Cargando…

Prognostic Value of Residual Disease after Interval Debulking Surgery for FIGO Stage IIIC and IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Although complete debulking surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is more often achieved with interval debulking surgery (IDS) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), randomized evidence shows no long-term survival benefit compared to complete primary debulking surgery (PDS). We performed a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rutten, Marianne J., Sonke, Gabe S., Westermann, Anneke M., van Driel, Willemien J., Trum, Johannes W., Kenter, Gemma G., Buist, Marrije R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4461774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26106418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/464123
_version_ 1782375552222494720
author Rutten, Marianne J.
Sonke, Gabe S.
Westermann, Anneke M.
van Driel, Willemien J.
Trum, Johannes W.
Kenter, Gemma G.
Buist, Marrije R.
author_facet Rutten, Marianne J.
Sonke, Gabe S.
Westermann, Anneke M.
van Driel, Willemien J.
Trum, Johannes W.
Kenter, Gemma G.
Buist, Marrije R.
author_sort Rutten, Marianne J.
collection PubMed
description Although complete debulking surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is more often achieved with interval debulking surgery (IDS) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), randomized evidence shows no long-term survival benefit compared to complete primary debulking surgery (PDS). We performed an observational cohort study of patients treated with debulking surgery for advanced EOC to evaluate the prognostic value of residual disease after debulking surgery. All patients treated between 1998 and 2010 in three Dutch referral gynaecological oncology centres were included. The prognostic value of residual disease after surgery for disease specific survival was assessed using Cox-regression analyses. In total, 462 patients underwent NACT-IDS and 227 PDS. Macroscopic residual disease after debulking surgery was an independent prognostic factor for survival in both treatment modalities. Yet, residual tumour less than one centimetre at IDS was associated with a survival benefit of five months compared to leaving residual tumour more than one centimetre, whereas this benefit was not seen after PDS. Leaving residual tumour at IDS is a poor prognostic sign as it is after PDS. The specific prognostic value of residual tumour seems to depend on the clinical setting, as minimal instead of gross residual tumour is associated with improved survival after IDS, but not after PDS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4461774
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44617742015-06-23 Prognostic Value of Residual Disease after Interval Debulking Surgery for FIGO Stage IIIC and IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Rutten, Marianne J. Sonke, Gabe S. Westermann, Anneke M. van Driel, Willemien J. Trum, Johannes W. Kenter, Gemma G. Buist, Marrije R. Obstet Gynecol Int Research Article Although complete debulking surgery for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is more often achieved with interval debulking surgery (IDS) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), randomized evidence shows no long-term survival benefit compared to complete primary debulking surgery (PDS). We performed an observational cohort study of patients treated with debulking surgery for advanced EOC to evaluate the prognostic value of residual disease after debulking surgery. All patients treated between 1998 and 2010 in three Dutch referral gynaecological oncology centres were included. The prognostic value of residual disease after surgery for disease specific survival was assessed using Cox-regression analyses. In total, 462 patients underwent NACT-IDS and 227 PDS. Macroscopic residual disease after debulking surgery was an independent prognostic factor for survival in both treatment modalities. Yet, residual tumour less than one centimetre at IDS was associated with a survival benefit of five months compared to leaving residual tumour more than one centimetre, whereas this benefit was not seen after PDS. Leaving residual tumour at IDS is a poor prognostic sign as it is after PDS. The specific prognostic value of residual tumour seems to depend on the clinical setting, as minimal instead of gross residual tumour is associated with improved survival after IDS, but not after PDS. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4461774/ /pubmed/26106418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/464123 Text en Copyright © 2015 Marianne J. Rutten et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rutten, Marianne J.
Sonke, Gabe S.
Westermann, Anneke M.
van Driel, Willemien J.
Trum, Johannes W.
Kenter, Gemma G.
Buist, Marrije R.
Prognostic Value of Residual Disease after Interval Debulking Surgery for FIGO Stage IIIC and IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
title Prognostic Value of Residual Disease after Interval Debulking Surgery for FIGO Stage IIIC and IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
title_full Prognostic Value of Residual Disease after Interval Debulking Surgery for FIGO Stage IIIC and IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
title_fullStr Prognostic Value of Residual Disease after Interval Debulking Surgery for FIGO Stage IIIC and IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Value of Residual Disease after Interval Debulking Surgery for FIGO Stage IIIC and IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
title_short Prognostic Value of Residual Disease after Interval Debulking Surgery for FIGO Stage IIIC and IV Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
title_sort prognostic value of residual disease after interval debulking surgery for figo stage iiic and iv epithelial ovarian cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4461774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26106418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/464123
work_keys_str_mv AT ruttenmariannej prognosticvalueofresidualdiseaseafterintervaldebulkingsurgeryforfigostageiiicandivepithelialovariancancer
AT sonkegabes prognosticvalueofresidualdiseaseafterintervaldebulkingsurgeryforfigostageiiicandivepithelialovariancancer
AT westermannannekem prognosticvalueofresidualdiseaseafterintervaldebulkingsurgeryforfigostageiiicandivepithelialovariancancer
AT vandrielwillemienj prognosticvalueofresidualdiseaseafterintervaldebulkingsurgeryforfigostageiiicandivepithelialovariancancer
AT trumjohannesw prognosticvalueofresidualdiseaseafterintervaldebulkingsurgeryforfigostageiiicandivepithelialovariancancer
AT kentergemmag prognosticvalueofresidualdiseaseafterintervaldebulkingsurgeryforfigostageiiicandivepithelialovariancancer
AT buistmarrijer prognosticvalueofresidualdiseaseafterintervaldebulkingsurgeryforfigostageiiicandivepithelialovariancancer