Cargando…

Right ventricular failure due to chronic pressure load: What have we learned in animal models since the NIH working group statement?

Right ventricular (RV) failure determines outcome in patients with pulmonary hypertension, congenital heart diseases and in left ventricular failure. In 2006, the Working Group on Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Right Heart Failure of the NIH advocated the development of preclinical models to s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Borgdorff, Marinus A. J., Dickinson, Michael G., Berger, Rolf M. F., Bartelds, Beatrijs
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4463984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25771982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10741-015-9479-6
_version_ 1782375868035760128
author Borgdorff, Marinus A. J.
Dickinson, Michael G.
Berger, Rolf M. F.
Bartelds, Beatrijs
author_facet Borgdorff, Marinus A. J.
Dickinson, Michael G.
Berger, Rolf M. F.
Bartelds, Beatrijs
author_sort Borgdorff, Marinus A. J.
collection PubMed
description Right ventricular (RV) failure determines outcome in patients with pulmonary hypertension, congenital heart diseases and in left ventricular failure. In 2006, the Working Group on Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Right Heart Failure of the NIH advocated the development of preclinical models to study the pathophysiology and pathobiology of RV failure. In this review, we summarize the progress of research into the pathobiology of RV failure and potential therapeutic interventions. The picture emerging from this research is that RV adaptation to increased afterload is characterized by increased contractility, dilatation and hypertrophy. Clinical RV failure is associated with progressive diastolic deterioration and disturbed ventricular–arterial coupling in the presence of increased contractility. The pathobiology of the failing RV shows similarities with that of the LV and is marked by lack of adequate increase in capillary density leading to a hypoxic environment and oxidative stress and a metabolic switch from fatty acids to glucose utilization. However, RV failure also has characteristic features. So far, therapies aiming to specifically improve RV function have had limited success. The use of beta blockers and sildenafil may hold promise, but new therapies have to be developed. The use of recently developed animal models will aid in further understanding of the pathobiology of RV failure and development of new therapeutic strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4463984
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44639842015-06-17 Right ventricular failure due to chronic pressure load: What have we learned in animal models since the NIH working group statement? Borgdorff, Marinus A. J. Dickinson, Michael G. Berger, Rolf M. F. Bartelds, Beatrijs Heart Fail Rev Article Right ventricular (RV) failure determines outcome in patients with pulmonary hypertension, congenital heart diseases and in left ventricular failure. In 2006, the Working Group on Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Right Heart Failure of the NIH advocated the development of preclinical models to study the pathophysiology and pathobiology of RV failure. In this review, we summarize the progress of research into the pathobiology of RV failure and potential therapeutic interventions. The picture emerging from this research is that RV adaptation to increased afterload is characterized by increased contractility, dilatation and hypertrophy. Clinical RV failure is associated with progressive diastolic deterioration and disturbed ventricular–arterial coupling in the presence of increased contractility. The pathobiology of the failing RV shows similarities with that of the LV and is marked by lack of adequate increase in capillary density leading to a hypoxic environment and oxidative stress and a metabolic switch from fatty acids to glucose utilization. However, RV failure also has characteristic features. So far, therapies aiming to specifically improve RV function have had limited success. The use of beta blockers and sildenafil may hold promise, but new therapies have to be developed. The use of recently developed animal models will aid in further understanding of the pathobiology of RV failure and development of new therapeutic strategies. Springer US 2015-03-13 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4463984/ /pubmed/25771982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10741-015-9479-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Borgdorff, Marinus A. J.
Dickinson, Michael G.
Berger, Rolf M. F.
Bartelds, Beatrijs
Right ventricular failure due to chronic pressure load: What have we learned in animal models since the NIH working group statement?
title Right ventricular failure due to chronic pressure load: What have we learned in animal models since the NIH working group statement?
title_full Right ventricular failure due to chronic pressure load: What have we learned in animal models since the NIH working group statement?
title_fullStr Right ventricular failure due to chronic pressure load: What have we learned in animal models since the NIH working group statement?
title_full_unstemmed Right ventricular failure due to chronic pressure load: What have we learned in animal models since the NIH working group statement?
title_short Right ventricular failure due to chronic pressure load: What have we learned in animal models since the NIH working group statement?
title_sort right ventricular failure due to chronic pressure load: what have we learned in animal models since the nih working group statement?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4463984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25771982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10741-015-9479-6
work_keys_str_mv AT borgdorffmarinusaj rightventricularfailureduetochronicpressureloadwhathavewelearnedinanimalmodelssincethenihworkinggroupstatement
AT dickinsonmichaelg rightventricularfailureduetochronicpressureloadwhathavewelearnedinanimalmodelssincethenihworkinggroupstatement
AT bergerrolfmf rightventricularfailureduetochronicpressureloadwhathavewelearnedinanimalmodelssincethenihworkinggroupstatement
AT barteldsbeatrijs rightventricularfailureduetochronicpressureloadwhathavewelearnedinanimalmodelssincethenihworkinggroupstatement