Cargando…

Effects of Spatial Frequency Similarity and Dissimilarity on Contour Integration

We examined the effects of spatial frequency similarity and dissimilarity on human contour integration under various conditions of uncertainty. Participants performed a temporal 2AFC contour detection task. Spatial frequency jitter up to 3.0 octaves was applied either to background elements, or to c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Persike, Malte, Meinhardt, Günter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4461267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26057620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126449
_version_ 1782375507496534016
author Persike, Malte
Meinhardt, Günter
author_facet Persike, Malte
Meinhardt, Günter
author_sort Persike, Malte
collection PubMed
description We examined the effects of spatial frequency similarity and dissimilarity on human contour integration under various conditions of uncertainty. Participants performed a temporal 2AFC contour detection task. Spatial frequency jitter up to 3.0 octaves was applied either to background elements, or to contour and background elements, or to none of both. Results converge on four major findings. (1) Contours defined by spatial frequency similarity alone are only scarcely visible, suggesting the absence of specialized cortical routines for shape detection based on spatial frequency similarity. (2) When orientation collinearity and spatial frequency similarity are combined along a contour, performance amplifies far beyond probability summation when compared to the fully heterogenous condition but only to a margin compatible with probability summation when compared to the fully homogenous case. (3) Psychometric functions are steeper but not shifted for homogenous contours in heterogenous backgrounds indicating an advantageous signal-to-noise ratio. The additional similarity cue therefore not so much improves contour detection performance but primarily reduces observer uncertainty about whether a potential candidate is a contour or just a false positive. (4) Contour integration is a broadband mechanism which is only moderately impaired by spatial frequency dissimilarity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4461267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44612672015-06-16 Effects of Spatial Frequency Similarity and Dissimilarity on Contour Integration Persike, Malte Meinhardt, Günter PLoS One Research Article We examined the effects of spatial frequency similarity and dissimilarity on human contour integration under various conditions of uncertainty. Participants performed a temporal 2AFC contour detection task. Spatial frequency jitter up to 3.0 octaves was applied either to background elements, or to contour and background elements, or to none of both. Results converge on four major findings. (1) Contours defined by spatial frequency similarity alone are only scarcely visible, suggesting the absence of specialized cortical routines for shape detection based on spatial frequency similarity. (2) When orientation collinearity and spatial frequency similarity are combined along a contour, performance amplifies far beyond probability summation when compared to the fully heterogenous condition but only to a margin compatible with probability summation when compared to the fully homogenous case. (3) Psychometric functions are steeper but not shifted for homogenous contours in heterogenous backgrounds indicating an advantageous signal-to-noise ratio. The additional similarity cue therefore not so much improves contour detection performance but primarily reduces observer uncertainty about whether a potential candidate is a contour or just a false positive. (4) Contour integration is a broadband mechanism which is only moderately impaired by spatial frequency dissimilarity. Public Library of Science 2015-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4461267/ /pubmed/26057620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126449 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Persike, Malte
Meinhardt, Günter
Effects of Spatial Frequency Similarity and Dissimilarity on Contour Integration
title Effects of Spatial Frequency Similarity and Dissimilarity on Contour Integration
title_full Effects of Spatial Frequency Similarity and Dissimilarity on Contour Integration
title_fullStr Effects of Spatial Frequency Similarity and Dissimilarity on Contour Integration
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Spatial Frequency Similarity and Dissimilarity on Contour Integration
title_short Effects of Spatial Frequency Similarity and Dissimilarity on Contour Integration
title_sort effects of spatial frequency similarity and dissimilarity on contour integration
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4461267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26057620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126449
work_keys_str_mv AT persikemalte effectsofspatialfrequencysimilarityanddissimilarityoncontourintegration
AT meinhardtgunter effectsofspatialfrequencysimilarityanddissimilarityoncontourintegration