Cargando…

Lost to follow-up among pregnant women in a multi-site community based maternal and newborn health registry: a prospective study

BACKGROUND: It is important when conducting epidemiologic studies to closely monitor lost to follow up (LTFU) rates. A high LTFU rate may lead to incomplete study results which in turn can introduce bias to the trial or study, threatening the validity of the findings. There is scarce information on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marete, Irene, Tenge, Constance, Chemweno, Carolyne, Bucher, Sherri, Pasha, Omrana, Ramadurg, Umesh Y, Mastiholi, Shivanand C, Chiwila, Melody, Patel, Archana, Althabe, Fernando, Garces, Ana, Moore, Janet L, Liechty, Edward A, Derman, Richard J, Hibberd, Patricia L, Hambidge, K Michael, Goldenberg, Robert L, Carlo, Waldemar A, Koso-Thomas, Marion, McClure, Elizabeth M, Esamai, Fabian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4464022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26062899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-12-S2-S4
_version_ 1782375876179001344
author Marete, Irene
Tenge, Constance
Chemweno, Carolyne
Bucher, Sherri
Pasha, Omrana
Ramadurg, Umesh Y
Mastiholi, Shivanand C
Chiwila, Melody
Patel, Archana
Althabe, Fernando
Garces, Ana
Moore, Janet L
Liechty, Edward A
Derman, Richard J
Hibberd, Patricia L
Hambidge, K Michael
Goldenberg, Robert L
Carlo, Waldemar A
Koso-Thomas, Marion
McClure, Elizabeth M
Esamai, Fabian
author_facet Marete, Irene
Tenge, Constance
Chemweno, Carolyne
Bucher, Sherri
Pasha, Omrana
Ramadurg, Umesh Y
Mastiholi, Shivanand C
Chiwila, Melody
Patel, Archana
Althabe, Fernando
Garces, Ana
Moore, Janet L
Liechty, Edward A
Derman, Richard J
Hibberd, Patricia L
Hambidge, K Michael
Goldenberg, Robert L
Carlo, Waldemar A
Koso-Thomas, Marion
McClure, Elizabeth M
Esamai, Fabian
author_sort Marete, Irene
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is important when conducting epidemiologic studies to closely monitor lost to follow up (LTFU) rates. A high LTFU rate may lead to incomplete study results which in turn can introduce bias to the trial or study, threatening the validity of the findings. There is scarce information on LTFU in prospective community-based perinatal epidemiological studies. This paper reports the rates of LTFU, describes socio-demographic characteristics, and pregnancy/delivery outcomes of mothers LTFU in a large community-based pregnancy registry study. METHODS: Data were from a prospective, population-based observational study of the Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research Maternal Newborn Health Registry (MNHR). This is a multi-centre, international study in which pregnant women were enrolled in mid-pregnancy, followed through parturition and 42 days post-delivery. Risk for LTFU was calculated within a 95%CI. RESULTS: A total of 282,626 subjects were enrolled in this study, of which 4,893 were lost to follow-up. Overall, there was a 1.7% LTFU to follow up rate. Factors associated with a higher LTFU included mothers who did not know their last menstrual period (RR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1, 4.4), maternal age of < 20 years (RR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1, 1.3), women with no formal education (RR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1, 1.4), and attending a government clinic for antenatal care (RR 2.0, 95% CI 1.4, 2.8). Post-natal factors associated with a higher LTFU rate included a newborn with feeding problems (RR 1.6, 94% CI 1.2, 2.2). CONCLUSIONS: The LTFU rate in this community-based registry was low (1.7%). Maternal age, maternal level of education, pregnancy status at enrollment and using a government facility for ANC are factors associated with being LTFU. Strategies to ensure representation and high retention in community studies are important to informing progress toward public health goals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration at the Clinicaltrials.gov (ID# NCT01073475).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4464022
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44640222015-06-29 Lost to follow-up among pregnant women in a multi-site community based maternal and newborn health registry: a prospective study Marete, Irene Tenge, Constance Chemweno, Carolyne Bucher, Sherri Pasha, Omrana Ramadurg, Umesh Y Mastiholi, Shivanand C Chiwila, Melody Patel, Archana Althabe, Fernando Garces, Ana Moore, Janet L Liechty, Edward A Derman, Richard J Hibberd, Patricia L Hambidge, K Michael Goldenberg, Robert L Carlo, Waldemar A Koso-Thomas, Marion McClure, Elizabeth M Esamai, Fabian Reprod Health Research BACKGROUND: It is important when conducting epidemiologic studies to closely monitor lost to follow up (LTFU) rates. A high LTFU rate may lead to incomplete study results which in turn can introduce bias to the trial or study, threatening the validity of the findings. There is scarce information on LTFU in prospective community-based perinatal epidemiological studies. This paper reports the rates of LTFU, describes socio-demographic characteristics, and pregnancy/delivery outcomes of mothers LTFU in a large community-based pregnancy registry study. METHODS: Data were from a prospective, population-based observational study of the Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research Maternal Newborn Health Registry (MNHR). This is a multi-centre, international study in which pregnant women were enrolled in mid-pregnancy, followed through parturition and 42 days post-delivery. Risk for LTFU was calculated within a 95%CI. RESULTS: