Cargando…
Head Position in Stroke Trial (HeadPoST) – sitting-up vs lying-flat positioning of patients with acute stroke: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Positioning a patient lying-flat in the acute phase of ischaemic stroke may improve recovery and reduce disability, but such a possibility has not been formally tested in a randomised trial. We therefore initiated the Head Position in Stroke Trial (HeadPoST) to determine the effects of l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4460701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26040944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0767-1 |
_version_ | 1782375418123255808 |
---|---|
author | Muñoz-Venturelli, Paula Arima, Hisatomi Lavados, Pablo Brunser, Alejandro Peng, Bin Cui, Liying Song, Lily Billot, Laurent Boaden, Elizabeth Hackett, Maree L. Heritier, Stephane Jan, Stephen Middleton, Sandy Olavarría, Verónica V. Lim, Joyce Y. Lindley, Richard I. Heeley, Emma Robinson, Thompson Pontes-Neto, Octavio Natsagdorj, Lkhamtsoo Lin, Ruey-Tay Watkins, Caroline Anderson, Craig S. |
author_facet | Muñoz-Venturelli, Paula Arima, Hisatomi Lavados, Pablo Brunser, Alejandro Peng, Bin Cui, Liying Song, Lily Billot, Laurent Boaden, Elizabeth Hackett, Maree L. Heritier, Stephane Jan, Stephen Middleton, Sandy Olavarría, Verónica V. Lim, Joyce Y. Lindley, Richard I. Heeley, Emma Robinson, Thompson Pontes-Neto, Octavio Natsagdorj, Lkhamtsoo Lin, Ruey-Tay Watkins, Caroline Anderson, Craig S. |
author_sort | Muñoz-Venturelli, Paula |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Positioning a patient lying-flat in the acute phase of ischaemic stroke may improve recovery and reduce disability, but such a possibility has not been formally tested in a randomised trial. We therefore initiated the Head Position in Stroke Trial (HeadPoST) to determine the effects of lying-flat (0°) compared with sitting-up (≥30°) head positioning in the first 24 hours of hospital admission for patients with acute stroke. METHODS/DESIGN: We plan to conduct an international, cluster randomised, crossover, open, blinded outcome-assessed clinical trial involving 140 study hospitals (clusters) with established acute stroke care programs. Each hospital will be randomly assigned to sequential policies of lying-flat (0°) or sitting-up (≥30°) head position as a ‘business as usual’ stroke care policy during the first 24 hours of admittance. Each hospital is required to recruit 60 consecutive patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), and all patients with acute intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) (an estimated average of 10), in the first randomised head position policy before crossing over to the second head position policy with a similar recruitment target. After collection of in-hospital clinical and management data and 7-day outcomes, central trained blinded assessors will conduct a telephone disability assessment with the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. The primary outcome for analysis is a shift (defined as improvement) in death or disability on this scale. For a cluster size of 60 patients with AIS per intervention and with various assumptions including an intracluster correlation coefficient of 0.03, a sample size of 16,800 patients at 140 centres will provide 90 % power (α 0.05) to detect at least a 16 % relative improvement (shift) in an ordinal logistic regression analysis of the primary outcome. The treatment effect will also be assessed in all patients with ICH who are recruited during each treatment study period. DISCUSSION: HeadPoST is a large international clinical trial in which we will rigorously evaluate the effects of different head positioning in patients with acute stroke. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02162017 (date of registration: 27 April 2014); ANZCTR identifier: ACTRN12614000483651 (date of registration: 9 May 2014). Protocol version and date: version 2.2, 19 June 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0767-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4460701 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44607012015-06-10 Head Position in Stroke Trial (HeadPoST) – sitting-up vs lying-flat positioning of patients with acute stroke: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial Muñoz-Venturelli, Paula Arima, Hisatomi Lavados, Pablo Brunser, Alejandro Peng, Bin Cui, Liying Song, Lily Billot, Laurent Boaden, Elizabeth Hackett, Maree L. Heritier, Stephane Jan, Stephen Middleton, Sandy Olavarría, Verónica V. Lim, Joyce Y. Lindley, Richard I. Heeley, Emma Robinson, Thompson Pontes-Neto, Octavio Natsagdorj, Lkhamtsoo Lin, Ruey-Tay Watkins, Caroline Anderson, Craig S. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Positioning a patient lying-flat in the acute phase of ischaemic stroke may improve recovery and reduce disability, but such a possibility has not been formally tested in a randomised trial. We therefore initiated the Head Position in Stroke Trial (HeadPoST) to determine the effects of lying-flat (0°) compared with sitting-up (≥30°) head positioning in the first 24 hours of hospital admission for patients with acute stroke. METHODS/DESIGN: We plan to conduct an international, cluster randomised, crossover, open, blinded outcome-assessed clinical trial involving 140 study hospitals (clusters) with established acute stroke care programs. Each hospital will be randomly assigned to sequential policies of lying-flat (0°) or sitting-up (≥30°) head position as a ‘business as usual’ stroke care policy during the first 24 hours of admittance. Each hospital is required to recruit 60 consecutive patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS), and all patients with acute intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) (an estimated average of 10), in the first randomised head position policy before crossing over to the second head position policy with a similar recruitment target. After collection of in-hospital clinical and management data and 7-day outcomes, central trained blinded assessors will conduct a telephone disability assessment with the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days. The primary outcome for analysis is a shift (defined as improvement) in death or disability on this scale. For a cluster size of 60 patients with AIS per intervention and with various assumptions including an intracluster correlation coefficient of 0.03, a sample size of 16,800 patients at 140 centres will provide 90 % power (α 0.05) to detect at least a 16 % relative improvement (shift) in an ordinal logistic regression analysis of the primary outcome. The treatment effect will also be assessed in all patients with ICH who are recruited during each treatment study period. DISCUSSION: HeadPoST is a large international clinical trial in which we will rigorously evaluate the effects of different head positioning in patients with acute stroke. