Cargando…

Revisional Laparoscopic Gastric Pouch Resizing for Inadequate Weight Loss After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

BACKGROUND: Weight regain due to gastric pouch dilatation after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is seen more frequently after long-term follow-up. We studied the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic pouch resizing (LPR) for dilated gastric pouch after RYGB associated with inadequate weight loss. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Bader, Ibtisam, Khoursheed, Mousa, Al Sharaf, Khalid, Mouzannar, D. Ali, Ashraf, Aqeel, Fingerhut, Abe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4460267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25599857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1579-9
_version_ 1782375360755662848
author Al-Bader, Ibtisam
Khoursheed, Mousa
Al Sharaf, Khalid
Mouzannar, D. Ali
Ashraf, Aqeel
Fingerhut, Abe
author_facet Al-Bader, Ibtisam
Khoursheed, Mousa
Al Sharaf, Khalid
Mouzannar, D. Ali
Ashraf, Aqeel
Fingerhut, Abe
author_sort Al-Bader, Ibtisam
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Weight regain due to gastric pouch dilatation after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is seen more frequently after long-term follow-up. We studied the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic pouch resizing (LPR) for dilated gastric pouch after RYGB associated with inadequate weight loss. METHODS: From 1st June 2011 to 1st September 2013, patients who underwent LPR after failed RYGB were retrospectively compared and analyzed. Data included patient demographics, comorbidity, indication for revision, preoperative weight and BMI, operative time, hospital stay, conversion rate, mean follow-up, body mass index (BMI) loss, percentage excess weight loss (%EWL), reoperation rate, morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: Out of 170 revisional bariatric procedures, 32 LPR (27/5, F/M) were performed for dilated gastric pouch after RYGB. The mean age, preoperative weight, and BMI were 38.3 ± 9.3 years, 101.7 ± 22.8 kg, 38.8 ± 6.4 kg/m(2), respectively. The median operative time and hospital stay were 100 min and 2 days, respectively. All pouch resizing procedures were carried out laparoscopically, with none requiring conversion to open surgery. The overall complication and reoperation rates were 15.6 and 3.1 %, respectively. There were no deaths. The mean follow-up was 14.1 ± 6.2 months. The mean postoperative BMI was 32.8 ± 7.3 kg/m(2), and the median %EWL was 29.1 %. CONCLUSIONS: LPR is safe and can lead to adequate weight loss. However, long-term follow-up is needed to determine the efficiency and durability of this procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4460267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44602672015-06-12 Revisional Laparoscopic Gastric Pouch Resizing for Inadequate Weight Loss After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Al-Bader, Ibtisam Khoursheed, Mousa Al Sharaf, Khalid Mouzannar, D. Ali Ashraf, Aqeel Fingerhut, Abe Obes Surg Original Contributions BACKGROUND: Weight regain due to gastric pouch dilatation after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is seen more frequently after long-term follow-up. We studied the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic pouch resizing (LPR) for dilated gastric pouch after RYGB associated with inadequate weight loss. METHODS: From 1st June 2011 to 1st September 2013, patients who underwent LPR after failed RYGB were retrospectively compared and analyzed. Data included patient demographics, comorbidity, indication for revision, preoperative weight and BMI, operative time, hospital stay, conversion rate, mean follow-up, body mass index (BMI) loss, percentage excess weight loss (%EWL), reoperation rate, morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: Out of 170 revisional bariatric procedures, 32 LPR (27/5, F/M) were performed for dilated gastric pouch after RYGB. The mean age, preoperative weight, and BMI were 38.3 ± 9.3 years, 101.7 ± 22.8 kg, 38.8 ± 6.4 kg/m(2), respectively. The median operative time and hospital stay were 100 min and 2 days, respectively. All pouch resizing procedures were carried out laparoscopically, with none requiring conversion to open surgery. The overall complication and reoperation rates were 15.6 and 3.1 %, respectively. There were no deaths. The mean follow-up was 14.1 ± 6.2 months. The mean postoperative BMI was 32.8 ± 7.3 kg/m(2), and the median %EWL was 29.1 %. CONCLUSIONS: LPR is safe and can lead to adequate weight loss. However, long-term follow-up is needed to determine the efficiency and durability of this procedure. Springer US 2015-01-21 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4460267/ /pubmed/25599857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1579-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Contributions
Al-Bader, Ibtisam
Khoursheed, Mousa
Al Sharaf, Khalid
Mouzannar, D. Ali
Ashraf, Aqeel
Fingerhut, Abe
Revisional Laparoscopic Gastric Pouch Resizing for Inadequate Weight Loss After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
title Revisional Laparoscopic Gastric Pouch Resizing for Inadequate Weight Loss After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
title_full Revisional Laparoscopic Gastric Pouch Resizing for Inadequate Weight Loss After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
title_fullStr Revisional Laparoscopic Gastric Pouch Resizing for Inadequate Weight Loss After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
title_full_unstemmed Revisional Laparoscopic Gastric Pouch Resizing for Inadequate Weight Loss After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
title_short Revisional Laparoscopic Gastric Pouch Resizing for Inadequate Weight Loss After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
title_sort revisional laparoscopic gastric pouch resizing for inadequate weight loss after roux-en-y gastric bypass
topic Original Contributions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4460267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25599857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1579-9
work_keys_str_mv AT albaderibtisam revisionallaparoscopicgastricpouchresizingforinadequateweightlossafterrouxenygastricbypass
AT khoursheedmousa revisionallaparoscopicgastricpouchresizingforinadequateweightlossafterrouxenygastricbypass
AT alsharafkhalid revisionallaparoscopicgastricpouchresizingforinadequateweightlossafterrouxenygastricbypass
AT mouzannardali revisionallaparoscopicgastricpouchresizingforinadequateweightlossafterrouxenygastricbypass
AT ashrafaqeel revisionallaparoscopicgastricpouchresizingforinadequateweightlossafterrouxenygastricbypass
AT fingerhutabe revisionallaparoscopicgastricpouchresizingforinadequateweightlossafterrouxenygastricbypass