Cargando…

Evaluation of headache service quality indicators: pilot implementation in two specialist-care centres

BACKGROUND: Evaluating quality of health care is increasingly recognized as an important contributor to the advancement of health-care delivery. We recently developed a set of quality indicators for headache care, intended to be applicable across countries, cultures and settings so that deficiencies...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Katsarava, Zaza, Gouveia, Raquel Gil, Jensen, Rigmor, Gaul, Charly, Schramm, Sara, Schoppe, Anja, Steiner, Timothy J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4461589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26059349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-015-0537-1
_version_ 1782375532986368000
author Katsarava, Zaza
Gouveia, Raquel Gil
Jensen, Rigmor
Gaul, Charly
Schramm, Sara
Schoppe, Anja
Steiner, Timothy J
author_facet Katsarava, Zaza
Gouveia, Raquel Gil
Jensen, Rigmor
Gaul, Charly
Schramm, Sara
Schoppe, Anja
Steiner, Timothy J
author_sort Katsarava, Zaza
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evaluating quality of health care is increasingly recognized as an important contributor to the advancement of health-care delivery. We recently developed a set of quality indicators for headache care, intended to be applicable across countries, cultures and settings so that deficiencies in headache care worldwide might be recognized and rectified. These indicators themselves require evaluation and proof of fitness for purpose. This pilot study begins this process. METHODS: We tested the quality indicators in the tertiary headache centres of the University of Duisburg-Essen in Essen, Germany, and the Hospital da Luz in Lisbon, Portugal. Using seven previously-developed enquiry instruments, we interrogated health-care providers (HCPs), including doctors, nurses, psychologists and physiotherapists, as well as consecutive patients and their medical records. RESULTS: The questionnaires were easily understood by both HCPs and patients and were not unduly time-consuming. The results from the two headache centres were comparable despite their differences in structure, staffing and language. These findings met the purpose of the study. Diagnoses were made according to ICHD criteria and critically evaluated during follow-up. However, diagnostic diaries and instruments assessing burden and response to treatment were not always in place or routinely utilised. Triage systems adjusted waiting times to urgency of need. Treatment plans included pathways to other specialities. Patients felt welcomed, reassured and educated, and were mostly satisfied. Discussion points arose over inclusion of psychological therapies in treatment plans; over recording of outcomes; over indicators of efficiency and equitability (protocols to limit wastage of resources, systems to measure input costs and means of ensuring equal access to the services); and over protocols for reporting serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: This pilot study to assess feasibility of the methods and acceptability of the instruments of headache service quality evaluation was successful. The project is ready to be taken into its next stages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4461589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44615892015-06-15 Evaluation of headache service quality indicators: pilot implementation in two specialist-care centres Katsarava, Zaza Gouveia, Raquel Gil Jensen, Rigmor Gaul, Charly Schramm, Sara Schoppe, Anja Steiner, Timothy J J Headache Pain Research Article BACKGROUND: Evaluating quality of health care is increasingly recognized as an important contributor to the advancement of health-care delivery. We recently developed a set of quality indicators for headache care, intended to be applicable across countries, cultures and settings so that deficiencies in headache care worldwide might be recognized and rectified. These indicators themselves require evaluation and proof of fitness for purpose. This pilot study begins this process. METHODS: We tested the quality indicators in the tertiary headache centres of the University of Duisburg-Essen in Essen, Germany, and the Hospital da Luz in Lisbon, Portugal. Using seven previously-developed enquiry instruments, we interrogated health-care providers (HCPs), including doctors, nurses, psychologists and physiotherapists, as well as consecutive patients and their medical records. RESULTS: The questionnaires were easily understood by both HCPs and patients and were not unduly time-consuming. The results from the two headache centres were comparable despite their differences in structure, staffing and language. These findings met the purpose of the study. Diagnoses were made according to ICHD criteria and critically evaluated during follow-up. However, diagnostic diaries and instruments assessing burden and response to treatment were not always in place or routinely utilised. Triage systems adjusted waiting times to urgency of need. Treatment plans included pathways to other specialities. Patients felt welcomed, reassured and educated, and were mostly satisfied. Discussion points arose over inclusion of psychological therapies in treatment plans; over recording of outcomes; over indicators of efficiency and equitability (protocols to limit wastage of resources, systems to measure input costs and means of ensuring equal access to the services); and over protocols for reporting serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: This pilot study to assess feasibility of the methods and acceptability of the instruments of headache service quality evaluation was successful. The project is ready to be taken into its next stages. Springer Milan 2015-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4461589/ /pubmed/26059349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-015-0537-1 Text en © Katsarava et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Katsarava, Zaza
Gouveia, Raquel Gil
Jensen, Rigmor
Gaul, Charly
Schramm, Sara
Schoppe, Anja
Steiner, Timothy J
Evaluation of headache service quality indicators: pilot implementation in two specialist-care centres
title Evaluation of headache service quality indicators: pilot implementation in two specialist-care centres
title_full Evaluation of headache service quality indicators: pilot implementation in two specialist-care centres
title_fullStr Evaluation of headache service quality indicators: pilot implementation in two specialist-care centres
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of headache service quality indicators: pilot implementation in two specialist-care centres
title_short Evaluation of headache service quality indicators: pilot implementation in two specialist-care centres
title_sort evaluation of headache service quality indicators: pilot implementation in two specialist-care centres
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4461589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26059349
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-015-0537-1
work_keys_str_mv AT katsaravazaza evaluationofheadacheservicequalityindicatorspilotimplementationintwospecialistcarecentres
AT gouveiaraquelgil evaluationofheadacheservicequalityindicatorspilotimplementationintwospecialistcarecentres
AT jensenrigmor evaluationofheadacheservicequalityindicatorspilotimplementationintwospecialistcarecentres
AT gaulcharly evaluationofheadacheservicequalityindicatorspilotimplementationintwospecialistcarecentres
AT schrammsara evaluationofheadacheservicequalityindicatorspilotimplementationintwospecialistcarecentres
AT schoppeanja evaluationofheadacheservicequalityindicatorspilotimplementationintwospecialistcarecentres
AT steinertimothyj evaluationofheadacheservicequalityindicatorspilotimplementationintwospecialistcarecentres