A total of 282,626 subjects were enrolled in this study, of which 4,893 were lost to follow-up. Overall, there was a 1.7% LTFU to follow up rate. Factors associated with a higher LTFU included mothers who did not know their last menstrual period (RR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1, 4.4), maternal age of < 20 years (RR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1, 1.3), women with no formal education (RR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1, 1.4), and attending a government clinic for antenatal care (RR 2.0, 95% CI 1.4, 2.8). Post-natal factors associated with a higher LTFU rate included a newborn with feeding problems (RR 1.6, 94% CI 1.2, 2.2). CONCLUSIONS: The LTFU rate in this community-based registry was low (1.7%). Maternal age, maternal level of education, pregnancy status at enrollment and using a government facility for ANC are factors associated with being LTFU. Strategies to ensure representation and high retention in community studies are important to informing progress toward public health goals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration at the Clinicaltrials.gov (ID# NCT01073475). BioMed Central 2015-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4464022/ /pubmed/26062899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-12-S2-S4 Text en Copyright © 2015 Marete et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Marete, Irene
Tenge, Constance
Chemweno, Carolyne
Bucher, Sherri
Pasha, Omrana
Ramadurg, Umesh Y
Mastiholi, Shivanand C
Chiwila, Melody
Patel, Archana
Althabe, Fernando
Garces, Ana
Moore, Janet L
Liechty, Edward A
Derman, Richard J
Hibberd, Patricia L
Hambidge, K Michael
Goldenberg, Robert L
Carlo, Waldemar A
Koso-Thomas, Marion
McClure, Elizabeth M
Esamai, Fabian
Lost to follow-up among pregnant women in a multi-site community based maternal and newborn health registry: a prospective study
title Lost to follow-up among pregnant women in a multi-site community based maternal and newborn health registry: a prospective study
title_full Lost to follow-up among pregnant women in a multi-site community based maternal and newborn health registry: a prospective study
title_fullStr Lost to follow-up among pregnant women in a multi-site community based maternal and newborn health registry: a prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Lost to follow-up among pregnant women in a multi-site community based maternal and newborn health registry: a prospective study
title_short Lost to follow-up among pregnant women in a multi-site community based maternal and newborn health registry: a prospective study
title_sort lost to follow-up among pregnant women in a multi-site community based maternal and newborn health registry: a prospective study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4464022/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26062899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-12-S2-S4
work_keys_str_mv AT mareteirene losttofollowupamongpregnantwomeninamultisitecommunitybasedmaternalandnewbornhealthregistryaprospectivestudy
AT tengeconstance losttofollowupamongpregnantwomeninamultisitecommunitybasedmaternalandnewbornhealthregistryaprospectivestudy
AT chemwenocarolyne losttofollowupamongpregnantwomeninamultisitecommunitybasedmaternalandnewbornhealthregistryaprospectivestudy
AT buchersherri losttofollowupamongpregnantwomeninamultisitecommunitybasedmaternalandnewbornhealthregistryaprospectivestudy
AT pashaomrana losttofollowupamongpregnantwomeninamultisitecommunitybasedmaternalandnewbornhealthregistryaprospectivestudy
AT ramadurgumeshy losttofollowupamongpregnantwomeninamultisitecommunitybasedmaternalandnewbornhealthregistryaprospectivestudy
AT mastiholishivanandc losttofollowupamongpregnantwomeninamultisitecommunitybasedmaternalandnewbornhealthregistryaprospectivestudy
AT chiwilamelody losttofollowupamongpregnantwomeninamultisitecommunitybasedmaternalandnewbornhealthregistryaprospectivestudy
AT patelarchana losttofollowupamongpregnantwomeninamultisitecommunitybasedmaternalandnewbornhealthregistryaprospectivestudy
AT althabefernando losttofollowupamongpregnantwomeninamultisitecommunitybasedmaternalandnewbornhealthregistryaprospectivestudy
AT garcesana losttofollowupamongpregnantwomeninamultisitecommunitybasedmaternalandnewbornhealthregistryaprospectivestudy
AT moorejanetl losttofollowupamongpregnantwomeninamultisitecommunitybasedmaternalandnewbornhealthregistryaprospectivestudy
AT liechtyedwarda losttofollowupamongpregnantwomeninamultisitecommunitybasedmaternalandnewbornhealthregistryaprospectivestudy
AT dermanrichardj losttofollowupamongpregnantwomeninamultisitecommunitybasedmaternalandnewbornhealthregistryaprospectivestudy
AT hibberdpatricial losttofollowupamongpregnantwomeninamultisitecommunitybasedmaternalandnewbornhealthregistryaprospectivestudy
AT hambidgekmichael losttofollowupamongpregnantwomeninamultisitecommunitybasedmaternalandnewbornhealthregistryaprospectivestudy
AT goldenbergrobertl losttofollowupamongpregnantwomeninamultisitecommunitybasedmaternalandnewbornhealthregistryaprospectivestudy
AT carlowaldemara losttofollowupamongpregnantwomeninamultisitecommunitybasedmaternalandnewbornhealthregistryaprospectivestudy
AT kosothomasmarion losttofollowupamongpregnantwomeninamultisitecommunitybasedmaternalandnewbornhealthregistryaprospectivestudy
AT mcclureelizabethm losttofollowupamongpregnantwomeninamultisitecommunitybasedmaternalandnewbornhealthregistryaprospectivestudy
AT esamaifabian losttofollowupamongpregnantwomeninamultisitecommunitybasedmaternalandnewbornhealthregistryaprospectivestudy