Cargando…

Reliable mortality statistics for Turkey: Are we there yet?

BACKGROUND: The Turkish government has implemented several reforms to improve the Turkish Statistical Institute Death Reporting System (TURKSTAT-DRS) since 2009. However, there has been no assessment to evaluate the impact of these reforms on causes of death statistics. This study attempted to analy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Özdemir, Raziye, Rao, Chalapati, Öcek, Zeliha, Dinç Horasan, Gönül
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4460716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26058703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1904-1
_version_ 1782375421689462784
author Özdemir, Raziye
Rao, Chalapati
Öcek, Zeliha
Dinç Horasan, Gönül
author_facet Özdemir, Raziye
Rao, Chalapati
Öcek, Zeliha
Dinç Horasan, Gönül
author_sort Özdemir, Raziye
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Turkish government has implemented several reforms to improve the Turkish Statistical Institute Death Reporting System (TURKSTAT-DRS) since 2009. However, there has been no assessment to evaluate the impact of these reforms on causes of death statistics. This study attempted to analyse the impact of these reforms on the TURKSTAT-DRS for Turkey, and in the case of Izmir, one of the most developed provinces in Turkey. METHODS: The evaluation framework comprised three main components each with specific criteria. Firstly, data from TURKSTAT for Turkey and Izmir for the periods 2001–2008 and 2009–2013 were assessed in terms of the following dimensions that represent quality of mortality statistics (a. completeness of death registration, b. trends in proportions of deaths with ill-defined causes). Secondly, the quality of information recorded on individual death certificates from Izmir in 2010 was analysed for a. missing information, b. timeliness of death notifications and c. characteristics of deaths with ill-defined causes. Finally, TURKSTAT data were analysed to estimate life tables and summary mortality indicators for Turkey and Izmir, as well as the leading causes-of-death in Turkey in 2013. RESULTS: Registration of adult deaths in Izmir as well as at the national level for Turkey has considerably improved since the introduction of reforms in 2009, along with marked decline in the proportions of deaths assigned ill-defined causes. Death certificates from Izmir indicated significant gaps in recorded information for demographic as well as epidemiological variables, particularly for infant deaths, and in the detailed recording of causes of death. Life expectancy at birth estimated from local data is 3–4 years higher than similar estimates for Turkey from international studies, and this requires further investigation and confirmation. CONCLUSION: The TURKSTAT-DRS is now an improved source of mortality and cause of death statistics for Turkey. The reliability and validity of TURKSTAT data needs to be established through a detailed research program to evaluate completeness of death registration and validity of registered causes of death. Similar evaluation and data analysis of mortality indicators is required at regular intervals at national and sub-national level, to increase confidence in their utility as primary data for epidemiology and health policy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1904-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4460716
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44607162015-06-10 Reliable mortality statistics for Turkey: Are we there yet? Özdemir, Raziye Rao, Chalapati Öcek, Zeliha Dinç Horasan, Gönül BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The Turkish government has implemented several reforms to improve the Turkish Statistical Institute Death Reporting System (TURKSTAT-DRS) since 2009. However, there has been no assessment to evaluate the impact of these reforms on causes of death statistics. This study attempted to analyse the impact of these reforms on the TURKSTAT-DRS for Turkey, and in the case of Izmir, one of the most developed provinces in Turkey. METHODS: The evaluation framework comprised three main components each with specific criteria. Firstly, data from TURKSTAT for Turkey and Izmir for the periods 2001–2008 and 2009–2013 were assessed in terms of the following dimensions that represent quality of mortality statistics (a. completeness of death registration, b. trends in proportions of deaths with ill-defined causes). Secondly, the quality of information recorded on individual death certificates from Izmir in 2010 was analysed for a. missing information, b. timeliness of death notifications and c. characteristics of deaths with ill-defined causes. Finally, TURKSTAT data were analysed to estimate life tables and summary mortality indicators for Turkey and Izmir, as well as the leading causes-of-death in Turkey in 2013. RESULTS: Registration of adult deaths in Izmir as well as at the national level for Turkey has considerably improved since the introduction of reforms in 2009, along with marked decline in the proportions of deaths assigned ill-defined causes. Death certificates from Izmir indicated significant gaps in recorded information for demographic as well as epidemiological variables, particularly for infant deaths, and in the detailed recording of causes of death. Life expectancy at birth estimated from local data is 3–4 years higher than similar estimates for Turkey from international studies, and this requires further investigation and confirmation. CONCLUSION: The TURKSTAT-DRS is now an improved source of mortality and cause of death statistics for Turkey. The reliability and validity of TURKSTAT data needs to be established through a detailed research program to evaluate completeness of death registration and validity of registered causes of death. Similar evaluation and data analysis of mortality indicators is required at regular intervals at national and sub-national level, to increase confidence in their utility as primary data for epidemiology and health policy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1904-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4460716/ /pubmed/26058703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1904-1 Text en © Ozdemir et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Özdemir, Raziye
Rao, Chalapati
Öcek, Zeliha
Dinç Horasan, Gönül
Reliable mortality statistics for Turkey: Are we there yet?
title Reliable mortality statistics for Turkey: Are we there yet?
title_full Reliable mortality statistics for Turkey: Are we there yet?
title_fullStr Reliable mortality statistics for Turkey: Are we there yet?
title_full_unstemmed Reliable mortality statistics for Turkey: Are we there yet?
title_short Reliable mortality statistics for Turkey: Are we there yet?
title_sort reliable mortality statistics for turkey: are we there yet?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4460716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26058703
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1904-1
work_keys_str_mv AT ozdemirraziye reliablemortalitystatisticsforturkeyarewethereyet
AT raochalapati reliablemortalitystatisticsforturkeyarewethereyet
AT ocekzeliha reliablemortalitystatisticsforturkeyarewethereyet
AT dinchorasangonul reliablemortalitystatisticsforturkeyarewethereyet