Cargando…

Peptide–polymer ligands for a tandem WW-domain, an adaptive multivalent protein–protein interaction: lessons on the thermodynamic fitness of flexible ligands

Three polymers, poly(N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide) (pHPMA), hyperbranched polyglycerol (hPG), and dextran were investigated as carriers for multivalent ligands targeting the adaptive tandem WW-domain of formin-binding protein (FBP21). Polymer carriers were conjugated with 3–9 copies of the prol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koschek, Katharina, Durmaz, Vedat, Krylova, Oxana, Wieczorek, Marek, Gupta, Shilpi, Richter, Martin, Bujotzek, Alexander, Fischer, Christina, Haag, Rainer, Freund, Christian, Weber, Marcus, Rademann, Jörg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Beilstein-Institut 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4464424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26124884
http://dx.doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.11.93
_version_ 1782375966589321216
author Koschek, Katharina
Durmaz, Vedat
Krylova, Oxana
Wieczorek, Marek
Gupta, Shilpi
Richter, Martin
Bujotzek, Alexander
Fischer, Christina
Haag, Rainer
Freund, Christian
Weber, Marcus
Rademann, Jörg
author_facet Koschek, Katharina
Durmaz, Vedat
Krylova, Oxana
Wieczorek, Marek
Gupta, Shilpi
Richter, Martin
Bujotzek, Alexander
Fischer, Christina
Haag, Rainer
Freund, Christian
Weber, Marcus
Rademann, Jörg
author_sort Koschek, Katharina
collection PubMed
description Three polymers, poly(N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide) (pHPMA), hyperbranched polyglycerol (hPG), and dextran were investigated as carriers for multivalent ligands targeting the adaptive tandem WW-domain of formin-binding protein (FBP21). Polymer carriers were conjugated with 3–9 copies of the proline-rich decapeptide GPPPRGPPPR-NH(2) (P1). Binding of the obtained peptide–polymer conjugates to the tandem WW-domain was investigated employing isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) to determine the binding affinity, the enthalpic and entropic contributions to free binding energy, and the stoichiometry of binding for all peptide–polymer conjugates. Binding affinities of all multivalent ligands were in the µM range, strongly amplified compared to the monovalent ligand P1 with a K(D) > 1 mM. In addition, concise differences were observed, pHPMA and hPG carriers showed moderate affinity and bound 2.3–2.8 peptides per protein binding site resulting in the formation of aggregates. Dextran-based conjugates displayed affinities down to 1.2 µM, forming complexes with low stoichiometry, and no precipitation. Experimental results were compared with parameters obtained from molecular dynamics simulations in order to understand the observed differences between the three carrier materials. In summary, the more rigid and condensed peptide–polymer conjugates based on the dextran scaffold seem to be superior to induce multivalent binding and to increase affinity, while the more flexible and dendritic polymers, pHPMA and hPG are suitable to induce crosslinking upon binding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4464424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Beilstein-Institut
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44644242015-06-29 Peptide–polymer ligands for a tandem WW-domain, an adaptive multivalent protein–protein interaction: lessons on the thermodynamic fitness of flexible ligands Koschek, Katharina Durmaz, Vedat Krylova, Oxana Wieczorek, Marek Gupta, Shilpi Richter, Martin Bujotzek, Alexander Fischer, Christina Haag, Rainer Freund, Christian Weber, Marcus Rademann, Jörg Beilstein J Org Chem Full Research Paper Three polymers, poly(N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide) (pHPMA), hyperbranched polyglycerol (hPG), and dextran were investigated as carriers for multivalent ligands targeting the adaptive tandem WW-domain of formin-binding protein (FBP21). Polymer carriers were conjugated with 3–9 copies of the proline-rich decapeptide GPPPRGPPPR-NH(2) (P1). Binding of the obtained peptide–polymer conjugates to the tandem WW-domain was investigated employing isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) to determine the binding affinity, the enthalpic and entropic contributions to free binding energy, and the stoichiometry of binding for all peptide–polymer conjugates. Binding affinities of all multivalent ligands were in the µM range, strongly amplified compared to the monovalent ligand P1 with a K(D) > 1 mM. In