Cargando…

Using the apparent diffusion coefficient to identifying MGMT promoter methylation status early in glioblastoma: importance of analytical method

INTRODUCTION: Accurate knowledge of O(6)-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter subtype in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is important for treatment. However, this test is not always available. Pre-operative diffusion MRI (dMRI) can be used to probe tumour biology using the apparent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rundle-Thiele, Dayle, Day, Bryan, Stringer, Brett, Fay, Michael, Martin, Jennifer, Jeffree, Rosalind L, Thomas, Paul, Bell, Christopher, Salvado, Olivier, Gal, Yaniv, Coulthard, Alan, Crozier, Stuart, Rose, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4462980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.103
_version_ 1782375747505094656
author Rundle-Thiele, Dayle
Day, Bryan
Stringer, Brett
Fay, Michael
Martin, Jennifer
Jeffree, Rosalind L
Thomas, Paul
Bell, Christopher
Salvado, Olivier
Gal, Yaniv
Coulthard, Alan
Crozier, Stuart
Rose, Stephen
author_facet Rundle-Thiele, Dayle
Day, Bryan
Stringer, Brett
Fay, Michael
Martin, Jennifer
Jeffree, Rosalind L
Thomas, Paul
Bell, Christopher
Salvado, Olivier
Gal, Yaniv
Coulthard, Alan
Crozier, Stuart
Rose, Stephen
author_sort Rundle-Thiele, Dayle
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Accurate knowledge of O(6)-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter subtype in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is important for treatment. However, this test is not always available. Pre-operative diffusion MRI (dMRI) can be used to probe tumour biology using the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC); however, its ability to act as a surrogate to predict MGMT status has shown mixed results. We investigated whether this was due to variations in the method used to analyse ADC. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective study of 32 patients with GBM who had MGMT status measured. Matching pre-operative MRI data were used to calculate the ADC within contrast enhancing regions of tumour. The relationship between ADC and MGMT was examined using two published ADC methods. RESULTS: A strong trend between a measure of ‘minimum ADC’ and methylation status was seen. An elevated minimum ADC was more likely in the methylated compared to the unmethylated MGMT group (U = 56, P = 0.0561). In contrast, utilising a two-mixture model histogram approach, a significant reduction in mean measure of the ‘low ADC’ component within the histogram was associated with an MGMT promoter methylation subtype (P < 0.0246). CONCLUSION: This study shows that within the same patient cohort, the method selected to analyse ADC measures has a significant bearing on the use of that metric as a surrogate marker of MGMT status. Thus for dMRI data to be clinically useful, consistent methods of data analysis need to be established prior to establishing any relationship with genetic or epigenetic profiling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4462980
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BlackWell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44629802015-06-16 Using the apparent diffusion coefficient to identifying MGMT promoter methylation status early in glioblastoma: importance of analytical method Rundle-Thiele, Dayle Day, Bryan Stringer, Brett Fay, Michael Martin, Jennifer Jeffree, Rosalind L Thomas, Paul Bell, Christopher Salvado, Olivier Gal, Yaniv Coulthard, Alan Crozier, Stuart Rose, Stephen J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Accurate knowledge of O(6)-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter subtype in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is important for treatment. However, this test is not always available. Pre-operative diffusion MRI (dMRI) can be used to probe tumour biology using the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC); however, its ability to act as a surrogate to predict MGMT status has shown mixed results. We investigated whether this was due to variations in the method used to analyse ADC. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective study of 32 patients with GBM who had MGMT status measured. Matching pre-operative MRI data were used to calculate the ADC within contrast enhancing regions of tumour. The relationship between ADC and MGMT was examined using two published ADC methods. RESULTS: A strong trend between a measure of ‘minimum ADC’ and methylation status was seen. An elevated minimum ADC was more likely in the methylated compared to the unmethylated MGMT group (U = 56, P = 0.0561). In contrast, utilising a two-mixture model histogram approach, a significant reduction in mean measure of the ‘low ADC’ component within the histogram was associated with an MGMT promoter methylation subtype (P < 0.0246). CONCLUSION: This study shows that within the same patient cohort, the method selected to analyse ADC measures has a significant bearing on the use of that metric as a surrogate marker of MGMT status. Thus for dMRI data to be clinically useful, consistent methods of data analysis need to be established prior to establishing any relationship with genetic or epigenetic profiling. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015-06 2015-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4462980/ /pubmed/26229673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.103 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd on behalf of Australian Institute of Radiography and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Rundle-Thiele, Dayle
Day, Bryan
Stringer, Brett
Fay, Michael
Martin, Jennifer
Jeffree, Rosalind L
Thomas, Paul
Bell, Christopher
Salvado, Olivier
Gal, Yaniv
Coulthard, Alan
Crozier, Stuart
Rose, Stephen
Using the apparent diffusion coefficient to identifying MGMT promoter methylation status early in glioblastoma: importance of analytical method
title Using the apparent diffusion coefficient to identifying MGMT promoter methylation status early in glioblastoma: importance of analytical method
title_full Using the apparent diffusion coefficient to identifying MGMT promoter methylation status early in glioblastoma: importance of analytical method
title_fullStr Using the apparent diffusion coefficient to identifying MGMT promoter methylation status early in glioblastoma: importance of analytical method
title_full_unstemmed Using the apparent diffusion coefficient to identifying MGMT promoter methylation status early in glioblastoma: importance of analytical method
title_short Using the apparent diffusion coefficient to identifying MGMT promoter methylation status early in glioblastoma: importance of analytical method
title_sort using the apparent diffusion coefficient to identifying mgmt promoter methylation status early in glioblastoma: importance of analytical method
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4462980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.103
work_keys_str_mv AT rundlethieledayle usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod
AT daybryan usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod
AT stringerbrett usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod
AT faymichael usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod
AT martinjennifer usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod
AT jeffreerosalindl usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod
AT thomaspaul usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod
AT bellchristopher usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod
AT salvadoolivier usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod
AT galyaniv usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod
AT coulthardalan usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod
AT crozierstuart usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod
AT rosestephen usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod