Cargando…

Memory acquisition and retrieval impact different epigenetic processes that regulate gene expression

BACKGROUND: A fundamental question in neuroscience is how memories are stored and retrieved in the brain. Long-term memory formation requires transcription, translation and epigenetic processes that control gene expression. Thus, characterizing genome-wide the transcriptional changes that occur afte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peixoto, Lucia L, Wimmer, Mathieu E, Poplawski, Shane G, Tudor, Jennifer C, Kenworthy, Charles A, Liu, Shichong, Mizuno, Keiko, Garcia, Benjamin A, Zhang, Nancy R, Giese, K Peter, Abel, Ted
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4460846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26040834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-16-S5-S5
_version_ 1782375444889206784
author Peixoto, Lucia L
Wimmer, Mathieu E
Poplawski, Shane G
Tudor, Jennifer C
Kenworthy, Charles A
Liu, Shichong
Mizuno, Keiko
Garcia, Benjamin A
Zhang, Nancy R
Giese, K Peter
Abel, Ted
author_facet Peixoto, Lucia L
Wimmer, Mathieu E
Poplawski, Shane G
Tudor, Jennifer C
Kenworthy, Charles A
Liu, Shichong
Mizuno, Keiko
Garcia, Benjamin A
Zhang, Nancy R
Giese, K Peter
Abel, Ted
author_sort Peixoto, Lucia L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A fundamental question in neuroscience is how memories are stored and retrieved in the brain. Long-term memory formation requires transcription, translation and epigenetic processes that control gene expression. Thus, characterizing genome-wide the transcriptional changes that occur after memory acquisition and retrieval is of broad interest and importance. Genome-wide technologies are commonly used to interrogate transcriptional changes in discovery-based approaches. Their ability to increase scientific insight beyond traditional candidate gene approaches, however, is usually hindered by batch effects and other sources of unwanted variation, which are particularly hard to control in the study of brain and behavior. RESULTS: We examined genome-wide gene expression after contextual conditioning in the mouse hippocampus, a brain region essential for learning and memory, at all the time-points in which inhibiting transcription has been shown to impair memory formation. We show that most of the variance in gene expression is not due to conditioning and that by removing unwanted variance through additional normalization we are able provide novel biological insights. In particular, we show that genes downregulated by memory acquisition and retrieval impact different functions: chromatin assembly and RNA processing, respectively. Levels of histone 2A variant H2AB are reduced only following acquisition, a finding we confirmed using quantitative proteomics. On the other hand, splicing factor Rbfox1 and NMDA receptor-dependent microRNA miR-219 are only downregulated after retrieval, accompanied by an increase in protein levels of miR-219 target CAMKIIγ. CONCLUSIONS: We provide a thorough characterization of coding and non-coding gene expression during long-term memory formation. We demonstrate that unwanted variance dominates the signal in transcriptional studies of learning and memory and introduce the removal of unwanted variance through normalization as a necessary step for the analysis of genome-wide transcriptional studies in the context of brain and behavior. We show for the first time that histone variants are downregulated after memory acquisition, and splicing factors and microRNAs after memory retrieval. Our results provide mechanistic insights into the molecular basis of cognition by highlighting the differential involvement of epigenetic mechanisms, such as histone variants and post-transcriptional RNA regulation, after acquisition and retrieval of memory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4460846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44608462015-06-29 Memory acquisition and retrieval impact different epigenetic processes that regulate gene expression Peixoto, Lucia L Wimmer, Mathieu E Poplawski, Shane G Tudor, Jennifer C Kenworthy, Charles A Liu, Shichong Mizuno, Keiko Garcia, Benjamin A Zhang, Nancy R Giese, K Peter Abel, Ted BMC Genomics Research BACKGROUND: A fundamental question in neuroscience is how memories are stored and retrieved in the brain. Long-term memory formation requires transcription, translation and epigenetic processes that control gene expression. Thus, characterizing genome-wide the transcriptional changes that occur after memory acquisition and retrieval is of broad interest and importance. Genome-wide technologies are commonly used to