Cargando…

Storage and shipping of tissue samples for DNA analyses: A case study on earthworms()

Nowadays, molecular analyses play an important role in studies of soil dwelling animals, for example in taxonomy, phylogeography or food web analyses. The quality of the DNA, used for later molecular analyses, is an important factor and depends on collection and preservation of samples prior to DNA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Straube, Daniela, Juen, Anita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4461180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26109838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2013.04.001
_version_ 1782375496561983488
author Straube, Daniela
Juen, Anita
author_facet Straube, Daniela
Juen, Anita
author_sort Straube, Daniela
collection PubMed
description Nowadays, molecular analyses play an important role in studies of soil dwelling animals, for example in taxonomy, phylogeography or food web analyses. The quality of the DNA, used for later molecular analyses, is an important factor and depends on collection and preservation of samples prior to DNA extraction. Ideally, DNA samples are frozen immediately upon collection, but if samples are collected in the field, suitable preservation methods might be limited due to unavailability of resources or remote field sites. Moreover, shipping samples over long distances can cause loss of DNA quality e.g. by thawing or leaking of preservation liquid. In this study we use earthworms, a key organism in soil research, to compare three different DNA preservation methods – freezing at −20 °C, storing in 75% ethanol, and freeze drying. Samples were shipped from the United States of America to Austria. The DNA of the samples was extracted using two different extraction methods, peqGOLD™ and Chelex(®) 100. The DNA amplification success was determined by amplifying four DNA fragments of different length. The PCR amplification success is significantly influenced by preservation method and extraction method and differed significantly depending on the length of the DNA fragment. Freeze drying samples was the best preservation method when samples were extracted using the silica based extraction method peqGOLD™. For samples that were extracted with Chelex(®) 100, storage in ethanol was the best preservation method. However, the overall amplification success was significantly lower for the extraction procedure based on Chelex(®) 100. The detection of the small DNA fragments was higher and independent from the extraction method, while the amplification success was significantly reduced for the longer DNA fragments. We recommend freeze drying of DNA samples, especially when they have to be shipped for longer distances. No special packaging or declaration is needed for freeze dried samples, and the risk of thawing is excluded. Storage of freeze dried samples also reduces costs because samples can be kept at room temperature in a desiccator. It should be noted, that the extraction methods showed significant differences in DNA amplification success. Thus, the extraction method should be taken into account when choosing the preservation method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4461180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44611802015-06-22 Storage and shipping of tissue samples for DNA analyses: A case study on earthworms() Straube, Daniela Juen, Anita Eur J Soil Biol Original Article Nowadays, molecular analyses play an important role in studies of soil dwelling animals, for example in taxonomy, phylogeography or food web analyses. The quality of the DNA, used for later molecular analyses, is an important factor and depends on collection and preservation of samples prior to DNA extraction. Ideally, DNA samples are frozen immediately upon collection, but if samples are collected in the field, suitable preservation methods might be limited due to unavailability of resources or remote field sites. Moreover, shipping samples over long distances can cause loss of DNA quality e.g. by thawing or leaking of preservation liquid. In this study we use earthworms, a key organism in soil research, to compare three different DNA preservation methods – freezing at −20 °C, storing in 75% ethanol, and freeze drying. Samples were shipped from the United States of America to Austria. The DNA of the samples was extracted using two different extraction methods, peqGOLD™ and Chelex(®) 100. The DNA amplification success was determined by amplifying four DNA fragments of different length. The PCR amplification success is significantly influenced by preservation method and extraction method and differed significantly depending on the length of the DNA fragment. Freeze drying samples was the best preservation method when samples were extracted using the silica based extraction method peqGOLD™. For samples that were extracted with Chelex(®) 100, storage in ethanol was the best preservation method. However, the overall amplification success was significantly lower for the extraction procedure based on Chelex(®) 100. The detection of the small DNA fragments was higher and independent from the extraction method, while the amplification success was significantly reduced for the longer DNA fragments. We recommend freeze drying of DNA samples, especially when they have to be shipped for longer distances. No special packaging or declaration is needed for freeze dried samples, and the risk of thawing is excluded. Storage of freeze dried samples also reduces costs because samples can be kept at room temperature in a desiccator. It should be noted, that the extraction methods showed significant differences in DNA amplification success. Thus, the extraction method should be taken into account when choosing the preservation method. Elsevier 2013-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4461180/ /pubmed/26109838 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2013.04.001 Text en © 2013 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY NC ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Straube, Daniela
Juen, Anita
Storage and shipping of tissue samples for DNA analyses: A case study on earthworms()
title Storage and shipping of tissue samples for DNA analyses: A case study on earthworms()
title_full Storage and shipping of tissue samples for DNA analyses: A case study on earthworms()
title_fullStr Storage and shipping of tissue samples for DNA analyses: A case study on earthworms()
title_full_unstemmed Storage and shipping of tissue samples for DNA analyses: A case study on earthworms()
title_short Storage and shipping of tissue samples for DNA analyses: A case study on earthworms()
title_sort storage and shipping of tissue samples for dna analyses: a case study on earthworms()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4461180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26109838
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2013.04.001
work_keys_str_mv AT straubedaniela storageandshippingoftissuesamplesfordnaanalysesacasestudyonearthworms
AT juenanita storageandshippingoftissuesamplesfordnaanalysesacasestudyonearthworms