the discriminatory ability for fatal Meningococcal Disease and was more cost-effective; it was also a superior biomarker in infants. Further research is recommended for point-of-care procalcitonin testing and Markov modelling to incorporate cost per QALY with a life-time model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4459795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44597952015-06-16 Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Procalcitonin Test for Prodromal Meningococcal Disease–A Meta-Analysis Bell, Jennifer M. Shields, Michael D. Agus, Ashley Dunlop, Kathryn Bourke, Thomas Kee, Frank Lynn, Fiona PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Despite vaccines and improved medical intensive care, clinicians must continue to be vigilant of possible Meningococcal Disease in children. The objective was to establish if the procalcitonin test was a cost-effective adjunct for prodromal Meningococcal Disease in children presenting at emergency department with fever without source. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Data to evaluate procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white cell count tests as indicators of Meningococcal Disease were collected from six independent studies identified through a systematic literature search, applying PRISMA guidelines. The data included 881 children with fever without source in developed countries.The optimal cut-off value for the procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white cell count tests, each as an indicator of Meningococcal Disease, was determined. Summary Receiver Operator Curve analysis determined the overall diagnostic performance of each test with 95% confidence intervals. A decision analytic model was designed to reflect realistic clinical pathways for a child presenting with fever without source by comparing two diagnostic strategies: standard testing using combined C-reactive protein and white cell count tests compared to standard testing plus procalcitonin test. The costs of each of the four diagnosis groups (true positive, false negative, true negative and false positive) were assessed from a National Health Service payer perspective. The procalcitonin test was more accurate (sensitivity=0.89, 95%CI=0.76-0.96; specificity=0.74, 95%CI=0.4-0.92) for early Meningococcal Disease compared to standard testing alone (sensitivity=0.47, 95%CI=0.32-0.62; specificity=0.8, 95% CI=0.64-0.9). Decision analytic model outcomes indicated that the incremental cost effectiveness ratio for the base case was £-8,137.25 (US $ -13,371.94) per correctly treated patient. CONCLUSIONS: Procalcitonin plus standard recommended tests, improved the discriminatory ability for fatal Meningococcal Disease and was more cost-effective; it was also a superior biomarker in infants. Further research is recommended for point-of-care procalcitonin testing and Markov modelling to incorporate cost per QALY with a life-time model. Public Library of Science 2015-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4459795/ /pubmed/26053385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128993 Text en © 2015 Bell et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bell, Jennifer M.
Shields, Michael D.
Agus, Ashley
Dunlop, Kathryn
Bourke, Thomas
Kee, Frank
Lynn, Fiona
Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Procalcitonin Test for Prodromal Meningococcal Disease–A Meta-Analysis
title Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Procalcitonin Test for Prodromal Meningococcal Disease–A Meta-Analysis
title_full Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Procalcitonin Test for Prodromal Meningococcal Disease–A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Procalcitonin Test for Prodromal Meningococcal Disease–A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Procalcitonin Test for Prodromal Meningococcal Disease–A Meta-Analysis
title_short Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Procalcitonin Test for Prodromal Meningococcal Disease–A Meta-Analysis
title_sort clinical and cost-effectiveness of procalcitonin test for prodromal meningococcal disease–a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4459795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26053385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128993
work_keys_str_mv AT belljenniferm clinicalandcosteffectivenessofprocalcitonintestforprodromalmeningococcaldiseaseametaanalysis
AT shieldsmichaeld clinicalandcosteffectivenessofprocalcitonintestforprodromalmeningococcaldiseaseametaanalysis
AT agusashley clinicalandcosteffectivenessofprocalcitonintestforprodromalmeningococcaldiseaseametaanalysis
AT dunlopkathryn clinicalandcosteffectivenessofprocalcitonintestforprodromalmeningococcaldiseaseametaanalysis
AT bourkethomas clinicalandcosteffectivenessofprocalcitonintestforprodromalmeningococcaldiseaseametaanalysis
AT keefrank clinicalandcosteffectivenessofprocalcitonintestforprodromalmeningococcaldiseaseametaanalysis
AT lynnfiona clinicalandcosteffectivenessofprocalcitonintestforprodromalmeningococcaldiseaseametaanalysis