Cargando…
Artworks as dichotomous objects: implications for the scientific study of aesthetic experience
This paper addresses an issue that has been studied from both scientific and art theoretical perspectives, namely the dichotomous nature of representational artworks. Representational artworks are dichotomous in that they present us with two distinct aspects at once. In one aspect we are aware of wh...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4460548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26106312 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00295 |
_version_ | 1782375388656173056 |
---|---|
author | Pepperell, Robert |
author_facet | Pepperell, Robert |
author_sort | Pepperell, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper addresses an issue that has been studied from both scientific and art theoretical perspectives, namely the dichotomous nature of representational artworks. Representational artworks are dichotomous in that they present us with two distinct aspects at once. In one aspect we are aware of what is represented while in the other we are aware of the material from which the representation is composed. The dichotomy arises due the incompatibility, indeed contradiction, between these aspects of awareness, both of which must be present if we are to fully appreciate the artwork. Examples from art history are given to show how artists have exploited this dichotomy in a way that conditions our response to their work. I hypothesize that the degree of manifest dichotomy in a work determines the strength of its aesthetic effect, and propose this could be experimentally tested. I conclude that scientific studies of aesthetic experience should take the dichotomous nature of artworks into account. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4460548 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44605482015-06-23 Artworks as dichotomous objects: implications for the scientific study of aesthetic experience Pepperell, Robert Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience This paper addresses an issue that has been studied from both scientific and art theoretical perspectives, namely the dichotomous nature of representational artworks. Representational artworks are dichotomous in that they present us with two distinct aspects at once. In one aspect we are aware of what is represented while in the other we are aware of the material from which the representation is composed. The dichotomy arises due the incompatibility, indeed contradiction, between these aspects of awareness, both of which must be present if we are to fully appreciate the artwork. Examples from art history are given to show how artists have exploited this dichotomy in a way that conditions our response to their work. I hypothesize that the degree of manifest dichotomy in a work determines the strength of its aesthetic effect, and propose this could be experimentally tested. I conclude that scientific studies of aesthetic experience should take the dichotomous nature of artworks into account. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4460548/ /pubmed/26106312 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00295 Text en Copyright © 2015 Pepperell. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Pepperell, Robert Artworks as dichotomous objects: implications for the scientific study of aesthetic experience |
title | Artworks as dichotomous objects: implications for the scientific study of aesthetic experience |
title_full | Artworks as dichotomous objects: implications for the scientific study of aesthetic experience |
title_fullStr | Artworks as dichotomous objects: implications for the scientific study of aesthetic experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Artworks as dichotomous objects: implications for the scientific study of aesthetic experience |
title_short | Artworks as dichotomous objects: implications for the scientific study of aesthetic experience |
title_sort | artworks as dichotomous objects: implications for the scientific study of aesthetic experience |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4460548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26106312 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00295 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pepperellrobert artworksasdichotomousobjectsimplicationsforthescientificstudyofaestheticexperience |