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02162017 (date of registration: 27 April 2014); ANZCTR identifier: ACTRN12614000483651 (date of registration: 9 May 2014). Protocol version and date: version 2.2, 19 June 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0767-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4460701/ /pubmed/26040944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0767-1 Text en © Munoz-Venturelli et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Muñoz-Venturelli, Paula Arima, Hisatomi Lavados, Pablo Brunser, Alejandro Peng, Bin Cui, Liying Song, Lily Billot, Laurent Boaden, Elizabeth Hackett, Maree L. Heritier, Stephane Jan, Stephen Middleton, Sandy Olavarría, Verónica V. Lim, Joyce Y. Lindley, Richard I. Heeley, Emma Robinson, Thompson Pontes-Neto, Octavio Natsagdorj, Lkhamtsoo Lin, Ruey-Tay Watkins, Caroline Anderson, Craig S. Head Position in Stroke Trial (HeadPoST) – sitting-up vs lying-flat positioning of patients with acute stroke: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial |
title | Head Position in Stroke Trial (HeadPoST) – sitting-up vs lying-flat positioning of patients with acute stroke: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Head Position in Stroke Trial (HeadPoST) – sitting-up vs lying-flat positioning of patients with acute stroke: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Head Position in Stroke Trial (HeadPoST) – sitting-up vs lying-flat positioning of patients with acute stroke: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Head Position in Stroke Trial (HeadPoST) – sitting-up vs lying-flat positioning of patients with acute stroke: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Head Position in Stroke Trial (HeadPoST) – sitting-up vs lying-flat positioning of patients with acute stroke: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | head position in stroke trial (headpost) – sitting-up vs lying-flat positioning of patients with acute stroke: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4460701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26040944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0767-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT munozventurellipaula headpositioninstroketrialheadpostsittingupvslyingflatpositioningofpatientswithacutestrokestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT arimahisatomi headpositioninstroketrialheadpostsittingupvslyingflatpositioningofpatientswithacutestrokestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lavadospablo headpositioninstroketrialheadpostsittingupvslyingflatpositioningofpatientswithacutestrokestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT brunseralejandro headpositioninstroketrialheadpostsittingupvslyingflatpositioningofpatientswithacutestrokestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT pengbin headpositioninstroketrialheadpostsittingupvslyingflatpositioningofpatientswithacutestrokestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT cuiliying headpositioninstroketrialheadpostsittingupvslyingflatpositioningofpatientswithacutestrokestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT songlily headpositioninstroketrialheadpostsittingupvslyingflatpositioningofpatientswithacutestrokestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT billotlaurent headpositioninstroketrialheadpostsittingupvslyingflatpositioningofpatientswithacutestrokestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT boadenelizabeth headpositioninstroketrialheadpostsittingupvslyingflatpositioningofpatientswithacutestrokestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hackettmareel headpositioninstroketrialheadpostsittingupvslyingflatpositioningofpatientswithacutestrokestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT heritierstephane headpositioninstroketrialheadpostsittingupvslyingflatpositioningofpatientswithacutestrokestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT janstephen headpositioninstroketrialheadpostsittingupvslyingflatpositioningofpatientswithacutestrokestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT middletonsandy headpositioninstroketrialheadpostsittingupvslyingflatpositioningofpatientswithacutestrokestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT olavarriaveronicav headpositioninstroketrialheadpostsittingupvslyingflatpositioningofpatientswithacutestrokestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT limjoycey headpositioninstroketrialheadpostsittingupvslyingflatpositioningofpatientswithacutestrokestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lindleyrichardi headpositioninstroketrialheadpostsittingupvslyingflatpositioningofpatientswithacutestrokestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT heeleyemma headpositioninstroketrialheadpostsittingupvslyingflatpositioningofpatientswithacutestrokestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT robinsonthompson headpositioninstroketrialheadpostsittingupvslyingflatpositioningofpatientswithacutestrokestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT pontesnetooctavio headpositioninstroketrialheadpostsittingupvslyingflatpositioningofpatientswithacutestrokestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT natsagdorjlkhamtsoo headpositioninstroketrialheadpostsittingupvslyingflatpositioningofpatientswithacutestrokestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT linrueytay headpositioninstroketrialheadpostsittingupvslyingflatpositioningofpatientswithacutestrokestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT watkinscaroline headpositioninstroketrialheadpostsittingupvslyingflatpositioningofpatientswithacutestrokestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT andersoncraigs headpositioninstroketrialheadpostsittingupvslyingflatpositioningofpatientswithacutestrokestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT headpositioninstroketrialheadpostsittingupvslyingflatpositioningofpatientswithacutestrokestudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial |