Cargando…

TruFit Plug for Repair of Osteochondral Defects—Where Is the Evidence? Systematic Review of Literature

OBJECTIVE: Treatment of osteochondral defects remains a challenge in orthopedic surgery. The TruFit plug has been investigated as a potential treatment method for osteochondral defects. This is a biphasic scaffold designed to stimulate cartilage and subchondral bone formation. The aim of this study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verhaegen, J., Clockaerts, S., Van Osch, G.J.V.M., Somville, J., Verdonk, P., Mertens, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4462248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26069706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603514548890
_version_ 1782375631473868800
author Verhaegen, J.
Clockaerts, S.
Van Osch, G.J.V.M.
Somville, J.
Verdonk, P.
Mertens, P.
author_facet Verhaegen, J.
Clockaerts, S.
Van Osch, G.J.V.M.
Somville, J.
Verdonk, P.
Mertens, P.
author_sort Verhaegen, J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Treatment of osteochondral defects remains a challenge in orthopedic surgery. The TruFit plug has been investigated as a potential treatment method for osteochondral defects. This is a biphasic scaffold designed to stimulate cartilage and subchondral bone formation. The aim of this study is to investigate clinical, radiological, and histological efficacy of the TruFit plug in restoring osteochondral defects in the joint. DESIGN: We performed a systematic search in five databases for clinical trials in which patients were treated with a TruFit plug for osteochondral defects. Studies had to report clinical, radiological, or histological outcome data. Quality of the included studies was assessed. RESULTS: Five studies describe clinical results, all indicating improvement at follow-up of 12 months compared to preoperative status. However, two studies reporting longer follow-up show deterioration of early improvement. Radiological evaluation indicates favorable MRI findings regarding filling of the defect and incorporation with adjacent cartilage at 24 months follow-up, but conflicting evidence exists on the properties of the newly formed overlying cartilage surface. None of the included studies showed evidence for bone ingrowth. The few histological data available confirmed these results. CONCLUSION: There are no data available that support superiority or equality of TruFit compared to conservative treatment or mosaicplasty/microfracture. Further investigation is needed to improve synthetic biphasic implants as therapy for osteochondral lesions. Randomized controlled clinical trials comparing TruFit plugs with an established treatment method are needed before further clinical use can be supported.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4462248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44622482016-01-01 TruFit Plug for Repair of Osteochondral Defects—Where Is the Evidence? Systematic Review of Literature Verhaegen, J. Clockaerts, S. Van Osch, G.J.V.M. Somville, J. Verdonk, P. Mertens, P. Cartilage Article OBJECTIVE: Treatment of osteochondral defects remains a challenge in orthopedic surgery. The TruFit plug has been investigated as a potential treatment method for osteochondral defects. This is a biphasic scaffold designed to stimulate cartilage and subchondral bone formation. The aim of this study is to investigate clinical, radiological, and histological efficacy of the TruFit plug in restoring osteochondral defects in the joint. DESIGN: We performed a systematic search in five databases for clinical trials in which patients were treated with a TruFit plug for osteochondral defects. Studies had to report clinical, radiological, or histological outcome data. Quality of the included studies was assessed. RESULTS: Five studies describe clinical results, all indicating improvement at follow-up of 12 months compared to preoperative status. However, two studies reporting longer follow-up show deterioration of early improvement. Radiological evaluation indicates favorable MRI findings regarding filling of the defect and incorporation with adjacent cartilage at 24 months follow-up, but conflicting evidence exists on the properties of the newly formed overlying cartilage surface. None of the included studies showed evidence for bone ingrowth. The few histological data available confirmed these results. CONCLUSION: There are no data available that support superiority or equality of TruFit compared to conservative treatment or mosaicplasty/microfracture. Further investigation is needed to improve synthetic biphasic implants as therapy for osteochondral lesions. Randomized controlled clinical trials comparing TruFit plugs with an established treatment method are needed before further clinical use can be supported. SAGE Publications 2015-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4462248/ /pubmed/26069706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603514548890 Text en © The Author(s) 2014
spellingShingle Article
Verhaegen, J.
Clockaerts, S.
Van Osch, G.J.V.M.
Somville, J.
Verdonk, P.
Mertens, P.
TruFit Plug for Repair of Osteochondral Defects—Where Is the Evidence? Systematic Review of Literature
title TruFit Plug for Repair of Osteochondral Defects—Where Is the Evidence? Systematic Review of Literature
title_full TruFit Plug for Repair of Osteochondral Defects—Where Is the Evidence? Systematic Review of Literature
title_fullStr TruFit Plug for Repair of Osteochondral Defects—Where Is the Evidence? Systematic Review of Literature
title_full_unstemmed TruFit Plug for Repair of Osteochondral Defects—Where Is the Evidence? Systematic Review of Literature
title_short TruFit Plug for Repair of Osteochondral Defects—Where Is the Evidence? Systematic Review of Literature
title_sort trufit plug for repair of osteochondral defects—where is the evidence? systematic review of literature
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4462248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26069706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1947603514548890
work_keys_str_mv AT verhaegenj trufitplugforrepairofosteochondraldefectswhereistheevidencesystematicreviewofliterature
AT clockaertss trufitplugforrepairofosteochondraldefectswhereistheevidencesystematicreviewofliterature
AT vanoschgjvm trufitplugforrepairofosteochondraldefectswhereistheevidencesystematicreviewofliterature
AT somvillej trufitplugforrepairofosteochondraldefectswhereistheevidencesystematicreviewofliterature
AT verdonkp trufitplugforrepairofosteochondraldefectswhereistheevidencesystematicreviewofliterature
AT mertensp trufitplugforrepairofosteochondraldefectswhereistheevidencesystematicreviewofliterature