Cargando…

Effect of vaginal self-sampling on cervical cancer screening rates: a community-based study in Newfoundland

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is highly preventable and treatable if detected early through regular screening. Women in the Canadian province of Newfoundland & Labrador have relatively low rates of cervical cancer screening, with rates of around 40 % between 2007 and 2009. Persistent infection wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duke, Pauline, Godwin, Marshall, Ratnam, Samuel, Dawson, Lesa, Fontaine, Daniel, Lear, Adrian, Traverso-Yepez, Martha, Graham, Wendy, Ravalia, Mohamad, Mugford, Gerry, Pike, Andrea, Fortier, Jacqueline, Peach, Mandy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4461929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26060041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-015-0206-1
_version_ 1782375577342181376
author Duke, Pauline
Godwin, Marshall
Ratnam, Samuel
Dawson, Lesa
Fontaine, Daniel
Lear, Adrian
Traverso-Yepez, Martha
Graham, Wendy
Ravalia, Mohamad
Mugford, Gerry
Pike, Andrea
Fortier, Jacqueline
Peach, Mandy
author_facet Duke, Pauline
Godwin, Marshall
Ratnam, Samuel
Dawson, Lesa
Fontaine, Daniel
Lear, Adrian
Traverso-Yepez, Martha
Graham, Wendy
Ravalia, Mohamad
Mugford, Gerry
Pike, Andrea
Fortier, Jacqueline
Peach, Mandy
author_sort Duke, Pauline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is highly preventable and treatable if detected early through regular screening. Women in the Canadian province of Newfoundland & Labrador have relatively low rates of cervical cancer screening, with rates of around 40 % between 2007 and 2009. Persistent infection with oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) is a necessary cause for the development of cervical cancer, and HPV testing, including self-sampling, has been suggested as an alternative method of cervical cancer screening that may alleviate some barriers to screening. Our objective was to determine whether offering self-collected HPV testing screening increased cervical cancer screening rates in rural communities. METHODS: During the 2-year study, three community-based cohorts were assigned to receive either i) a cervical cancer education campaign with the option of HPV testing; ii) an educational campaign alone; iii) or no intervention. Self-collection kits were offered to eligible women at family medicine clinics and community centres, and participants were surveyed to determine their acceptance of the HPV self-collection kit. Paired proportions testing for before-after studies was used to determine differences in screening rates from baseline, and Chi Square analysis of three dimensional 2 × 2 × 2 tables compared the change between communities. RESULTS: Cervical cancer screening increased by 15.2 % (p < 0.001) to 67.4 % in the community where self-collection was available, versus a 2.9 % increase (p = 0.07) in the community that received educational campaigns and 8.5 % in the community with no intervention (p = 0.193). The difference in change in rates was statistically significant between communities A and B (p < 0.001) but not between communities A and C (p = 0.193). The response rate was low, with only 9.5 % (168/1760) of eligible women opting to self-collect for HPV testing. Of the women who completed self-collection, 15.5 % (26) had not had a Pap smear in the last 3 years, and 88.7 % reported that they were somewhat or very satisfied with self-collection. CONCLUSIONS: Offering self-collected HPV testing increased the cervical cancer screening rate in a rural NL community. Women who completed self-collection had generally positive feelings about the experience. Offering HPV self-collection may increase screening compliance, particularly among women who do not present for routine Pap smears.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4461929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44619292015-06-11 Effect of vaginal self-sampling on cervical cancer screening rates: a community-based study in Newfoundland Duke, Pauline Godwin, Marshall Ratnam, Samuel Dawson, Lesa Fontaine, Daniel Lear, Adrian Traverso-Yepez, Martha Graham, Wendy Ravalia, Mohamad Mugford, Gerry Pike, Andrea Fortier, Jacqueline Peach, Mandy BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is highly preventable and treatable if detected early through regular screening. Women in the Canadian province of Newfoundland & Labrador have relatively low rates of cervical cancer screening, with rates of around 40 % between 2007 and 2009. Persistent infection with oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) is a necessary cause for the development of cervical cancer, and HPV testing, including self-sampling, has been suggested as an alternative method of