addition, concise differences were observed, pHPMA and hPG carriers showed moderate affinity and bound 2.3–2.8 peptides per protein binding site resulting in the formation of aggregates. Dextran-based conjugates displayed affinities down to 1.2 µM, forming complexes with low stoichiometry, and no precipitation. Experimental results were compared with parameters obtained from molecular dynamics simulations in order to understand the observed differences between the three carrier materials. In summary, the more rigid and condensed peptide–polymer conjugates based on the dextran scaffold seem to be superior to induce multivalent binding and to increase affinity, while the more flexible and dendritic polymers, pHPMA and hPG are suitable to induce crosslinking upon binding. Beilstein-Institut 2015-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4464424/ /pubmed/26124884 http://dx.doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.11.93 Text en Copyright © 2015, Koschek et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc/termsThis is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc/terms)
spellingShingle Full Research Paper
Koschek, Katharina
Durmaz, Vedat
Krylova, Oxana
Wieczorek, Marek
Gupta, Shilpi
Richter, Martin
Bujotzek, Alexander
Fischer, Christina
Haag, Rainer
Freund, Christian
Weber, Marcus
Rademann, Jörg
Peptide–polymer ligands for a tandem WW-domain, an adaptive multivalent protein–protein interaction: lessons on the thermodynamic fitness of flexible ligands
title Peptide–polymer ligands for a tandem WW-domain, an adaptive multivalent protein–protein interaction: lessons on the thermodynamic fitness of flexible ligands
title_full Peptide–polymer ligands for a tandem WW-domain, an adaptive multivalent protein–protein interaction: lessons on the thermodynamic fitness of flexible ligands
title_fullStr Peptide–polymer ligands for a tandem WW-domain, an adaptive multivalent protein–protein interaction: lessons on the thermodynamic fitness of flexible ligands
title_full_unstemmed Peptide–polymer ligands for a tandem WW-domain, an adaptive multivalent protein–protein interaction: lessons on the thermodynamic fitness of flexible ligands
title_short Peptide–polymer ligands for a tandem WW-domain, an adaptive multivalent protein–protein interaction: lessons on the thermodynamic fitness of flexible ligands
title_sort peptide–polymer ligands for a tandem ww-domain, an adaptive multivalent protein–protein interaction: lessons on the thermodynamic fitness of flexible ligands
topic Full Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4464424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26124884
http://dx.doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.11.93
work_keys_str_mv AT koschekkatharina peptidepolymerligandsforatandemwwdomainanadaptivemultivalentproteinproteininteractionlessonsonthethermodynamicfitnessofflexibleligands
AT durmazvedat peptidepolymerligandsforatandemwwdomainanadaptivemultivalentproteinproteininteractionlessonsonthethermodynamicfitnessofflexibleligands
AT krylovaoxana peptidepolymerligandsforatandemwwdomainanadaptivemultivalentproteinproteininteractionlessonsonthethermodynamicfitnessofflexibleligands
AT wieczorekmarek peptidepolymerligandsforatandemwwdomainanadaptivemultivalentproteinproteininteractionlessonsonthethermodynamicfitnessofflexibleligands
AT guptashilpi peptidepolymerligandsforatandemwwdomainanadaptivemultivalentproteinproteininteractionlessonsonthethermodynamicfitnessofflexibleligands
AT richtermartin peptidepolymerligandsforatandemwwdomainanadaptivemultivalentproteinproteininteractionlessonsonthethermodynamicfitnessofflexibleligands
AT bujotzekalexander peptidepolymerligandsforatandemwwdomainanadaptivemultivalentproteinproteininteractionlessonsonthethermodynamicfitnessofflexibleligands
AT fischerchristina peptidepolymerligandsforatandemwwdomainanadaptivemultivalentproteinproteininteractionlessonsonthethermodynamicfitnessofflexibleligands
AT haagrainer peptidepolymerligandsforatandemwwdomainanadaptivemultivalentproteinproteininteractionlessonsonthethermodynamicfitnessofflexibleligands
AT freundchristian peptidepolymerligandsforatandemwwdomainanadaptivemultivalentproteinproteininteractionlessonsonthethermodynamicfitnessofflexibleligands
AT webermarcus peptidepolymerligandsforatandemwwdomainanadaptivemultivalentproteinproteininteractionlessonsonthethermodynamicfitnessofflexibleligands
AT rademannjorg peptidepolymerligandsforatandemwwdomainanadaptivemultivalentproteinproteininteractionlessonsonthethermodynamicfitnessofflexibleligands