Cargando…

Coccidian Parasites and Conservation Implications for the Endangered Whooping Crane (Grus americana)

While the population of endangered whooping cranes (Grus americana) has grown from 15 individuals in 1941 to an estimated 304 birds today, the population growth is not sufficient to support a down-listing of the species to threatened status. The degree to which disease may be limiting the population...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bertram, Miranda R., Hamer, Gabriel L., Snowden, Karen F., Hartup, Barry K., Hamer, Sarah A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4464527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26061631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127679
_version_ 1782375991559061504
author Bertram, Miranda R.
Hamer, Gabriel L.
Snowden, Karen F.
Hartup, Barry K.
Hamer, Sarah A.
author_facet Bertram, Miranda R.
Hamer, Gabriel L.
Snowden, Karen F.
Hartup, Barry K.
Hamer, Sarah A.
author_sort Bertram, Miranda R.
collection PubMed
description While the population of endangered whooping cranes (Grus americana) has grown from 15 individuals in 1941 to an estimated 304 birds today, the population growth is not sufficient to support a down-listing of the species to threatened status. The degree to which disease may be limiting the population growth of whooping cranes is unknown. One disease of potential concern is caused by two crane-associated Eimeria species: Eimeria gruis and E. reichenowi. Unlike most species of Eimeria, which are localized to the intestinal tract, these crane-associated species may multiply systemically and cause a potentially fatal disease. Using a non-invasive sampling approach, we assessed the prevalence and phenology of Eimeria oocysts in whooping crane fecal samples collected across two winter seasons (November 2012–April 2014) at the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge along the Texas Gulf coast. We also compared the ability of microscopy and PCR to detect Eimeria in fecal samples. Across both years, 26.5% (n = 328) of fecal samples were positive for Eimeria based on microscopy. Although the sensitivity of PCR for detecting Eimeria infections seemed to be less than that of microscopy in the first year of the study (8.9% vs. 29.3%, respectively), an improved DNA extraction protocol resulted in increased sensitivity of PCR relative to microscopy in the second year of the study (27.6% and 20.8%, respectively). The proportion of positive samples did not vary significantly between years or among sampling sites. The proportion of Eimeria positive fecal samples varied with date of collection, but there was no consistent pattern of parasite shedding between the two years. We demonstrate that non-invasive fecal collections combined with PCR and DNA sequencing techniques provides a useful tool for monitoring Eimeria infection in cranes. Understanding the epidemiology of coccidiosis is important for management efforts to increase population growth of the endangered whooping crane.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4464527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44645272015-06-25 Coccidian Parasites and Conservation Implications for the Endangered Whooping Crane (Grus americana) Bertram, Miranda R. Hamer, Gabriel L. Snowden, Karen F. Hartup, Barry K. Hamer, Sarah A. PLoS One Research Article While the population of endangered whooping cranes (Grus americana) has grown from 15 individuals in 1941 to an estimated 304 birds today, the population growth is not sufficient to support a down-listing of the species to threatened status. The degree to which disease may be limiting the population growth of whooping cranes is unknown. One disease of potential concern is caused by two crane-associated Eimeria species: Eimeria gruis and E. reichenowi. Unlike most species of Eimeria, which are localized to the intestinal tract, these crane-associated species may multiply systemically and cause a potentially fatal disease. Using a non-invasive sampling approach, we assessed the prevalence and phenology of Eimeria oocysts in whooping crane fecal samples collected across two winter seasons (November 2012–April 2014) at the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge along the Texas Gulf coast. We also compared the ability of microscopy and PCR to detect Eimeria in fecal samples. Across both years, 26.5% (n = 328) of fecal samples were positive for Eimeria based on microscopy. Although the sensitivity of PCR for detecting Eimeria infections seemed to be less than that of microscopy in the first year of the study (8.9% vs. 29.3%, respectively), an improved DNA extraction protocol resulted in increased sensitivity of PCR relative to microscopy in the second year of the study (27.6% and 20.8%, respectively). The proportion of positive samples did not vary significantly between years or among sampling sites. The proportion of Eimeria positive fecal samples varied with date of collection, but there was no consistent pattern of parasite shedding between the two years. We demonstrate that non-invasive fecal collections combined with PCR and DNA sequencing techniques provides a useful tool for monitoring Eimeria infection in cranes. Understanding the epidemiology of coccidiosis is important for management efforts to increase population growth of the endangered whooping crane. Public Library of Science 2015-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4464527/ /pubmed/26061631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127679 Text en © 2015 Bertram et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bertram, Miranda R.
Hamer, Gabriel L.
Snowden, Karen F.
Hartup, Barry K.
Hamer, Sarah A.
Coccidian Parasites and Conservation Implications for the Endangered Whooping Crane (Grus americana)
title Coccidian Parasites and Conservation Implications for the Endangered Whooping Crane (Grus americana)
title_full Coccidian Parasites and Conservation Implications for the Endangered Whooping Crane (Grus americana)
title_fullStr Coccidian Parasites and Conservation Implications for the Endangered Whooping Crane (Grus americana)
title_full_unstemmed Coccidian Parasites and Conservation Implications for the Endangered Whooping Crane (Grus americana)
title_short Coccidian Parasites and Conservation Implications for the Endangered Whooping Crane (Grus americana)
title_sort coccidian parasites and conservation implications for the endangered whooping crane (grus americana)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4464527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26061631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127679
work_keys_str_mv AT bertrammirandar coccidianparasitesandconservationimplicationsfortheendangeredwhoopingcranegrusamericana
AT hamergabriell coccidianparasitesandconservationimplicationsfortheendangeredwhoopingcranegrusamericana
AT snowdenkarenf coccidianparasitesandconservationimplicationsfortheendangeredwhoopingcranegrusamericana
AT hartupbarryk coccidianparasitesandconservationimplicationsfortheendangeredwhoopingcranegrusamericana
AT hamersaraha coccidianparasitesandconservationimplicationsfortheendangeredwhoopingcranegrusamericana