cervical cancer screening that may alleviate some barriers to screening. Our objective was to determine whether offering self-collected HPV testing screening increased cervical cancer screening rates in rural communities. METHODS: During the 2-year study, three community-based cohorts were assigned to receive either i) a cervical cancer education campaign with the option of HPV testing; ii) an educational campaign alone; iii) or no intervention. Self-collection kits were offered to eligible women at family medicine clinics and community centres, and participants were surveyed to determine their acceptance of the HPV self-collection kit. Paired proportions testing for before-after studies was used to determine differences in screening rates from baseline, and Chi Square analysis of three dimensional 2 × 2 × 2 tables compared the change between communities. RESULTS: Cervical cancer screening increased by 15.2 % (p < 0.001) to 67.4 % in the community where self-collection was available, versus a 2.9 % increase (p = 0.07) in the community that received educational campaigns and 8.5 % in the community with no intervention (p = 0.193). The difference in change in rates was statistically significant between communities A and B (p < 0.001) but not between communities A and C (p = 0.193). The response rate was low, with only 9.5 % (168/1760) of eligible women opting to self-collect for HPV testing. Of the women who completed self-collection, 15.5 % (26) had not had a Pap smear in the last 3 years, and 88.7 % reported that they were somewhat or very satisfied with self-collection. CONCLUSIONS: Offering self-collected HPV testing increased the cervical cancer screening rate in a rural NL community. Women who completed self-collection had generally positive feelings about the experience. Offering HPV self-collection may increase screening compliance, particularly among women who do not present for routine Pap smears. BioMed Central 2015-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4461929/ /pubmed/26060041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-015-0206-1 Text en © Duke et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Duke, Pauline
Godwin, Marshall
Ratnam, Samuel
Dawson, Lesa
Fontaine, Daniel
Lear, Adrian
Traverso-Yepez, Martha
Graham, Wendy
Ravalia, Mohamad
Mugford, Gerry
Pike, Andrea
Fortier, Jacqueline
Peach, Mandy
Effect of vaginal self-sampling on cervical cancer screening rates: a community-based study in Newfoundland
title Effect of vaginal self-sampling on cervical cancer screening rates: a community-based study in Newfoundland
title_full Effect of vaginal self-sampling on cervical cancer screening rates: a community-based study in Newfoundland
title_fullStr Effect of vaginal self-sampling on cervical cancer screening rates: a community-based study in Newfoundland
title_full_unstemmed Effect of vaginal self-sampling on cervical cancer screening rates: a community-based study in Newfoundland
title_short Effect of vaginal self-sampling on cervical cancer screening rates: a community-based study in Newfoundland
title_sort effect of vaginal self-sampling on cervical cancer screening rates: a community-based study in newfoundland
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4461929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26060041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-015-0206-1
work_keys_str_mv AT dukepauline effectofvaginalselfsamplingoncervicalcancerscreeningratesacommunitybasedstudyinnewfoundland
AT godwinmarshall effectofvaginalselfsamplingoncervicalcancerscreeningratesacommunitybasedstudyinnewfoundland
AT ratnamsamuel effectofvaginalselfsamplingoncervicalcancerscreeningratesacommunitybasedstudyinnewfoundland
AT dawsonlesa effectofvaginalselfsamplingoncervicalcancerscreeningratesacommunitybasedstudyinnewfoundland
AT fontainedaniel effectofvaginalselfsamplingoncervicalcancerscreeningratesacommunitybasedstudyinnewfoundland
AT learadrian effectofvaginalselfsamplingoncervicalcancerscreeningratesacommunitybasedstudyinnewfoundland
AT traversoyepezmartha effectofvaginalselfsamplingoncervicalcancerscreeningratesacommunitybasedstudyinnewfoundland
AT grahamwendy effectofvaginalselfsamplingoncervicalcancerscreeningratesacommunitybasedstudyinnewfoundland
AT ravaliamohamad effectofvaginalselfsamplingoncervicalcancerscreeningratesacommunitybasedstudyinnewfoundland
AT mugfordgerry effectofvaginalselfsamplingoncervicalcancerscreeningratesacommunitybasedstudyinnewfoundland
AT pikeandrea effectofvaginalselfsamplingoncervicalcancerscreeningratesacommunitybasedstudyinnewfoundland
AT fortierjacqueline effectofvaginalselfsamplingoncervicalcancerscreeningratesacommunitybasedstudyinnewfoundland
AT peachmandy effectofvaginalselfsamplingoncervicalcancerscreeningratesacommunitybasedstudyinnewfoundland