Cargando…

An Open Multicenter Study of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Urolastic, an Injectable Implant for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: One-Year Observation

The prevalence of stress urinary incontinence rises and affects up to 30% of women after 50 years of age. Midurethral slings are currently the mainstay of surgical anti-incontinence therapy. Some patients experience recurrent SUI (RSUI) which is defined as a failure of anti-incontinence surgery afte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Futyma, Konrad, Miotła, Paweł, Gałczyński, Krzysztof, Baranowski, Włodzimierz, Doniec, Jacek, Wodzisławska, Agnieszka, Jóźwik, Maciej, Oniszczuk, Małgorzata, Rechberger, Tomasz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4461699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26106616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/851823
_version_ 1782375538460983296
author Futyma, Konrad
Miotła, Paweł
Gałczyński, Krzysztof
Baranowski, Włodzimierz
Doniec, Jacek
Wodzisławska, Agnieszka
Jóźwik, Maciej
Oniszczuk, Małgorzata
Rechberger, Tomasz
author_facet Futyma, Konrad
Miotła, Paweł
Gałczyński, Krzysztof
Baranowski, Włodzimierz
Doniec, Jacek
Wodzisławska, Agnieszka
Jóźwik, Maciej
Oniszczuk, Małgorzata
Rechberger, Tomasz
author_sort Futyma, Konrad
collection PubMed
description The prevalence of stress urinary incontinence rises and affects up to 30% of women after 50 years of age. Midurethral slings are currently the mainstay of surgical anti-incontinence therapy. Some patients experience recurrent SUI (RSUI) which is defined as a failure of anti-incontinence surgery after a period of time or persistence of SUI after the procedure aimed at correcting it. The urethral bulking agent application decreases invasiveness of treatment and meets patients requirements. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and clinical efficacy of Urolastic injection. One hundred and five patients with SUI (including 91 patients with RSUI) were treated with Urolastic in three tertiary gynecological clinics. The efficacy of the procedure was assessed objectively at each follow-up visit by means of cough test and a standard 1-hour pad test. Objective success rate after 12 months after primary procedure in RSUI patients was found in 59.3% of patients. In 14 patients with primary SUI improvement after 1 year was found in 71.4% of patients. Although cure rates after MUS are up to 90% there is still place for less invasive treatment option like periurethral injection of bulking agents, especially in patients with previous SUI surgical management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4461699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44616992015-06-23 An Open Multicenter Study of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Urolastic, an Injectable Implant for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: One-Year Observation Futyma, Konrad Miotła, Paweł Gałczyński, Krzysztof Baranowski, Włodzimierz Doniec, Jacek Wodzisławska, Agnieszka Jóźwik, Maciej Oniszczuk, Małgorzata Rechberger, Tomasz Biomed Res Int Clinical Study The prevalence of stress urinary incontinence rises and affects up to 30% of women after 50 years of age. Midurethral slings are currently the mainstay of surgical anti-incontinence therapy. Some patients experience recurrent SUI (RSUI) which is defined as a failure of anti-incontinence surgery after a period of time or persistence of SUI after the procedure aimed at correcting it. The urethral bulking agent application decreases invasiveness of treatment and meets patients requirements. The objective of this study was to assess the safety and clinical efficacy of Urolastic injection. One hundred and five patients with SUI (including 91 patients with RSUI) were treated with Urolastic in three tertiary gynecological clinics. The efficacy of the procedure was assessed objectively at each follow-up visit by means of cough test and a standard 1-hour pad test. Objective success rate after 12 months after primary procedure in RSUI patients was found in 59.3% of patients. In 14 patients with primary SUI improvement after 1 year was found in 71.4% of patients. Although cure rates after MUS are up to 90% there is still place for less invasive treatment option like periurethral injection of bulking agents, especially in patients with previous SUI surgical management. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4461699/ /pubmed/26106616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/851823 Text en Copyright © 2015 Konrad Futyma et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Futyma, Konrad
Miotła, Paweł
Gałczyński, Krzysztof
Baranowski, Włodzimierz
Doniec, Jacek
Wodzisławska, Agnieszka
Jóźwik, Maciej
Oniszczuk, Małgorzata
Rechberger, Tomasz
An Open Multicenter Study of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Urolastic, an Injectable Implant for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: One-Year Observation
title An Open Multicenter Study of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Urolastic, an Injectable Implant for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: One-Year Observation
title_full An Open Multicenter Study of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Urolastic, an Injectable Implant for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: One-Year Observation
title_fullStr An Open Multicenter Study of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Urolastic, an Injectable Implant for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: One-Year Observation
title_full_unstemmed An Open Multicenter Study of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Urolastic, an Injectable Implant for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: One-Year Observation
title_short An Open Multicenter Study of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Urolastic, an Injectable Implant for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: One-Year Observation
title_sort open multicenter study of clinical efficacy and safety of urolastic, an injectable implant for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: one-year observation
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4461699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26106616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/851823
work_keys_str_mv AT futymakonrad anopenmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation
AT miotłapaweł anopenmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation
AT gałczynskikrzysztof anopenmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation
AT baranowskiwłodzimierz anopenmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation
AT doniecjacek anopenmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation
AT wodzisławskaagnieszka anopenmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation
AT jozwikmaciej anopenmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation
AT oniszczukmałgorzata anopenmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation
AT rechbergertomasz anopenmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation
AT futymakonrad openmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation
AT miotłapaweł openmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation
AT gałczynskikrzysztof openmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation
AT baranowskiwłodzimierz openmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation
AT doniecjacek openmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation
AT wodzisławskaagnieszka openmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation
AT jozwikmaciej openmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation
AT oniszczukmałgorzata openmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation
AT rechbergertomasz openmulticenterstudyofclinicalefficacyandsafetyofurolasticaninjectableimplantforthetreatmentofstressurinaryincontinenceoneyearobservation