interrogate transcriptional changes in discovery-based approaches. Their ability to increase scientific insight beyond traditional candidate gene approaches, however, is usually hindered by batch effects and other sources of unwanted variation, which are particularly hard to control in the study of brain and behavior. RESULTS: We examined genome-wide gene expression after contextual conditioning in the mouse hippocampus, a brain region essential for learning and memory, at all the time-points in which inhibiting transcription has been shown to impair memory formation. We show that most of the variance in gene expression is not due to conditioning and that by removing unwanted variance through additional normalization we are able provide novel biological insights. In particular, we show that genes downregulated by memory acquisition and retrieval impact different functions: chromatin assembly and RNA processing, respectively. Levels of histone 2A variant H2AB are reduced only following acquisition, a finding we confirmed using quantitative proteomics. On the other hand, splicing factor Rbfox1 and NMDA receptor-dependent microRNA miR-219 are only downregulated after retrieval, accompanied by an increase in protein levels of miR-219 target CAMKIIγ. CONCLUSIONS: We provide a thorough characterization of coding and non-coding gene expression during long-term memory formation. We demonstrate that unwanted variance dominates the signal in transcriptional studies of learning and memory and introduce the removal of unwanted variance through normalization as a necessary step for the analysis of genome-wide transcriptional studies in the context of brain and behavior. We show for the first time that histone variants are downregulated after memory acquisition, and splicing factors and microRNAs after memory retrieval. Our results provide mechanistic insights into the molecular basis of cognition by highlighting the differential involvement of epigenetic mechanisms, such as histone variants and post-transcriptional RNA regulation, after acquisition and retrieval of memory. BioMed Central 2015-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4460846/ /pubmed/26040834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-16-S5-S5 Text en Copyright © 2015 Peixoto et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Peixoto, Lucia L
Wimmer, Mathieu E
Poplawski, Shane G
Tudor, Jennifer C
Kenworthy, Charles A
Liu, Shichong
Mizuno, Keiko
Garcia, Benjamin A
Zhang, Nancy R
Giese, K Peter
Abel, Ted
Memory acquisition and retrieval impact different epigenetic processes that regulate gene expression
title Memory acquisition and retrieval impact different epigenetic processes that regulate gene expression
title_full Memory acquisition and retrieval impact different epigenetic processes that regulate gene expression
title_fullStr Memory acquisition and retrieval impact different epigenetic processes that regulate gene expression
title_full_unstemmed Memory acquisition and retrieval impact different epigenetic processes that regulate gene expression
title_short Memory acquisition and retrieval impact different epigenetic processes that regulate gene expression
title_sort memory acquisition and retrieval impact different epigenetic processes that regulate gene expression
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4460846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26040834
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-16-S5-S5
work_keys_str_mv AT peixotolucial memoryacquisitionandretrievalimpactdifferentepigeneticprocessesthatregulategeneexpression
AT wimmermathieue memoryacquisitionandretrievalimpactdifferentepigeneticprocessesthatregulategeneexpression
AT poplawskishaneg memoryacquisitionandretrievalimpactdifferentepigeneticprocessesthatregulategeneexpression
AT tudorjenniferc memoryacquisitionandretrievalimpactdifferentepigeneticprocessesthatregulategeneexpression
AT kenworthycharlesa memoryacquisitionandretrievalimpactdifferentepigeneticprocessesthatregulategeneexpression
AT liushichong memoryacquisitionandretrievalimpactdifferentepigeneticprocessesthatregulategeneexpression
AT mizunokeiko memoryacquisitionandretrievalimpactdifferentepigeneticprocessesthatregulategeneexpression
AT garciabenjamina memoryacquisitionandretrievalimpactdifferentepigeneticprocessesthatregulategeneexpression
AT zhangnancyr memoryacquisitionandretrievalimpactdifferentepigeneticprocessesthatregulategeneexpression
AT giesekpeter memoryacquisitionandretrievalimpactdifferentepigeneticprocessesthatregulategeneexpression
AT abelted memoryacquisitionandretrievalimpactdifferentepigeneticprocessesthatregulategeneexpression