Cargando…
An Open Multicenter Study of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Urolastic, an Injectable Implant for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: One-Year Observation
The prevalence of stress urinary incontinence rises and affects up to 30% of women after 50 years of age. Midurethral slings are currently the mainstay of surgical anti-incontinence therapy. Some patients experience recurrent SUI (RSUI) which is defined as a failure of anti-incontinence surgery afte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4461699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26106616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/851823 |
_version_ | 1782375538460983296 |
---|---|
author | Futyma, Konrad Miotła, Paweł Gałczyński, Krzysztof Baranowski, Włodzimierz Doniec, Jacek Wodzisławska, Agnieszka Jóźwik, Maciej Oniszczuk, Małgorzata Rechberger, Tomasz |
author_facet | Futyma, Konrad Miotła, Paweł Gałczyński, Krzysztof Baranowski, Włodzimierz Doniec, Jacek Wodzisławska, Agnieszka Jóźwik, Maciej Oniszczuk, Małgorzata Rechberger, Tomasz |
author_sort | Futyma, Konrad |
collection | PubMed |
description | The prevalence of stress urinary incontinence rises and affects up to 30% of women after 50 years of age. Midurethral slings are currently the mainstay of surgical anti-incontinence therapy. Some patients experience recurrent SUI (RSUI) which is defined as a failure of anti-incontinence surgery after a period of time or persistence of SUI after the procedure aimed at correcting it. The urethral bulking agent application decreases invasiveness of treatment and meets patients requirements. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and clinical efficacy of Urolastic injection. One hundred and five patients with SUI (including 91 patients with RSUI) were treated with Urolastic in three tertiary gynecological clinics. The efficacy of the procedure was assessed objectively at each follow-up visit by means of cough test and a standard 1-hour pad test. Objective success rate after 12 months after primary procedure in RSUI patients was found in 59.3% of patients. In 14 patients with primary SUI improvement after 1 year was found in 71.4% of patients. Although cure rates after MUS are up to 90% there is still place for less invasive treatment option like periurethral injection of bulking agents, especially in patients with previous SUI surgical management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4461699 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44616992015-06-23 An Open Multicenter Study of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Urolastic, an Injectable Implant for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: One-Year Observation Futyma, Konrad Miotła, Paweł Gałczyński, Krzysztof Baranowski, Włodzimierz Doniec, Jacek Wodzisławska, Agnieszka Jóźwik, Maciej Oniszczuk, Małgorzata Rechberger, Tomasz Biomed Res Int Clinical Study The prevalence of stress urinary incontinence rises and affects up to 30% of women after 50 years of age. Midurethral slings are currently the mainstay of surgical anti-incontinence therapy. Some patients experience recurrent SUI (RSUI) which is defined as a failure of anti-incontinence surgery after a period of time or persistence of SUI after the procedure aimed at correcting it. The urethral bulking agent application decreases invasiveness of treatment and meets patients requirements. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and clinical efficacy of Urolastic injection. One hundred and five patients with SUI (including 91 patients with RSUI) were treated with Urolastic in three tertiary gynecological clinics. The efficacy of the procedure was assessed objectively at each follow-up visit by means of cough test and a standard 1-hour pad test. Objective success rate after 12 months after primary procedure in RSUI patients was found in 59.3% of patients. In 14 patients with primary SUI improvement after 1 year was found in 71.4% of patients. Although cure rates after MUS are up to 90% there is still place for less invasive treatment option like periurethral injection of bulking agents, especially in patients with previous SUI surgical management. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4461699/ /pubmed/26106616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/851823 Text en Copyright © 2015 Konrad Futyma et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Futyma, Konrad Miotła, Paweł Gałczyński, Krzysztof Baranowski, Włodzimierz Doniec, Jacek Wodzisławska, Agnieszka Jóźwik, Maciej Oniszczuk, Małgorzata Rechberger, Tomasz An Open Multicenter Study of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Urolastic, an Injectable Implant for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: One-Year Observation |
title | An Open Multicenter Study of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Urolastic, an Injectable Implant for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: One-Year Observation |
title_full | An Open Multicenter Study of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Urolastic, an Injectable Implant for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: One-Year Observation |
title_fullStr | An Open Multicenter Study of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Urolastic, an Injectable Implant for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: One-Year Observation |
title_full_unstemmed | An Open Multicenter Study of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Urolastic, an Injectable Implant for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: One-Year Observation |
title_short | An Open Multicenter Study of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Urolastic, an Injectable Implant for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: One-Year Observation |
title_sort | open multicenter study of clinical efficacy and safety of urolastic, an injectable implant for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: one-year observation |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4461699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26106616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/851823 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT futymakonrad anopenmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation AT miotłapaweł anopenmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation AT gałczynskikrzysztof anopenmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation AT baranowskiwłodzimierz anopenmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation AT doniecjacek anopenmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation AT wodzisławskaagnieszka anopenmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation AT jozwikmaciej anopenmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation AT oniszczukmałgorzata anopenmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation AT rechbergertomasz anopenmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation AT futymakonrad openmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation AT miotłapaweł openmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation AT gałczynskikrzysztof openmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation AT baranowskiwłodzimierz openmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation AT doniecjacek openmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation AT wodzisławskaagnieszka openmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation AT jozwikmaciej openmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation AT oniszczukmałgorzata openmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation AT rechbergertomasz openmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation |