Cargando…
Using the apparent diffusion coefficient to identifying MGMT promoter methylation status early in glioblastoma: importance of analytical method
INTRODUCTION: Accurate knowledge of O(6)-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter subtype in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is important for treatment. However, this test is not always available. Pre-operative diffusion MRI (dMRI) can be used to probe tumour biology using the apparent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BlackWell Publishing Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4462980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.103 |
_version_ | 1782375747505094656 |
---|---|
author | Rundle-Thiele, Dayle Day, Bryan Stringer, Brett Fay, Michael Martin, Jennifer Jeffree, Rosalind L Thomas, Paul Bell, Christopher Salvado, Olivier Gal, Yaniv Coulthard, Alan Crozier, Stuart Rose, Stephen |
author_facet | Rundle-Thiele, Dayle Day, Bryan Stringer, Brett Fay, Michael Martin, Jennifer Jeffree, Rosalind L Thomas, Paul Bell, Christopher Salvado, Olivier Gal, Yaniv Coulthard, Alan Crozier, Stuart Rose, Stephen |
author_sort | Rundle-Thiele, Dayle |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Accurate knowledge of O(6)-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter subtype in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is important for treatment. However, this test is not always available. Pre-operative diffusion MRI (dMRI) can be used to probe tumour biology using the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC); however, its ability to act as a surrogate to predict MGMT status has shown mixed results. We investigated whether this was due to variations in the method used to analyse ADC. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective study of 32 patients with GBM who had MGMT status measured. Matching pre-operative MRI data were used to calculate the ADC within contrast enhancing regions of tumour. The relationship between ADC and MGMT was examined using two published ADC methods. RESULTS: A strong trend between a measure of ‘minimum ADC’ and methylation status was seen. An elevated minimum ADC was more likely in the methylated compared to the unmethylated MGMT group (U = 56, P = 0.0561). In contrast, utilising a two-mixture model histogram approach, a significant reduction in mean measure of the ‘low ADC’ component within the histogram was associated with an MGMT promoter methylation subtype (P < 0.0246). CONCLUSION: This study shows that within the same patient cohort, the method selected to analyse ADC measures has a significant bearing on the use of that metric as a surrogate marker of MGMT status. Thus for dMRI data to be clinically useful, consistent methods of data analysis need to be established prior to establishing any relationship with genetic or epigenetic profiling. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4462980 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BlackWell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44629802015-06-16 Using the apparent diffusion coefficient to identifying MGMT promoter methylation status early in glioblastoma: importance of analytical method Rundle-Thiele, Dayle Day, Bryan Stringer, Brett Fay, Michael Martin, Jennifer Jeffree, Rosalind L Thomas, Paul Bell, Christopher Salvado, Olivier Gal, Yaniv Coulthard, Alan Crozier, Stuart Rose, Stephen J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Accurate knowledge of O(6)-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter subtype in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is important for treatment. However, this test is not always available. Pre-operative diffusion MRI (dMRI) can be used to probe tumour biology using the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC); however, its ability to act as a surrogate to predict MGMT status has shown mixed results. We investigated whether this was due to variations in the method used to analyse ADC. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective study of 32 patients with GBM who had MGMT status measured. Matching pre-operative MRI data were used to calculate the ADC within contrast enhancing regions of tumour. The relationship between ADC and MGMT was examined using two published ADC methods. RESULTS: A strong trend between a measure of ‘minimum ADC’ and methylation status was seen. An elevated minimum ADC was more likely in the methylated compared to the unmethylated MGMT group (U = 56, P = 0.0561). In contrast, utilising a two-mixture model histogram approach, a significant reduction in mean measure of the ‘low ADC’ component within the histogram was associated with an MGMT promoter methylation subtype (P < 0.0246). CONCLUSION: This study shows that within the same patient cohort, the method selected to analyse ADC measures has a significant bearing on the use of that metric as a surrogate marker of MGMT status. Thus for dMRI data to be clinically useful, consistent methods of data analysis need to be established prior to establishing any relationship with genetic or epigenetic profiling. BlackWell Publishing Ltd 2015-06 2015-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4462980/ /pubmed/26229673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.103 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd on behalf of Australian Institute of Radiography and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Rundle-Thiele, Dayle Day, Bryan Stringer, Brett Fay, Michael Martin, Jennifer Jeffree, Rosalind L Thomas, Paul Bell, Christopher Salvado, Olivier Gal, Yaniv Coulthard, Alan Crozier, Stuart Rose, Stephen Using the apparent diffusion coefficient to identifying MGMT promoter methylation status early in glioblastoma: importance of analytical method |
title | Using the apparent diffusion coefficient to identifying MGMT promoter methylation status early in glioblastoma: importance of analytical method |
title_full | Using the apparent diffusion coefficient to identifying MGMT promoter methylation status early in glioblastoma: importance of analytical method |
title_fullStr | Using the apparent diffusion coefficient to identifying MGMT promoter methylation status early in glioblastoma: importance of analytical method |
title_full_unstemmed | Using the apparent diffusion coefficient to identifying MGMT promoter methylation status early in glioblastoma: importance of analytical method |
title_short | Using the apparent diffusion coefficient to identifying MGMT promoter methylation status early in glioblastoma: importance of analytical method |
title_sort | using the apparent diffusion coefficient to identifying mgmt promoter methylation status early in glioblastoma: importance of analytical method |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4462980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26229673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.103 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rundlethieledayle usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod AT daybryan usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod AT stringerbrett usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod AT faymichael usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod AT martinjennifer usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod AT jeffreerosalindl usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod AT thomaspaul usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod AT bellchristopher usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod AT salvadoolivier usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod AT galyaniv usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod AT coulthardalan usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod AT crozierstuart usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod AT rosestephen usingtheapparentdiffusioncoefficienttoidentifyingmgmtpromotermethylationstatusearlyinglioblastomaimportanceofanalyticalmethod |