Cargando…
Effects of Spatial Frequency Similarity and Dissimilarity on Contour Integration
We examined the effects of spatial frequency similarity and dissimilarity on human contour integration under various conditions of uncertainty. Participants performed a temporal 2AFC contour detection task. Spatial frequency jitter up to 3.0 octaves was applied either to background elements, or to c...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4461267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26057620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126449 |
_version_ | 1782375507496534016 |
---|---|
author | Persike, Malte Meinhardt, Günter |
author_facet | Persike, Malte Meinhardt, Günter |
author_sort | Persike, Malte |
collection | PubMed |
description | We examined the effects of spatial frequency similarity and dissimilarity on human contour integration under various conditions of uncertainty. Participants performed a temporal 2AFC contour detection task. Spatial frequency jitter up to 3.0 octaves was applied either to background elements, or to contour and background elements, or to none of both. Results converge on four major findings. (1) Contours defined by spatial frequency similarity alone are only scarcely visible, suggesting the absence of specialized cortical routines for shape detection based on spatial frequency similarity. (2) When orientation collinearity and spatial frequency similarity are combined along a contour, performance amplifies far beyond probability summation when compared to the fully heterogenous condition but only to a margin compatible with probability summation when compared to the fully homogenous case. (3) Psychometric functions are steeper but not shifted for homogenous contours in heterogenous backgrounds indicating an advantageous signal-to-noise ratio. The additional similarity cue therefore not so much improves contour detection performance but primarily reduces observer uncertainty about whether a potential candidate is a contour or just a false positive. (4) Contour integration is a broadband mechanism which is only moderately impaired by spatial frequency dissimilarity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4461267 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44612672015-06-16 Effects of Spatial Frequency Similarity and Dissimilarity on Contour Integration Persike, Malte Meinhardt, Günter PLoS One Research Article We examined the effects of spatial frequency similarity and dissimilarity on human contour integration under various conditions of uncertainty. Participants performed a temporal 2AFC contour detection task. Spatial frequency jitter up to 3.0 octaves was applied either to background elements, or to contour and background elements, or to none of both. Results converge on four major findings. (1) Contours defined by spatial frequency similarity alone are only scarcely visible, suggesting the absence of specialized cortical routines for shape detection based on spatial frequency similarity. (2) When orientation collinearity and spatial frequency similarity are combined along a contour, performance amplifies far beyond probability summation when compared to the fully heterogenous condition but only to a margin compatible with probability summation when compared to the fully homogenous case. (3) Psychometric functions are steeper but not shifted for homogenous contours in heterogenous backgrounds indicating an advantageous signal-to-noise ratio. The additional similarity cue therefore not so much improves contour detection performance but primarily reduces observer uncertainty about whether a potential candidate is a contour or just a false positive. (4) Contour integration is a broadband mechanism which is only moderately impaired by spatial frequency dissimilarity. Public Library of Science 2015-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4461267/ /pubmed/26057620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126449 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Persike, Malte Meinhardt, Günter Effects of Spatial Frequency Similarity and Dissimilarity on Contour Integration |
title | Effects of Spatial Frequency Similarity and Dissimilarity on Contour Integration |
title_full | Effects of Spatial Frequency Similarity and Dissimilarity on Contour Integration |
title_fullStr | Effects of Spatial Frequency Similarity and Dissimilarity on Contour Integration |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of Spatial Frequency Similarity and Dissimilarity on Contour Integration |
title_short | Effects of Spatial Frequency Similarity and Dissimilarity on Contour Integration |
title_sort | effects of spatial frequency similarity and dissimilarity on contour integration |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4461267/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26057620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126449 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT persikemalte effectsofspatialfrequencysimilarityanddissimilarityoncontourintegration AT meinhardtgunter effectsofspatialfrequencysimilarityanddissimilarityoncontourintegration |