Cargando…
Researchers’ perspectives on scientific and ethical issues with transcranial direct current stimulation: An international survey
In the last decade, an increasing number of studies have suggested that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may enhance brain function in healthy individuals, and ameliorate cognitive and other symptoms in patients suffering from various medical conditions. This, along with its presumed s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4464285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26068889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep10618 |
_version_ | 1782375932725559296 |
---|---|
author | Riggall, Kate Forlini, Cynthia Carter, Adrian Hall, Wayne Weier, Megan Partridge, Brad Meinzer, Marcus |
author_facet | Riggall, Kate Forlini, Cynthia Carter, Adrian Hall, Wayne Weier, Megan Partridge, Brad Meinzer, Marcus |
author_sort | Riggall, Kate |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the last decade, an increasing number of studies have suggested that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may enhance brain function in healthy individuals, and ameliorate cognitive and other symptoms in patients suffering from various medical conditions. This, along with its presumed safety, simplicity, and affordability, has generated great enthusiasm amongst researchers, clinicians, patient populations, and the public (including a growing “do-it-yourself” community). However, discussion about the effectiveness and ethics of tDCS thus far has been confined to small groups of tDCS researchers and bioethicists. We conducted an international online survey targeting the opinions of researchers using tDCS who were asked to rate the technique’s efficacy in different contexts. We also surveyed opinions about ethical concerns, self-enhancement and public availability. 265 complete responses were received and analyzed statistically and thematically. Our results emphasize the potential uses of tDCS in clinical and research contexts, but also highlight a number of emerging methodological and safety concerns, ethical challenges and the need for improved communication between researchers and bioethicists with regard to regulation of the device. Neither the media reputation of tDCS as a “miracle device” nor concerns expressed in recent neuroethical publications were entirely borne out in expert opinion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4464285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44642852015-06-18 Researchers’ perspectives on scientific and ethical issues with transcranial direct current stimulation: An international survey Riggall, Kate Forlini, Cynthia Carter, Adrian Hall, Wayne Weier, Megan Partridge, Brad Meinzer, Marcus Sci Rep Article In the last decade, an increasing number of studies have suggested that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may enhance brain function in healthy individuals, and ameliorate cognitive and other symptoms in patients suffering from various medical conditions. This, along with its presumed safety, simplicity, and affordability, has generated great enthusiasm amongst researchers, clinicians, patient populations, and the public (including a growing “do-it-yourself” community). However, discussion about the effectiveness and ethics of tDCS thus far has been confined to small groups of tDCS researchers and bioethicists. We conducted an international online survey targeting the opinions of researchers using tDCS who were asked to rate the technique’s efficacy in different contexts. We also surveyed opinions about ethical concerns, self-enhancement and public availability. 265 complete responses were received and analyzed statistically and thematically. Our results emphasize the potential uses of tDCS in clinical and research contexts, but also highlight a number of emerging methodological and safety concerns, ethical challenges and the need for improved communication between researchers and bioethicists with regard to regulation of the device. Neither the media reputation of tDCS as a “miracle device” nor concerns expressed in recent neuroethical publications were entirely borne out in expert opinion. Nature Publishing Group 2015-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4464285/ /pubmed/26068889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep10618 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Riggall, Kate Forlini, Cynthia Carter, Adrian Hall, Wayne Weier, Megan Partridge, Brad Meinzer, Marcus Researchers’ perspectives on scientific and ethical issues with transcranial direct current stimulation: An international survey |
title | Researchers’ perspectives on scientific and ethical issues with transcranial direct current stimulation: An international survey |
title_full | Researchers’ perspectives on scientific and ethical issues with transcranial direct current stimulation: An international survey |
title_fullStr | Researchers’ perspectives on scientific and ethical issues with transcranial direct current stimulation: An international survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Researchers’ perspectives on scientific and ethical issues with transcranial direct current stimulation: An international survey |
title_short | Researchers’ perspectives on scientific and ethical issues with transcranial direct current stimulation: An international survey |
title_sort | researchers’ perspectives on scientific and ethical issues with transcranial direct current stimulation: an international survey |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4464285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26068889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep10618 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT riggallkate researchersperspectivesonscientificandethicalissueswithtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationaninternationalsurvey AT forlinicynthia researchersperspectivesonscientificandethicalissueswithtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationaninternationalsurvey AT carteradrian researchersperspectivesonscientificandethicalissueswithtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationaninternationalsurvey AT hallwayne researchersperspectivesonscientificandethicalissueswithtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationaninternationalsurvey AT weiermegan researchersperspectivesonscientificandethicalissueswithtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationaninternationalsurvey AT partridgebrad researchersperspectivesonscientificandethicalissueswithtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationaninternationalsurvey AT meinzermarcus researchersperspectivesonscientificandethicalissueswithtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationaninternationalsurvey |