Cargando…

Artworks as dichotomous objects: implications for the scientific study of aesthetic experience

This paper addresses an issue that has been studied from both scientific and art theoretical perspectives, namely the dichotomous nature of representational artworks. Representational artworks are dichotomous in that they present us with two distinct aspects at once. In one aspect we are aware of wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Pepperell, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4460548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26106312
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00295
_version_ 1782375388656173056
author Pepperell, Robert
author_facet Pepperell, Robert
author_sort Pepperell, Robert
collection PubMed
description This paper addresses an issue that has been studied from both scientific and art theoretical perspectives, namely the dichotomous nature of representational artworks. Representational artworks are dichotomous in that they present us with two distinct aspects at once. In one aspect we are aware of what is represented while in the other we are aware of the material from which the representation is composed. The dichotomy arises due the incompatibility, indeed contradiction, between these aspects of awareness, both of which must be present if we are to fully appreciate the artwork. Examples from art history are given to show how artists have exploited this dichotomy in a way that conditions our response to their work. I hypothesize that the degree of manifest dichotomy in a work determines the strength of its aesthetic effect, and propose this could be experimentally tested. I conclude that scientific studies of aesthetic experience should take the dichotomous nature of artworks into account.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4460548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44605482015-06-23 Artworks as dichotomous objects: implications for the scientific study of aesthetic experience Pepperell, Robert Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience This paper addresses an issue that has been studied from both scientific and art theoretical perspectives, namely the dichotomous nature of representational artworks. Representational artworks are dichotomous in that they present us with two distinct aspects at once. In one aspect we are aware of what is represented while in the other we are aware of the material from which the representation is composed. The dichotomy arises due the incompatibility, indeed contradiction, between these aspects of awareness, both of which must be present if we are to fully appreciate the artwork. Examples from art history are given to show how artists have exploited this dichotomy in a way that conditions our response to their work. I hypothesize that the degree of manifest dichotomy in a work determines the strength of its aesthetic effect, and propose this could be experimentally tested. I conclude that scientific studies of aesthetic experience should take the dichotomous nature of artworks into account. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4460548/ /pubmed/26106312 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00295 Text en Copyright © 2015 Pepperell. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Pepperell, Robert
Artworks as dichotomous objects: implications for the scientific study of aesthetic experience
title Artworks as dichotomous objects: implications for the scientific study of aesthetic experience
title_full Artworks as dichotomous objects: implications for the scientific study of aesthetic experience
title_fullStr Artworks as dichotomous objects: implications for the scientific study of aesthetic experience
title_full_unstemmed Artworks as dichotomous objects: implications for the scientific study of aesthetic experience
title_short Artworks as dichotomous objects: implications for the scientific study of aesthetic experience
title_sort artworks as dichotomous objects: implications for the scientific study of aesthetic experience
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4460548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26106312
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00295
work_keys_str_mv AT pepperellrobert artworksasdichotomousobjectsimplicationsforthescientificstudyofaestheticexperience