Cargando…

Feasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery

BACKGROUND: The number of individual patient data meta-analyses published is very low especially in surgical domains. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of individual patient data (IPD) meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery by determining whether trialists agree to send IPD for eligible trials. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Villain, Benoit, Dechartres, Agnès, Boyer, Patrick, Ravaud, Philippe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4464630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26040278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0376-6
_version_ 1782376011066769408
author Villain, Benoit
Dechartres, Agnès
Boyer, Patrick
Ravaud, Philippe
author_facet Villain, Benoit
Dechartres, Agnès
Boyer, Patrick
Ravaud, Philippe
author_sort Villain, Benoit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The number of individual patient data meta-analyses published is very low especially in surgical domains. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of individual patient data (IPD) meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery by determining whether trialists agree to send IPD for eligible trials. METHODS: We performed a literature search to identify relevant research questions in orthopaedic surgery. For each question, we developed a protocol synopsis for an IPD meta-analysis and identified all related randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with results published since 2000. Corresponding authors of these RCTs were sent personalized emails that presented a project for an IPD meta-analysis corresponding to one of the research questions, with a link to the protocol synopsis, and asking for IPD from their RCT. We guaranteed patient confidentiality and secure data storage, and offered co-authorship and coverage of costs related to extraction. RESULTS: We identified 38 research questions and 273 RCTs related to these questions. We could contact 217 of the 273 corresponding authors (79 %; 56 had unavailable or non-functional email addresses) and received 68/273 responses (25 %): 21 authors refused to share IPD, 10 stated that our request was under consideration and 37 agreed to send IPD. Four corresponding authors required authorship and three others asked for financial support to send the IPD. Overall, we could obtain IPD for 5,110 of 33,602 eligible patients (15 %). Among the 38 research questions, only one IPD meta-analysis could be potentially initiated because we could receive IPD for more than 50 % of participants. CONCLUSION: The present study illustrates the difficulties in initiating IPD meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery. Significant efforts must be made to improve data sharing. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0376-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4464630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-44646302015-06-14 Feasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery Villain, Benoit Dechartres, Agnès Boyer, Patrick Ravaud, Philippe BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The number of individual patient data meta-analyses published is very low especially in surgical domains. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of individual patient data (IPD) meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery by determining whether trialists agree to send IPD for eligible trials. METHODS: We performed a literature search to identify relevant research questions in orthopaedic surgery. For each question, we developed a protocol synopsis for an IPD meta-analysis and identified all related randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with results published since 2000. Corresponding authors of these RCTs were sent personalized emails that presented a project for an IPD meta-analysis corresponding to one of the research questions, with a link to the protocol synopsis, and asking for IPD from their RCT. We guaranteed patient confidentiality and secure data storage, and offered co-authorship and coverage of costs related to extraction. RESULTS: We identified 38 research questions and 273 RCTs related to these questions. We could contact 217 of the 273 corresponding authors (79 %; 56 had unavailable or non-functional email addresses) and received 68/273 responses (25 %): 21 authors refused to share IPD, 10 stated that our request was under consideration and 37 agreed to send IPD. Four corresponding authors required authorship and three others asked for financial support to send the IPD. Overall, we could obtain IPD for 5,110 of 33,602 eligible patients (15 %). Among the 38 research questions, only one IPD meta-analysis could be potentially initiated because we could receive IPD for more than 50 % of participants. CONCLUSION: The present study illustrates the difficulties in initiating IPD meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery. Significant efforts must be made to improve data sharing. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0376-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4464630/ /pubmed/26040278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0376-6 Text en © Villain et al. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Villain, Benoit
Dechartres, Agnès
Boyer, Patrick
Ravaud, Philippe
Feasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery
title Feasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery
title_full Feasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery
title_fullStr Feasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery
title_short Feasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery
title_sort feasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4464630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26040278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0376-6
work_keys_str_mv AT villainbenoit feasibilityofindividualpatientdatametaanalysesinorthopaedicsurgery
AT dechartresagnes feasibilityofindividualpatientdatametaanalysesinorthopaedicsurgery
AT boyerpatrick feasibilityofindividualpatientdatametaanalysesinorthopaedicsurgery
AT ravaudphilippe feasibilityofindividualpatientdatametaanalysesinorthopaedicsurgery