Cargando…
Feasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery
BACKGROUND: The number of individual patient data meta-analyses published is very low especially in surgical domains. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of individual patient data (IPD) meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery by determining whether trialists agree to send IPD for eligible trials. ME...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4464630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26040278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0376-6 |
_version_ | 1782376011066769408 |
---|---|
author | Villain, Benoit Dechartres, Agnès Boyer, Patrick Ravaud, Philippe |
author_facet | Villain, Benoit Dechartres, Agnès Boyer, Patrick Ravaud, Philippe |
author_sort | Villain, Benoit |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The number of individual patient data meta-analyses published is very low especially in surgical domains. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of individual patient data (IPD) meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery by determining whether trialists agree to send IPD for eligible trials. METHODS: We performed a literature search to identify relevant research questions in orthopaedic surgery. For each question, we developed a protocol synopsis for an IPD meta-analysis and identified all related randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with results published since 2000. Corresponding authors of these RCTs were sent personalized emails that presented a project for an IPD meta-analysis corresponding to one of the research questions, with a link to the protocol synopsis, and asking for IPD from their RCT. We guaranteed patient confidentiality and secure data storage, and offered co-authorship and coverage of costs related to extraction. RESULTS: We identified 38 research questions and 273 RCTs related to these questions. We could contact 217 of the 273 corresponding authors (79 %; 56 had unavailable or non-functional email addresses) and received 68/273 responses (25 %): 21 authors refused to share IPD, 10 stated that our request was under consideration and 37 agreed to send IPD. Four corresponding authors required authorship and three others asked for financial support to send the IPD. Overall, we could obtain IPD for 5,110 of 33,602 eligible patients (15 %). Among the 38 research questions, only one IPD meta-analysis could be potentially initiated because we could receive IPD for more than 50 % of participants. CONCLUSION: The present study illustrates the difficulties in initiating IPD meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery. Significant efforts must be made to improve data sharing. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0376-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4464630 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-44646302015-06-14 Feasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery Villain, Benoit Dechartres, Agnès Boyer, Patrick Ravaud, Philippe BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The number of individual patient data meta-analyses published is very low especially in surgical domains. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of individual patient data (IPD) meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery by determining whether trialists agree to send IPD for eligible trials. METHODS: We performed a literature search to identify relevant research questions in orthopaedic surgery. For each question, we developed a protocol synopsis for an IPD meta-analysis and identified all related randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with results published since 2000. Corresponding authors of these RCTs were sent personalized emails that presented a project for an IPD meta-analysis corresponding to one of the research questions, with a link to the protocol synopsis, and asking for IPD from their RCT. We guaranteed patient confidentiality and secure data storage, and offered co-authorship and coverage of costs related to extraction. RESULTS: We identified 38 research questions and 273 RCTs related to these questions. We could contact 217 of the 273 corresponding authors (79 %; 56 had unavailable or non-functional email addresses) and received 68/273 responses (25 %): 21 authors refused to share IPD, 10 stated that our request was under consideration and 37 agreed to send IPD. Four corresponding authors required authorship and three others asked for financial support to send the IPD. Overall, we could obtain IPD for 5,110 of 33,602 eligible patients (15 %). Among the 38 research questions, only one IPD meta-analysis could be potentially initiated because we could receive IPD for more than 50 % of participants. CONCLUSION: The present study illustrates the difficulties in initiating IPD meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery. Significant efforts must be made to improve data sharing. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0376-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4464630/ /pubmed/26040278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0376-6 Text en © Villain et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Villain, Benoit Dechartres, Agnès Boyer, Patrick Ravaud, Philippe Feasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery |
title | Feasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery |
title_full | Feasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery |
title_fullStr | Feasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery |
title_short | Feasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery |
title_sort | feasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4464630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26040278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0376-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT villainbenoit feasibilityofindividualpatientdatametaanalysesinorthopaedicsurgery AT dechartresagnes feasibilityofindividualpatientdatametaanalysesinorthopaedicsurgery AT boyerpatrick feasibilityofindividualpatientdatametaanalysesinorthopaedicsurgery AT ravaudphilippe feasibilityofindividualpatientdatametaanalysesinorthopaedicsurgery |