Cargando…

An overview of systematic reviews of normal labor and delivery management

BACKGROUND: Despite the scientific and medical advances for management of complicated health issues, the current maternity care setting has increased risks for healthy women and their babies. The aim of this study was to conduct an overview of published systematic reviews on the interventions used m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iravani, Mina, Janghorbani, Mohsen, Zarean, Elahe, Bahrami, Masoud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4462052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26120327
_version_ 1782375603793559552
author Iravani, Mina
Janghorbani, Mohsen
Zarean, Elahe
Bahrami, Masoud
author_facet Iravani, Mina
Janghorbani, Mohsen
Zarean, Elahe
Bahrami, Masoud
author_sort Iravani, Mina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the scientific and medical advances for management of complicated health issues, the current maternity care setting has increased risks for healthy women and their babies. The aim of this study was to conduct an overview of published systematic reviews on the interventions used most commonly for management of normal labor and delivery in the first stage of labor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The online databases through March 2013, limited to systematic reviews of clinical trials were searched. An updated search was performed in April 2014. Two reviewers independently assessed data inclusion, extraction, and quality of methodology. RESULTS: Twenty-three reviews (16 Cochrane, 7 non-Cochrane), relating to the most common care practices for management of normal labor and delivery in the first stage of labor, were included. Evidence does not support routine enemas, routine perineal shaving, continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring, routine early amniotomy, and restriction of fluids and food during labor. Evidence supports continuity of midwifery care and support, encouragement to non-supine position, and freedom in movement throughout labor. There is insufficient evidence to support routine administration of intravenous fluids and antispasmodics during labor. More evidence is needed regarding delayed admission until active labor and use of partograph. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based maternity care emphasizes on the practices that increase safety for mother and baby. If policymakers and healthcare providers wish to promote obstetric care quality successfully, it is important that they implement evidence-based clinical practices in routine midwifery care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4462052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44620522015-06-26 An overview of systematic reviews of normal labor and delivery management Iravani, Mina Janghorbani, Mohsen Zarean, Elahe Bahrami, Masoud Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res Review Article BACKGROUND: Despite the scientific and medical advances for management of complicated health issues, the current maternity care setting has increased risks for healthy women and their babies. The aim of this study was to conduct an overview of published systematic reviews on the interventions used most commonly for management of normal labor and delivery in the first stage of labor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The online databases through March 2013, limited to systematic reviews of clinical trials were searched. An updated search was performed in April 2014. Two reviewers independently assessed data inclusion, extraction, and quality of methodology. RESULTS: Twenty-three reviews (16 Cochrane, 7 non-Cochrane), relating to the most common care practices for management of normal labor and delivery in the first stage of labor, were included. Evidence does not support routine enemas, routine perineal shaving, continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring, routine early amniotomy, and restriction of fluids and food during labor. Evidence supports continuity of midwifery care and support, encouragement to non-supine position, and freedom in movement throughout labor. There is insufficient evidence to support routine administration of intravenous fluids and antispasmodics during labor. More evidence is needed regarding delayed admission until active labor and use of partograph. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based maternity care emphasizes on the practices that increase safety for mother and baby. If policymakers and healthcare providers wish to promote obstetric care quality successfully, it is important that they implement evidence-based clinical practices in routine midwifery care. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4462052/ /pubmed/26120327 Text en Copyright: © Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Iravani, Mina
Janghorbani, Mohsen
Zarean, Elahe
Bahrami, Masoud
An overview of systematic reviews of normal labor and delivery management
title An overview of systematic reviews of normal labor and delivery management
title_full An overview of systematic reviews of normal labor and delivery management
title_fullStr An overview of systematic reviews of normal labor and delivery management
title_full_unstemmed An overview of systematic reviews of normal labor and delivery management
title_short An overview of systematic reviews of normal labor and delivery management
title_sort overview of systematic reviews of normal labor and delivery management
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4462052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26120327
work_keys_str_mv AT iravanimina anoverviewofsystematicreviewsofnormallaboranddeliverymanagement
AT janghorbanimohsen anoverviewofsystematicreviewsofnormallaboranddeliverymanagement
AT zareanelahe anoverviewofsystematicreviewsofnormallaboranddeliverymanagement
AT bahramimasoud anoverviewofsystematicreviewsofnormallaboranddeliverymanagement
AT iravanimina overviewofsystematicreviewsofnormallaboranddeliverymanagement
AT janghorbanimohsen overviewofsystematicreviewsofnormallaboranddeliverymanagement
AT zareanelahe overviewofsystematicreviewsofnormallaboranddeliverymanagement
AT bahramimasoud overviewofsystematicreviewsofnormallaboranddeliverymanagement